📣 Разместите рекламу в этом канале — её увидят Аудитория Telegram остаётся активной, что бы ни говорили. Индекс читаемости это подтверждает: охваты каналов по тематикам держатся, люди продолжают читать. Реклама в Telegram — это законно: ФАС в 2026 году официально подтвердил, что она разрешена. 👉 Заказать размещение в этом канале можно через Telega.in — с маркировкой и закрывающими документами, за пару минут. Форм…

Channel
Fonts Best
@fonts_best
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,800subscribers
+199 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001792916335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fonts_best |
| Description | Блог сениор дизайнера. Рассказываю полезности, публикую шрифты и просто делюсь мыслями. Материалы не для коммерческого использования. По рекламе: @the_kind_soul Прайс: @creotbot На бирже: telega.in/c/fonts_best РКН - https://kurl.ru/AjdGN |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fonts_best |
Topic
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:05 | 19,800 | +1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:20 | 19,799 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:49 | 19,804 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:19 | 19,805 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:39 | 19,809 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 19,811 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 19,809 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:10 | 19,818 | +7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:31 | 19,811 | +5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 19,806 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 19,805 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:10 | 19,808 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 19,805 | +32 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:35 | 19,773 | +49 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 19,724 | +35 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 19,689 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 19,701 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 19,700 | -9 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:10 | 19,709 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 19,707 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.43%
- avg views ÷ 19,800 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,870
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.287%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (25 June 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,940 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,210
- Videos
- ≈117
- Links
- ≈1,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
128 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 39.8% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 21.1% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 11.7% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 7.03% | |
| 👨💻 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Название и описание местами поменялись и выглядит кринжово... ладно Анонимный опрос, ответьте честно какой у вас уровень? Если у вас другая профессия и сидите тут осознанно напишите пожалуйста в комменты причину почему Вы здесь😆 Ps: не делайте упор на цифры, можно настакать 5 лет опыта и оставаться крепким Жуниором. задайте себе вопрос кто Вы? Уверенный Мидл? или уже Сениор. Мне нужно понять свою Аудиторию так ч…
Posted without readable text
👨💻1
Ку, ребят а когда вообще смотрите на такой периодичность публикации? типа пару раз в неделю, это норм? или возникает чувство что я забросил канал и пора покинуть? и да я не с пустыми руками. Топ 10 очень хороших шрифтов Bricolage Grotesque Space Grotesk General Sans Aeonik PP Neue Machina Neue Montreal Cabinet Grotesk Manrope Space Mono Söhne
🔥11
наверно уже слышали про то что вайбкодеры создают программы такие вроде как фотошоп / афтер эффектс и другие программы Adobe. И преподносят это как уничтожение Adobe или унижения и тому подобное, сначала не понимал в чем уничтожения Adobe если у него и десятки лет назад существовали пиратские версии, ну типа зачем? так вот в вайбкодерских версиях есть отличие от пирастких, это ИИ генерации, Да! там они тоже оказыва…
Добавь разнообразия отойди немного от банальных Behance / Pinterest 4 интересных и полезных сайтов о которых (возможно) ты не знал packagingoftheworld.com Специализированная подборка упаковки: продукты питания, косметика, напитки и премиальные товары adsoftheworld.com Реальные рекламные кампании брендов: постеры, наружная реклама, digital-креативы и нестандартные рекламные идеи mindsparklemag.com Свежие проекты …
❤5👍1
Умиляет ещё то что эти "профессионалы" пишут в комментах, что сделали это видео потратив кучу времени и что всё приходит с опытом)
Успели уже увидеть в роликах про то что Claude Opus 5.5 делает монтаж лучше профессионального афтер эффектшика и даже озвучивает? это фейк. По крайней мере я уже 3 видео видел на разных языках видео одинаковые 1к1 а только тексты и язык поменялся, я ещё не нашел в чем прикол, возможно какой-то шаблон в самом же афтер эффект или в какой-то другой программе ну либо какой-то прикол. Сначала удивился/восхитился - после…
👍2🤣2🐳1
И как всегда Фотошоп в Топе. Неудивительно, учитывая что туда уже добавили и GPT и Нано бананы.
❤1
Сегодня поговорим про "Насмотренность" Насмотренность — это не сохранять по 100 картинок в Pinterest каждый день. Можно каждый день смотреть сотни работ и почти не становиться сильнее. Потому что насмотренность — это не количество увиденного. Когда смотришь старайся понять: — почему здесь именно такой размер объекта? — почему вокруг него столько воздуха? — почему этот цвет работает? — почему взгляд сначала падает…
❤7👍1
Почему некоторые дизайны выглядят дорого, хотя в них почти ничего нет? Иногда смотрю на дизайн и понимаю: здесь буквально ничего особенного — простой фон, один объект, крупный заголовок. Но визуально это выглядит дороже, чем работа, в которой в 3 раза больше деталей, куча времени ушло и разные шрифты. и дело даже не в минимализме как таковом. Дело в том, что в хорошем дизайне каждый элемент понимает, зачем он зде…
❤6💯2
Gros Ventre #free #cyrillic #latin #G Представляем современный и универсальный шрифт Gros Ventre ✅Идеально подходит для заголовков, логотипов, упаковки и веб-дизайна Gros Ventre выполнен в стиле гуманистического гротеска с выразительным и ярким дизайном, который прекрасно сочетает современную динамичность с чёткими геометрическими формами. Его сбалансированные пропорции и высокая читаемость делают его отличным вы…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @fonts_best. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @fonts_best as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 28 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 19 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Годом ранее делал опрос "Какой дизайн-инструмент вы используете чаще всего?
