I re-bought some $Jimothy on this dip I feel like, 3/4m range supposed to be bottom for this raccoon 32k holders, still decent mindshare all over TL if u search / even after its peak viral time, and the main reason is community too, still active community and bounced over 18m+ like 2/3 times over last few weeks). https://dexscreener.com/solana/5pghkctym6odbhgo2tkmst2ajmjsb2uzbqrkkn4zuft5

Channel
Sneaky Gems🥷
@SneakyGems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43,050subscribers
-916 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001453166495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SneakyGems |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SneakyGems |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 43,050 | -2,110 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 45,160 | -513 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 45,673 | -439 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:12 | 46,112 | -160 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:03 | 46,272 | -153 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 46,425 | -86 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 46,511 | +1,544 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 44,967 | +3,560 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 41,407 | -328 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 41,735 | -891 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 42,626 | -848 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 43,474 | -384 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 43,858 | -997 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 44,855 | +1,531 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 43,324 | -87 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 43,411 | -414 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 43,825 | -70 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 43,895 | -119 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 44,014 | -438 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 44,452 | first reading |
Engagement
142 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.07%
- avg views ÷ 43,050 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,470
- 112 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 112
- of 142 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 142 (3 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 388,930 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 32s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
I bought some $fone here on this dip This monkey was running really well last week / before vol wars started in each chain, bunch of good names were shillin at that time. Ape on phone, relatable and obv narra to all crypto traders and it does make sense too 25k holders, think it has another leg after finding a certain floor ( prob 4-5m range), watch for entries around. https://dexscreener.com/solana/3dcwhqjp6jbtj…
Also I saw three potential trades w bottomed chart. Will be sharing shortly!
Didn’t saw much plays with AI agents concept on robinhood so im gonna see how it plays out / as they have live products, worth it to monitor! You don’t need to buy, watch launch first etc how it goes, if everything looks good and if I bid then I will update here Neither just skip it vros!
Rooting for $PAYGENT’s launch today. With Vlad Tenev pushing the AI agent payments narrative through Robinhood’s agentic credit card, this is a category I’m watching. Paygent built for months before launching. Its MCP is already live, enabling AI agents to make merchant payments using RH ETH & USDG. The token launches natively via Doppler with on-chain locks and vesting. Will update here if / when I buy. Watching …
Bunch of shaky charts as btc lil bit nukin and that Biden token launch news, gonna share my few new trades / position really soon.
I took p at right time for $CASHCAT / local top, think it will range around 148m~175m and will go for the next leg up again. Still holding a moonbag regardless!
Binance and Asian whales should genuinely lob this panda vros Idk why people r midcurving but it’s a obv and perf narra for the chain.
This panda went over 4x from first call btw Im still holding some and ranging around entry Thesis is, bsc trenches got motion these days / betting on strong narra could eventually turn out a win Let’s see, CTO comms holding a floor really well so far.
Gmm
Breakout time
Lookin good, this is a proper narra for bsc / Chinese face and most viral meme in asia, if these faggots don’t flip for pennys This should easily run
Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @SneakyGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sneaky Gems🥷” (@SneakyGems), 43,050 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SneakyGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.