Как собрать свой AI-инструмент за пару часов и без разработчика Обучение автоматизации визуального брифинга с помощью ИИ от дизайн-директора компании Relate. Узнай, как создать AI-инструмент для эффективной автоматизации рабочих процессов Читать на дизайнерс | #урок

Channel
Hot Illustrator
@hot_lustra
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,117subscribers
-147 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001614659927 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hot_lustra |
| Created | 5 October 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hot_lustra |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 11,117 | -15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 11,132 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 11,136 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 11,142 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 11,148 | -19 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 11,167 | -15 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 11,182 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 11,186 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 11,197 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 11,201 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 11,207 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 11,208 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 11,209 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 11,214 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 11,226 | -14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 11,240 | -24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 11,264 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 11,275 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 11,277 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 11,283 | first reading |
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 5 October 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.62%
- avg views ÷ 11,117 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 625
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.132%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (5 October 2022 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,002 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11m 43s
- Average length
- 1m 10s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 24 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 86.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2022 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Как не слить деньги на разработку фичи, которая никому не нужна Статья раскрывает заблуждение дизайнеров, которые считают, что знают пользователей лучше, чем те сами. Автор обсуждает профессиональное проклятие, когда разработчики создают "интуитивно понятные" интерфейсы, но пользователи не могут ими пользоваться Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Дайджест новостей в дизайне за неделю (22.08.26 — 28.08.26) Новости дизайна: новый логотип для «Индилайт», ребрендинг Кубка мира по стрельбе из лука, дизайн упаковки Fish&More, новые обложки от Dirol, айдентика для «Нагория» и многое другое! Читать на дизайнерс | #дайджест
Обвесила разработку агентами, скиллами, ревьюерами — и всё равно облажалась Клиент отказался от прототипов админки, ссылаясь на расхождения с техническим заданием Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Студийная × дизайнерс Август уже перевалил за экватор, а значит, пора проверить, все ли ваши публикации добрались до конкурса. Если с 1 по 30 августа у вас на дизайнерс вышли кейсы, статьи, туториалы, исследования, чек-листы или другие материалы — отправляйте ссылки в @StudiynayaDSGNERSbot. В конце месяца раздадим: 🎙 3 бизнес-подписки на дизайнерс на полгода + 3 посева по большой сетке каналов — за максимальное к…
Секретные коды ChatGPT для фото: 60 слэш команд Команда превращает селфи в деловой портрет, другая переписывает логотип на вашем товаре. Прогнал 60 слэш-команд для фото на снимках: что оставить, усилить якорем, что выкинуть Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Новость, которую вы точно не ждали Сейчас отовсюду кричат про AI, про необходимость дизайнеру проникаться этими технологиями. Кричат не зря, наверное это уже база, чтобы быть конкурентноспособными (да че говорить, если я сам помогаю делать дизайн раздела образования через клод). Уже начали появляться курсы и интенсивы, которые дают неплохой старт, для того что бы дизайнер встал на новые ai-рельсы. Пару месяцев наза…
Дизайн-центричное управление продуктами: превращаем макеты в деньги Измерение влияния дизайна на бизнес: готовые шаблоны, план внедрения и анализ данных. Как принимать продуктовые решения на основе данных и улучшить дизайн-центричный подход Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
🥴1
Дайджест новостей в дизайне за неделю (15.08.26 — 21.08.26) Новый логотип Запретграма, аптечная СТМ Omidal от "Риглы", обновление Microsoft Copilot и другие дизайн-новости. Читайте подробности в статье! Читать на дизайнерс | #дайджест
«Клод, сделай как в прошлый раз»: дизайн, вёрстка и навыки, которые не плавают Статья о сложностях сотрудничества с дизайнером, который не придерживается единого стиля и постоянно меняет подходы к выполнению задач. Как сохранить баланс и эффективность в работе? Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Как случайная идея стала хитом «Магазинуса» Статья расскажет о том, как автор создал уникальный функциональный арт-объект, вдохновленный обычной детской игрушкой. Какие буквы он использовал и как сочетание формы и содержания привлекло его внимание Читать на дизайнерс | #кейс
3 привычки, из-за которых ИИ-генерации выглядят одинаково Статья об однообразии контента, создаваемого искусственным интеллектом. Рассматриваются привычки, влияющие на результаты генерации, и показывается, как распознать качественный контент Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @hot_lustra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ZIP_Files · 9,68111 postsKlondike
@black_klondike · 3,1272 postsСтудийная
@studiynaya · 1,1052 postsAI BOOST'26 — 22-23.10: Digital agency by AGIMA
@agima_agencies · 7271 postдизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,3111 postREDKEDS
@REDKEDSAGENCY · 4,9631 postTOP Mockup | Мокапы для дизайна
@topmockup · 10,2771 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hot_lustra named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Illustrationlessons · 47,548
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@illustrt · 35,592
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@contentcrate · 24,595
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
@Photoshop_dsgn · 40,472
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@ooutsidepsd · 38,288
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
@UstinovCreate · 23,360
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
@DesignWorld · 47,352
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
@Design_Garage · 29,701
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
@AEcomu · 26,199
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
@phhhphhh · 72,352
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
@designphotoshoppp · 23,293
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
@photoshop_hack · 59,171
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@photoshopforyou · 65,213
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
@premiere_pro · 64,028
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
@Design_ZIP · 21,891
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
@dsgn_box · 45,917
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@after_effects_motion · 65,162
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
@all4designer_premium · 28,747
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
@fourdesign · 34,458
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
@graphic_and_design · 23,272
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
@motion_club · 22,348
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
@texture4photoshop · 55,462
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@PSD_mockups · 44,158
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
@a_study · 47,229
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hot Illustrator” (@hot_lustra), 11,117 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hot_lustra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.