Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шебуняев

Channel

Шебуняев

@Sheb95

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

171subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002627984858
TypeChannel
Username@Sheb95
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sheb95

Growth

169172170.57 August 2026 — 170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 170 subscribers15 August 2026 — 169 subscribers23 August 2026 — 170 subscribers31 August 2026 — 171 subscribers10 September 2026 — 172 subscribers18 September 2026 — 171 subscribers1717 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 169–172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 07:41171-1
10 Sept 2026, 17:19172+1
31 Aug 2026, 14:28171+1
23 Aug 2026, 21:03170+1
15 Aug 2026, 16:44169-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:01170no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:09170first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 36s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3126.7%
2118.1%
😁1815.5%
💯1512.9%
👍1210.3%
😱76.03%
32.59%
👏21.72%
😢21.72%
❤‍🔥10.862%
🎉10.862%
🤝10.862%
🤡10.862%
🦄10.862%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 16 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sheb95. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 April 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC86 views11 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nepexpertPhoto

🔹 Поздравляем нашего коллегу, Александра Шебуняева, технического директора НЭП, с успешным прохождением аттестации в Министерстве культуры Российской Федерации, в области сохранения объектов культурного наследия (за исключением спасательных археологических полевых работ), в области реставрации иных культурных ценностей! Мы убеждены: сильная команда — это команда, которая постоянно развивается. Поэтому наши специалис

🔥8👏2🎉1

14 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC177 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

▪️ Нас всю жизнь медленно убивает плохая архитектура 🔺 Когда говорят «опасное здание», все представляют обрушение, пожар, взрыв газа. Это «острые» угрозы – громкие, заметные, попадающие в новостные сводки. С ними хотя бы понятно, что делать: огородить, эвакуировать, признать аварийным, снести. ◽️ Меня давно занимает другое – угрозы хронические. То, что не убивает за минуту, а годами точит здоровье и работоспособнос

4👍2🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 15:39 UTC242 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🔸 Штрафы, суды и снос: судьба самовольных пристроек к многоквартирным домам ▪️ Прокомментировал для «Московского Комсомольца» громкую историю с пристройкой к элитному ЖК на Садовнической: поддельные подписи жильцов, коллективный иск, решение суда – и работы, которые всё равно продолжаются. 🔻 Заодно объяснил, можно ли вообще законно пристроить к многоэтажке террасу и почему «зелёный сад» на чужой крыше так быстро от

3👍2🔥2🦄1

12 Jun 2026, 17:09 UTC266 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

🟢 Когда в памятнике архитектуры вставил пластиковые окна... [Фрагмент из сериала «Последний министр», реж. Р. Волобуев]

😁2

8 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTC267 views7 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nepexpertVideo

Знакомая ситуация? 🟡 💬 Подписывайтесь на НЭП в MAX 🟢 НЭП | Законная недвижимость #НЭП_юмор

😁6🔥1

2 Jun 2026, 05:38 UTC245 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

▪️ Сталкивались с судебной экспертизой? ▫️ В настоящее время рассматривается законопроект о внесении изменений в закон об экспертной деятельности №73-ФЗ. Гос.учреждения «тянут одеяло» на себя (см. вопрос-ответ на видео). ▪️ В частности, для повышения общего уровня компетентности предлагается введение реестров организаций и экспертов, их обязательная аттестация, репутационная ответственность с возможностью исключени

🔥5

16 May 2026, 10:39 UTC280 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🟪 От эмоций к разуму: продолжаем про Шуховскую башню ▪️ Сразу пардон, немного лонгрид. Как говорил Паскаль: «Прошу прощения за столь длинное письмо – у меня не хватило времени написать короткое» ♥️ Предыдущий пост про разборку Шуховской башни был написан немного в крамольном стиле. Его даже репостнул популярный канал (Канал Петра Монича), что набрало мне несколько тысяч просмотров (большое сердечное спасибо, премно

3👍3🔥2

11 May 2026, 19:41 UTC317 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

🔹 Как точно описана аналогия согласования 🏗️🏗️ в Москве 🥲 Отрывок из фильма «Трасса 60», 2001 г., реж. Боб Гейл

😁7💯4🔥1🤡1

9 May 2026, 07:54 UTC302 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как вам такая доступность для МГН? [Изображение сгенерировано нейросетью. Все совпадения с реальностью случайны 😄]

🔥3😢2

1 May 2026, 19:08 UTC349 views7 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026

▪️ Записывать или фоткать? 🔸 Часто вижу, что кто-то предпочитает фотографировать или просто слушать информацию вместо записи и зарисовки (например, студенты при конспектировании на занятиях). Потом эта информация стремительно забывается. Почитал на досуге про это и вот что вычитал. ▪️ Исследования показывают, что участники, которые вели запись от руки, при проверке знаний набирают на 10-25% больше баллов по сравнен

💯61

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Sheb95. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шебуняев” (@Sheb95), 171 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sheb95.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.