We accept KOL working with standard Project.
For Business Inquire contact with me
📞 Telegram: @Mdkhairul1
My others Community
👉 My X : x.com/Solutionsparkdm
👉 My Youtube channel: youtube.com/solutionspark
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 41 days, net -901. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,494–40,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 04:01
39,629
-36
15 Sept 2026, 06:58
39,665
-19
13 Sept 2026, 12:40
39,684
-23
11 Sept 2026, 15:21
39,707
-35
9 Sept 2026, 00:38
39,742
-57
5 Sept 2026, 19:15
39,799
-44
3 Sept 2026, 14:41
39,843
-33
2 Sept 2026, 07:13
39,876
-42
1 Sept 2026, 08:17
39,918
-27
31 Aug 2026, 05:39
39,945
-34
30 Aug 2026, 09:07
39,979
-21
29 Aug 2026, 10:34
40,000
-22
28 Aug 2026, 12:34
40,022
-29
27 Aug 2026, 15:13
40,051
-16
26 Aug 2026, 13:34
40,067
-26
25 Aug 2026, 14:04
40,093
-48
24 Aug 2026, 11:56
40,141
-39
22 Aug 2026, 23:04
40,180
-41
21 Aug 2026, 09:54
40,221
-19
20 Aug 2026, 09:43
40,240
first reading
Engagement
718 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.13%
avg views ÷ 39,629 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
396 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.373%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
397
of 718 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 332 of 396 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
718 (5 August 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
648,795
Reactions total
2,049
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Sept 2026, 21:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈49,300
Videos
≈1,900
Links
≈41,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
59m 49s
Average length
1m 56s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,439 reactions across 578 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,304
67.0%
🤔
341
9.92%
🔥
204
5.93%
👻
169
4.91%
😱
81
2.36%
😢
65
1.89%
🤯
50
1.45%
🤩
48
1.40%
👍
41
1.19%
💔
39
1.13%
👏
32
0.931%
🙏
18
0.523%
🥰
18
0.523%
🆒
11
0.32%
🎉
8
0.233%
🕊
5
0.145%
⚡
2
0.058%
🤝
2
0.058%
🏆
1
0.029%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 597 of the 718 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,439 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 718 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 716 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Solutionspark1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 718 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
$ALLOX TGE is getting closer
The team says everything is progressing as planned
They’re currently handling the legal requirements, including the MiCA whitepaper for several CEXs they’re working with
• Public launch announcement: Coming soon
• Pre-TGE $ALLOX opportunity: Also coming
Nothing official yet on the exact details
Keep an eye on the official channels
CATALYST EARLY ACCESS
Another early project to check out: CatalystMkts
They’re building around “markets for moments” and early access is now open
✨Here’s how to get started
• Create your Catalyst account https://catalyst.market
• Connect your X account
• Complete the available activities
• Post on X when required
• Invite friends with your referral link
• Keep checking for new tasks
I’m already getting in early an…
Showing the 12 most recent of 718 posts we hold for @Solutionspark1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Solutionspark1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Cost - 2.16$
Earning - 7$
And 1 Visa card free Bonus money withdrawable ( Yes or No) Need KYC
Yes I want to do78%
No I Don't Want24%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 718 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Earning BD Shemul💰 @Earning_BD_Shemul · 25,980 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 September 2026
💰Rifat Official💰 @RifatOfficialBD · 28,725 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 8 September 2026
Afsar Official Airdrop @AfsarofficialYT · 29,205 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 September 2026
Online Income QUEEN💸 @OnlineIncomebd720 · 27,373 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 10 September 2026
𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟯𝟲 @allearning36 · 107,012 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
Bangla Tutorial 99 @banglatutorial99 · 144,758 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
New Airdrop Bangla | AiBangla @newairdropbangla · 34,728 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 3 September 2026
BNV Community @BNV_Community · 29,159 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
ফ্রি পেইড কোর্স🍂 @freepaidcourse144 · 38,196 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 31 August 2026
𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗕𝗗 𝗦𝗢𝗕𝗨𝗝💰 @Earning_Bd_Sobuj · 37,615 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 31 August 2026
NG Officials Airdrops @NGofficialbdairdrop · 41,569 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
Nayeem Rezvan | Updates @nayeemrezvanupdates · 36,802 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
YouTubeVhai @YouTubeVhaiBD · 51,237 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
тʀᴀᴅᴇ sQuᴀᴅ (ғʀᴇᴇ sɪɢɴᴀʟ) @tradesquad222 · 27,755 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
Elias Hossain @channelelias · 301,133 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
Jamuna Television @JamunaTelevisionOfficial · 33,675 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 3 September 2026
𝗢𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽𝘀 𝟮𝟰™ @OnlineHelps_24 · 47,479 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 26 August 2026
Trading Master AAR @tradingmasteraar01 · 61,164 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
Tech Tuber Rana @tech_tuber_rana · 71,726 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
ZEALY 0.2 @Zealy_02 · 59,940 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
Technical Sabbir @technicalsabbirEMO · 96,029 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗮 𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 @BanglaCryptoEarning · 108,810 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
Earning from crypto 🇧🇩 @justrefar · 30,607 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
VRIFIED AIRDROP Global @globalairdrop24 · 50,751 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Solution Spark” (@Solutionspark1), 39,629 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Solutionspark1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.