Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 34 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Sobhan_adv — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +3,734. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 189,032–198,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:01
197,502
+955
15 Sept 2026, 17:56
196,547
+1,187
13 Sept 2026, 23:02
195,360
+759
12 Sept 2026, 08:17
194,601
+1,342
10 Sept 2026, 02:00
193,259
+2,238
6 Sept 2026, 21:39
191,021
+850
4 Sept 2026, 10:38
190,171
-98
3 Sept 2026, 01:56
190,269
-13
2 Sept 2026, 00:37
190,282
+51
1 Sept 2026, 03:26
190,231
+94
31 Aug 2026, 00:35
190,137
-113
29 Aug 2026, 23:14
190,250
-123
28 Aug 2026, 20:36
190,373
-10
27 Aug 2026, 20:39
190,383
-231
26 Aug 2026, 18:22
190,614
-19
25 Aug 2026, 14:52
190,633
+47
24 Aug 2026, 13:56
190,586
-135
22 Aug 2026, 23:49
190,721
-398
21 Aug 2026, 10:37
191,119
-103
20 Aug 2026, 12:45
191,222
first reading
Engagement
943 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.812%
avg views ÷ 197,502 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
557 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
557
of 943 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 410 of 557 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
943 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
893,739
Reactions total
1,424
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 12:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈27,800
Videos
≈1,390
Links
≈19,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 10m
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 169 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,940 reactions across 604 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,435
74.0%
❤🔥
208
10.7%
👍
121
6.24%
👌
73
3.76%
😍
58
2.99%
👏
45
2.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 663 of the 943 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,982 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 943 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#آگهی_آقایان
#تهران
با سلام و عرض ادب خدمت اعضای محترم کانال، بنده اقا مجرد 41 ساله اهل و ساکن تهران هستم، شمال غرب با خانواده زندگی میکنم، جهت تامین نیازمندی از راه حلال و شرعی ، قد 178 وزن 98، بدنبال رابطه بلند مدت هستم و قصدم یافتن یک پارتنر و شریک مطمئن و معتقد و متعهد هست که مثل خودم فعلا امکان یا تمایلی به ازدواج ندارد، قصد خرید و فروش ندارم لطفا متوجه باشید. بانوانی که تمایل دارند و فاصله شرعی از …
#آگهی_بانوان
#کد آگهی #24619
#پرند
بانو
31 ساله
سفید170/69
پرند
منزل موجوده برای پذیرایی
مهریه توافقی بالاتر از عرف
دنبال رابطه شرعی و حلالم
👈ارتباط با مدیر👤
👈ورود به کانال اصلی📡
👈فیلتر شکن پر سرعت و با کیفیت سبحان🌐
👈ورود به ربات کانال🤖
#آگهی_آقایان
#تهران
#تهران
حدود 30 ساله، مجرد، تهران _ آذربایجان
(قدم 190 وزنم تقریبا 70 کیلو ست)
سلام، من ایلیا (مستعار) هستم
به دلیل شرایط کاری و نداشتن امکان ازدواج دائم در حال حاضر، به دنبال ازدواج موقت شرعی با چارچوب مشخص و محترمانه ام
در کل مقید و منطقی و مؤدب هستم
دنبال حاشیه و تنوع طلبی هم نیستم و کلی بررسی و مشاوره صورت گرفته تا به این تصمیم رسیدم
به خاطر کارم در رفت و آمدم و قبلا در تهران منز…
#آگهی_بانوان
#کد آگهی #24618
#تهران_شرق
سلام خدمت اقایون محترم
پری هستم26سالمه قدم 160وزنم60 تنها زندگی میکنم شرق تهران
دنبال رابطه ای با ارامش و عشق هستم
اقا به بهداشت خودت اهمیت ویژه ای بدن خوشتیپ و خوش برخورد باشن
همسر ی مهربان و دست و دلباز باشن سنشونم 20تا45سال باشه
مهریه توافقی
👈ارتباط با مدیر👤
👈ورود به کانال اصلی📡
👈ورود به ربات کانال🤖
⛔️همکاری با ادمین ها و فعالان فضای مجازی و اینستاگرام
چنانچه ادمین هستید یا پیج اینستاگرامی دارید یا علاقمند هستید در فضای مجازی کار کنید و کسب درآمد کنید ، ما آماده همکاری با شما هستیم .
