Chart looks lit Run it $5STAR

Channel
Sneaky Degens
@SneakyDegens
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,892subscribers
+1,322 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002573006452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SneakyDegens |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 43 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SneakyDegens |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:24 | 12,892 | -14 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:46 | 12,906 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 12,920 | -329 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:31 | 13,249 | -17 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 13,266 | -69 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 13,335 | -15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 13,350 | -32 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 13,382 | -65 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 13,447 | -51 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 13,498 | -50 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 13,548 | -27 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 13,575 | -24 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 13,599 | +3,988 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:39 | 9,611 | -34 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:30 | 9,645 | -29 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 9,674 | -3,244 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 12,918 | +2,986 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 9,932 | -63 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 9,995 | -356 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 10,351 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.86%
- avg views ÷ 12,892 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,140
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (16 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 15,993 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 06:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (21.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Gambled some $FIVE here on sol GTA 6 hype is gonna be insane and everyone knows what those 5 stars mean. This one just makes sense to gamble, good team as well who usually push https://dexscreener.com/solana/68pp3xccwhxg5qijgjcyuwsv764ttbevlm23ck85e85a https://x.com/5star_onsol
$WTAIL over 2x from my first call Team is stacked and good chads are joining Should fly much more imo, comfy
Also they secured their first investor today - 10k investment Getting eyes early cus tech is great https://x.com/whaletail_26/status/2116281595485204620?a=8ggwi-l8O9KkeWxdayo
Bought a bag of $WTAIL on sol here Been digging into what they’re building and it’s actually pretty interesting. The whole idea around forks, entangled coins and Venn pools feels different from the usual launchpad stuff. You can launch from X or TikTok, share fees with creators, and get discovered where traders already trade, launch dual-chain coins and you can copy trade the whales etc. What caught my attention e…
Breakout time $МЕДВЕД Chart looks primed
Aped some $МЕДВЕД here on sol 3 years of lore, one strange polar bear, November 2026 is finally here. Could see TikTok running with this, Rizzmas / Chill Guy typa vibes. Team’s last BNB coin hit $1M, previous SOL hit $3M. So tried here, some great contents on their X as well https://dexscreener.com/solana/bs9vxfk1la5bbyy4wqwgaemnr1a1w92fb3s3ebeyqx4d https://x.com/remembernov2026?s=21
$QCAT and $NINU are the next crime participants if $BATMAN and $NEARLY continue runs Obv gamble, but something to keep eye on as lowcap plays Anticipating near szn
Photo, posted without a caption
Im basically trynna front-run the near eco hype with these gamble plays, let’s see $NEAR pumped like 8/9% today in last 24 hrs.
I also gambled some $NINU too on near eco, launched on https://nearly.trade/ - the top meme giving $NEAR rewards - the one with the most holders (1,168) - the only Near meme on Fomo - the first meme to reach $1M Basically $NINU is the highest holders count project on that launchpad, chart looks bottomed from ath https://dexscreener.com/near/refv2-ninu-4.nearlytrade.near:wrap.near:10000
Anyway, I also gambled some $QCAT on near Launched on https://nearly.trade/ , it is the only main launchpad on near eco with great metrics Currently $QCAT is top 3 coin there / mcap wise Paired with $QTC - Quantus network as it is pumping hard lately and they also have tweeted QCAT few months ago https://x.com/quantusnetwork/status/1963494018790347170 So thesis is, as zcat ran to millys on stonkfun.xyz with simi…
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @SneakyDegens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sneaky Degens” (@SneakyDegens), 12,892 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SneakyDegens.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.