Channel
@Shutter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,663subscribers
-215 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001292770874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Shutter |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Shutter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:33 | 39,663 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:14 | 39,673 | +27 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 39,646 | +12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 39,634 | -19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 39,653 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 39,666 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 39,680 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 39,684 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 39,689 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 39,702 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 39,712 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 39,727 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 39,732 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 39,734 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 39,741 | -17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 39,758 | -30 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 39,788 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 39,809 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 39,818 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 39,822 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (29 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 72,565 |
| Reactions total | 478 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
532 reactions across 29 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 238 | 44.7% | |
| 🔥 | 119 | 22.4% | |
| 👍 | 118 | 22.2% | |
| 🥰 | 33 | 6.20% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.94% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.752% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.564% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.564% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 0.376% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.188% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 575 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Prompt🤖 Flat-lay creative product photography on plain white paper. [Product from uploaded photo] stands upright in the center of the frame, with a whimsical crayon/colored-pencil drawing sketched around it on the paper, transforming the product into a superhero character — hand-drawn arms with clenched fists, a flowing cape, legs and boots, and small drawn accents (stars, lightning bolts, motion lines) radiating ou…
❤5🔥4👍3
Prompts🏢 Outdoor billboard advertisement mockup, large horizontal billboard mounted on a tall metal pole against a vivid blue sky with soft white clouds. Billboard displays [image from uploaded photo] as the main visual. Bright natural daylight, high contrast between the deep blue sky and the billboard, photorealistic outdoor advertising mockup style, sharp focus, professional commercial photography, low angle looki…
❤7👍3🔥3
Prompt📸 Studio portrait photography, [person from uploaded photo] standing centered, smiling warmly at the camera. Surrounded by multiple hands extending from the frame edges holding smartphones, all capturing photos/videos of the subject, creating a "surrounded by fans/paparazzi" effect. Clean seamless white studio background, soft even bright lighting, minimal shadows, high-key commercial aesthetic, phone screens …
❤9👍4🔥2
Prompt🌺 High-fashion editorial photograph, [person from uploaded photo] wearing [product from uploaded photo], standing barefoot in black strappy heels on the roof of a vintage silver classic muscle car half-submerged in a still forest lake, surrounded by lily pads and pink water lilies floating on the water, dense green forest trees and a rocky moss-covered shoreline in the background, confident pose with hand rela…
❤9👍7
Prompt🍴 Elegant studio product photography, a woman's hand in an elegant fur-trimmed sleeve lifting a polished silver serving dome (cloche) off a matching silver tray, revealing [product from uploaded photo] presented like a gourmet dish. Soft neutral grey background, dramatic reveal moment, elegant reflective highlights on the metal dome, soft studio lighting with subtle shadows, luxurious high-end product presenta…
❤8🔥7🥰2
Prompt📦: Minimalist studio product photography, a cardboard box trap concept: a large kraft cardboard box tilted up at an angle, propped open by a thin wooden stick, as if it's a classic box trap. [product from uploaded photo] neatly folded and placed on the ground underneath the box, as bait. Clean seamless light grey/white background, soft even studio lighting, soft realistic shadows, high-key minimalist aesthetic…
👍9❤4🥰4
Prompt🚙 Aerial close-up shot of a matte avocado-green vintage car with its door open, revealing the interior completely filled to the brim with halved avocados — spilling and cascading out through the open door onto the ground below, visible pits and creamy pale-green flesh, as if the entire inside of the car was packed with them. Chrome door trim and side mirror catching the light, dark asphalt visible in one corne…
❤9👍5🔥5
Prompt🏔 Surreal landscape made entirely of [product from uploaded photo] — giant slices/pieces of the food shaped like mountain peaks, arranged in a receding row across a rolling green hillside, under a bright blue sky with scattered white clouds. A person in a white t-shirt, shorts, and a straw hat sits alone on a wooden park bench in the foreground, facing away from camera, gazing up at the towering food formation…
❤14👍10🥰6👌3
Prompt💙💛 Transform the uploaded object into a minimalist editorial product photograph. Keep the uploaded object as the exact main subject, preserving its original shape, proportions, structure, materials, and recognizable details. Recolor the entire object to a vivid warm yellow, similar to a bright golden-yellow tone. Place the object outdoors on a slightly sloped grassy hill, photographed from a low angle against …
❤6🔥6🥰4
Prompt👜 Close-up product photo shot from inside an open luxury caramel-brown leather handbag, looking outward through a curved gap in the draped leather flap toward a bright pale blue sky, with a hand reaching into the frame from outside holding up a white cosmetic tube — [product from uploaded photo] — positioned in the center of the leather opening, warm natural sunlight streaming through the gap creating soft hig…
❤15👀4
Prompt✨ Surreal CGI product photo of multiple luxury handbags — [product from uploaded photo] — hanging from a pink carousel swing ride, each bag suspended by metal chains attached to a decorative pink ornate carousel canopy above, replacing the seats that would normally hold riders, swaying gently mid-motion; the setting is a whimsical outdoor garden filled with lush green grass, sunflowers, and colorful wildflower…
❤8👍7🔥3
Prompt💻🤳 Realistic outdoor mockup photo of one or more human hands holding up an [Apple phone/laptop] displaying [screen content from uploaded photo] against a bright clear blue sky with soft scattered white clouds, the device screen facing directly toward the camera fully visible and legible, held from below as if photographed looking upward, natural bright daylight with soft even lighting, shallow depth of field k…
❤7👍4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @Shutter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 907,347 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Midjourney/Nano Banana Prompts NeuroSpark” (@Shutter), 39,663 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shutter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.