- Photoshop51%
- Figma27%
- After Effect26%
- Illustrator32%
- AI инструменты12%
- другое12%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Без никакого Негатива, просто опрос, В кино куда бы сходили? Человек Паук или Колобок?
- Тут выбор очевиден, Человек Паук59%
- Тут выбор очевиден, Колобок15%
- Тут выбор очевиден, из дома никуда, ждем Официального Релиза ⛵️26%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@fontsch · 67,043#1
@Font_ZIP · 19,308#2
@fontmn · 10,251#3
@wtfont · 129,164#4
@everyday_fonts · 9,336#5
@shriftograph · 11,260#6
@font_abc · 27,566#7
@sexyfont · 133,813#8
@abcletters · 32,532#9
@FreeFontsForAll · 18,281#10
@fonts_pr · 21,549#11
@DesignWorld · 47,748#12
@DesignWorldFiles · 27,321#13
@designphotoshoppp · 23,385#14
@DesignGoodies · 19,753#15
@mockupworld_tg · 20,025#16
@ooutsidepsd · 38,366#17
@Premiere023 · 35,306#18
@inDesignStock · 17,215#19
@movementsource · 21,082#20
@AEStorage · 88,038#21
@texture4photoshop · 55,562#22
@mockup_storage · 21,843#23
@hot_dsgn · 12,900#24
@Design_ZIP · 22,124#25
@Motion_ZIP · 17,871#26
@postersdesign · 11,397#27
@MotionFX_Free · 34,738#28
@graphicsleaks · 17,138#29
@hot_lustra · 11,016#30
@Fonts_my · 11,573#31
@projects4ae · 21,721#32
@Illustrationlessons · 47,262#33
@PSD_mockups · 43,804#34
@archive563 · 10,087#35
@designrar · 50,527#36
@dsgn_pro · 25,196#37
@Dasta_job · 11,610#38
@AETemp · 184,861#39
@dizaynga · 4,361#40
@creativemrkt · 20,928#41
@solutioonn · 21,848#42
@mockup_club · 66,341#43
@gulomovdesignblog · 3,122 (as read 30 September 2026)#44
@creative_resource · 29,721#45
@behzod_otajonov · 1,939#46
@freepik_premium_poster · 45,539#47
@LogotipUz · 5,905#48
@free_mockups_ps · 18,883#49
@Color_shot_blog · 1,774#50
@ish_elonlari01 · 3#51
@yarashev_shahzod · 1,117#52
@MockupsCloud · 24,003#53
@after_templates · 21,965#54
@ai_design_flow · 7,605#55
@portfolio_asadbeks · 1,963#56
@photoshopforyou · 64,605#57
@GuRu_Design · 1,059#58
@jurayev_portfolio · 1,704#59
@photoshop884 · 6,141#60
@shutter_files · 13,197#61
@freestockphotos · 20,018#62
@rizqimuz · 23,925#63
@f_freepik · 15,828#64
@premiere_pro · 63,855#65
@abdullohs_portfolio · 1,982#66
@a_study · 47,279#67
@alibekzimov · 804#68
@shakhzod_art · 1,589#69
@AEcomu · 26,358#70
@more_designa · 11,195#71
@alikhanovdesign · 637#72
@blogolimjanov · 1,049#73
@motion_club · 22,112#74
@designlabb · 12,191#75
@Yellow_Mockup · 13,922#76
@you_are_designer · 54,886#77
@islamismailov · 759#78
@Tools_Graphic · 19,213#79
@anv_dsgn · 625#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fonts_pr · 21,549
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
@fontsch · 67,043
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
@Font_ZIP · 19,308
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
@font_abc · 27,566
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
@abcletters · 32,532
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
@fontdisk · 19,341
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
@fontovik · 74,598
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
@creativemrkt · 20,928
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
@sexyfont · 133,813
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@DesignGoodies · 19,753
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 September 2026
@wtfont · 129,164
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@DesignWorldFiles · 27,321
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026
@shriftach · 38,464
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
@Shutter · 39,033
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
@PSD_mockups · 43,804
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
@mockup_storage · 21,843
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@MockupsCloud · 24,003
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
@Illustrationlessons · 47,262
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@freestockphotos · 20,018
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 September 2026
@logomockups · 24,620
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
@shrift_free · 57,335
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
@dsgn_pro · 25,196
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 September 2026
@designphotoshoppp · 23,385
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
@mockupworld_tg · 20,025
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fonts Best” (@fonts_best), 19,800 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fonts_best.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.