See I told ya, 7x 🎯

Channel
Sonic Calls
@Soniccall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,528subscribers
-1,205 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001550594410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Soniccall |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Soniccall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 6,528 | -1,040 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 7,568 | -304 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 7,872 | -173 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 8,045 | -195 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 8,240 | -211 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 8,451 | +391 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 8,060 | +425 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 7,635 | -375 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 8,010 | -164 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 8,174 | +465 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 7,709 | -24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 7,733 | first reading |
Engagement
306 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.44%
- avg views ÷ 6,528 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 485
- 176 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 176
- of 306 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 306 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 85,435 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Hehe 5x 😎
4x smashed 🔥
I knew this would run. 3x
4x on $DINGER ✅
$DINGER is quietly printing the chart has been a staircase of higher lows for 24 hours. no violent pumps, just steady, relentless buying. this is the hallmark of institutional-style accumulation on-chain. the underlying narrative fits perfectly with the current cycle rotation. 7fmHqRpJLgpVsJFTvrv24CEjkz9c4o5uVX4Zdur1hz35 GMGN Website | Twitter | Telegram
$LOOSE a textbook reversal play. sellers exhausted themselves trying to break support and now the buyers are taking absolute control. the transition in momentum is clear on the tape. first target is the previous local high. 2UMByb4bYyDqEMbGMjV36zTKHhXMQbPRWjiHfXoypump Dexscreener · GMGN
I knew this would run. 5x
early look at $ILLIԚUID this is what early discovery looks like. social volume is practically zero but on-chain volume is surging. the ratio of buyers to sellers is indicating a heavy imbalance. getting in before the broader market catches on. j5djiWWv4rT7k9KHn6n3BwuQbVpHPrMjmTGkG5xpump Chart Website | Twitter
$ATH — the real deal tired of the noise? look at this chart. no artificial spikes, just a solid, methodical climb. this is what a real community looks like when they believe in the asset. it's rare to see something this stable at this stage of the launch. 2CqsLSTUdDqifDPXqBgowuwhWXVbf3Je5HmxCiospump Chart · GMGN
See I told ya, 2x 🎯
$TOKEN — volume alert the volume profile just shifted dramatically. we're seeing 4x the average hourly volume and the price is holding the upper bounds of the range. this is a pressure cooker ready to pop. verified the liquidity is permanently locked. 0x69b3dd03cc143b71a7df7874c8cffbe031aa6aec Chart
Showing the 12 most recent of 306 posts we hold for @Soniccall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Phanes_bot · 65,1872 postsRick
@rick · 71,1892 postsbeluga portal
@belugacoinportal · 831 postBullX Bot
@BullXBetaBot · 17,1181 postCash Kitty
@cashkittyrh · 1111 postFROUMP
@FROUMPCOIN · 101 postMax Portal
@GiggleMascotBNB · 2341 postmode9sol_official
@mode9sol_official · 31 postRick’s Lab
@rickburpbotnews · 72,5721 postSchrödinger | Elon's cat
@Schrodingerogpf · 2591 postOG Caesar Portal
@theogcaesar · 251 posttoadcatportal
@toadcatportal · 31 posttoadwifportal
@toadwifportal · 11 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sonic Calls” (@Soniccall), 6,528 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Soniccall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.