https://x.com/cz_binance/status/2115915423174853077?a=w1XRsjfoGTsUOyo24Uw&s=46 Funds are safu, half of the hacked amount is already frozen which is nice https://x.com/heyibinance/status/2115915841195942020?a=jnyT7JpLd1099q-kUCE&s=46

Channel
Sneaky Gems🥷
@SneakyGems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46,685subscribers
+2,719 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001453166495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SneakyGems |
| Description | I,m degen- all of my post are NFA DYOR Some calls mewwnn & some dust so always invest what you can afford to lose. Official X: https://x.com/SneakyGems Main Channel: @SneakyGems Gamble Channel: @SneakyDegens For marketing inquiries: @RealSneaky |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SneakyGems |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 46,685 | -95 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 46,780 | -62 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 46,842 | -59 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 46,901 | -45 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:14 | 46,946 | -96 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:55 | 47,042 | -72 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 47,114 | -75 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 47,189 | -134 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:51 | 47,323 | -98 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:05 | 47,421 | -71 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 47,492 | -54 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:01 | 47,546 | -101 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:05 | 47,647 | -229 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 47,876 | -794 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 48,670 | -147 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 48,817 | +7,763 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:04 | 41,054 | -3,297 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 17:02 | 44,351 | -1,798 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 46,149 | +2,974 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 43,175 | first reading |
Engagement
290 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 169 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.09%
- avg views ÷ 46,685 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,310
- 82 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 82
- of 290 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 290 (3 August 2026 – 29 October 2026) |
| Views total | 271,351 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Oct 2026, 11:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,810
- Videos
- ≈83
- Links
- ≈1,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 59s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://x.com/deitaone/status/2115913216559571316?a=bJPQhfGlPA6dJAb-ggU&s=46 Not confirmed yet, but wtfff is this man
Interesting https://x.com/chronear/status/2115772344979607890?a=nx3EB2CRNyTmGIguKH4&s=46 Brah said big week ahead for near eco, must be something rollin Our holding pack gotta pump lads $NEARLY $BATMAN Positioned with patience.
$VEIL pumped back to almost x2 from yest bottom call Still in floor range, still comfy https://x.com/veilzk/status/2115787974306910699?a=yYjmZuh2wyZftW0m5cw
At least positive news for macro when we choppin around 80k range, bulls are in control Hopefully pampa weeks ahead
Even if ur not holding any $HYPE n sidelined like me This is bullish for whole crypto, Elon always love crypto and is one of us He just dont hardshill, nigga lowkey positioned everywhere
Video, posted without a caption
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2115823011399938182?a=MYDecgIUhAsqvM7KWHw&s=46
$VEIL might actually bottomed here, still holding some just in case shit runs it back Over $130k+ revenue dashboard, veil points coming after 2 days Where holders can shield/ lock their tokens to get points and rewards through rev fee. If u ask me, that’s a great catalyst and idea for $VEIL holders to turn jeets into diamond hands. So I expect it to bounce it back, let’s see macro is looking good too
Impressive strength and consolidated chart. Stay positioned for the $CATE “expansion phase 2” comfy!
Near eco shitters “holding pack” before near szn spawn $NEARLY $BATMAN Top 1 launchpad and co-founder dog with highest mc and his support. Both chart looks bottomed n ranged enough.
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 290 posts we hold for @SneakyGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sneaky Gems🥷” (@SneakyGems), 46,685 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SneakyGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.