نحوه همکاری :
⛔️در مرحله اول از ربات لینک مخصوص خودتان را دریافت کنید . چنانچه شخصی با لینک شما ، عضو ربات و کانال شود ، ربات برای شما یک پیام ارسال می کند و آیدی شخص و کیف پول و امتیاز شما را ارسال می نماید .
⛔️بابت هر جوین…
قابل توجه اقایان
با توجه به جشنواره تخفیف دیروز ،و تعداد بالای پیام های کاربران ، جواب دهی با تاخیر در حال انجام است .
همه پیام ها تا پایان امروز پاسخ داده خواهد شد
لطفا پشت سر هم پیام ندهید . این کار پاسخگویی به شما را به تاخیر خواهد انداخت
#آگهی_آقایان
#تهران
آگهی من
با سلام و احترام
39 سالمه ،متاهل هستم و با خانواده مشکلی ندارم به دلایلی رابطه منظمی در خانه ندارم ولی همسرم رو دوست دارم و مطلقا نمیخوام کوچکترین آسیبی بهشون برسه ، در عین حال میتونم متعهد بشم که برای همسر موقتم هر چه در توانم هست از حمایت مالی و عاطفی کوتاهی نخواهم کرد چون این رو وظیفه خودم میدونم ، خودم مذهبی و معتقد هستم منتها خشک مذهب نیستم و بسیار مهربان و قابل اطمینان و …
#آگهی_بانوان
#کد آگهی #24617
#تهران_شمال
با سلام و وقت بخیر
خانمی هستم
ساکن شمال تهران
قد 170
وزن68
چهره و تیپ و استایل ایده آل و مناسب دارم ، مهربان ،خونگرم و اجتماعی، متعهد می باشم،جویای رابطه با آقا فهیم و وفادار ،دارای وجه اجتماعی و مالی مناسب و بدون حاشیه و لارج می باشم، منزل جهت پذیرایی دارم و ترجیحاآقای محترم ساکن شمال تهران باشن، رابطه جلسه ای و کوتاه مدت مد نظرم نیست.
مهریه بالاتر از عرف کان…
❤🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 943 posts we hold for @Sobhan_adv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Sobhan_adv edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
31
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
7
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
24
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Sobhan_adv named 31 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@hamid13426940 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026 · confirmed gone 22 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@skma12901 named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@makiii_r named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@ali_vasii named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 19 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@m24280d named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@omid13700224 named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@farshid2094 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 6 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@agfvrbjkmbf named in 2 posts, 19 September 2026 – 20 September 2026
@apoubdve named in 2 posts, 19 September 2026 – 20 September 2026
@dghjkcdsch named in 2 posts, 7 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
@sfffvdmn named in 2 posts, 7 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
@seyedmohammad24 named in 2 posts, 7 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
@mahmodmj1234 named in 2 posts, 7 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
@mahmod_salam named in 2 posts, 7 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
@hamius2000 named in 2 posts, 3 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@maghm73 named in 2 posts, 2 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
@hamid6940 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
@leader1400 named in 2 posts, 16 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@hgvgdbhd named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@mrf3340 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@ingod1405 named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
@shooli1405 named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
@aligs755 named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
@radfolad1405 named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@ali1364012 named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@ahosseinhhhhhhh named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@cheapimo named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@yaran_1433 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@yaranman313 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@omidoo6420 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@asemaneabi1367 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سَُُبَُُحَُُاَُُنَُُ (فعال از سال ۱۳۹۵)” (@Sobhan_adv), 197,502 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sobhan_adv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
