شرافتمندی، استراتژی آدمهای سادهلوح و بازنده نیست‼️ 💢همهی ما بارها افرادى رو ديديم كه بدون هیچ خط قرمزى، دست به هركارى مى زنن تا به چیزی كه میخوان برسن... 📌جردن پيترسون ميگه شايد براى مدتى بتونى تارو پودِ واقعيت رو خم کنی، قوانين رو دور بزنى، ميانبُر بسازى و حتی ممكنه پاداشش هم ببینی؛ اما واقعيت رو به يه كمربند لاستیکی ضخيم تشبيه مى كنه كه هرچی بيشتر خمش کنی، با نيروى ویرانگرتری به جاى اولش برمىگرده! وقتى تو ب…

Channel
پروژه سوختِ جت 🚀
@SookhteJet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,897subscribers
-413 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001008635530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SookhteJet |
| Description | اینجا برای کسانیست که تصمیم گرفتند رویاهایشان را با قدرتِ جِت فتح کنند و تاریخساز شوند... «به صورت روزانه سوخت جت دریافت میکنید» - اینستاگرام : instagram.com/SookhteJet.ir |
| Created | 26 September 2015 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SookhteJet |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 58,897 | -41 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 58,938 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:52 | 58,947 | -39 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 58,986 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 58,985 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 59,009 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 59,023 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 59,025 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 59,027 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 59,047 | -27 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 59,074 | -24 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 59,098 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 59,111 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 59,128 | -16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 59,144 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 59,150 | -16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 59,166 | -27 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 59,193 | -40 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 59,233 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 59,246 | first reading |
Engagement
13,192 posts held, back to 26 September 2015 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 783 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.82%
- avg views ÷ 58,897 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,430
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 13,192 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13,192 (26 September 2015 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 133,750 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 08:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,870
- Videos
- ≈1,340
- Links
- ≈3,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 50s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
رشدی دوباره از دل رنجها … ✨ زندگی همیشه هموار نیست، ترکیبی از رنج، تلاش و ایستادنه، راهها گاهی سخت میشن و تلاشها شکست میخورن اما هر قدم چیزی به تو اضافه میکنه که قبلا نداشتی پس ادامه بده رفیق حتی اگر ناامیدی، پایان این مسیر بهترین ها درانتظارتن❤️✌️ #عکسنوشته_انگیزشی 📸 ___ سوخت جت | کانالی برای موفق ها ✨ @sookhtejet 🚀
چطور انرژی ذهنیت رو چند برابر کنی؟ ⚡️ با یادگرفتن این تکنیک میتونید از اول صبح تا آخر روز انرژی و انگیزهتون رو بالا نگهدارین و شب ها راحت تر بخوابین🔥💤 اين ويديو بخشی از پروژه توربو 🚀 ‼️رایگان فقط تا ۲۴ ساعت ❌از دستش ندید دریافت از لینک زیر 👇👇👇 https://sookhtejet.com/be-mentally-dangrous
اندرو هوبرمن، استاد عصبشناسی دانشگاه استنفورد، توی این ویدیو توضیح میده: چرا بعضی روزا انگیزهت مثل بمب میترکه و بعضی روزا حتی از جا بلند شدن هم برات سخته🔋🪫 و چطور میتونی با استفاده از «الگوی کورتیزول» این چرخه رو کنترل کنی🌀 کاملش رو تو پست بعدی براتون میذارم👇
👆این نمودار سطح کورتیزول، هورمونی که همه فکر میکنن فقط برای استرس! اما دلیل اصلی بیانگیزگی و بیحوصلگیت تنظیم نبودن این هورمون، توی تحقیقات اخیر دانشگاه استنفورد تونستن الگویی رو کشف کنن که تغییر میزان کورتیزول باعث میشه انرژیتون صبح ها ۱/۵ برابر بیشتر و در شب ها بهقدری کم بشه که درجا خوابتون ببره !🔋💤 میخوای این الگو رو یاد بگیری؟ ویدیو بعدی رو ببین👇👇👇
🌀🧠 راه حل بازکردن گرههای ذهنیت اینجاست : 1️⃣ نگرانی هاتو بنويس،بعد ببين احتمال اينكه واقعا اتفاق بيفته چقدره ودر آخر روى چیزایی تمركز كن كه دست خودته و ميتونى تغييرش بدى. 2️⃣ براى تصميم گرفتن يه زمان كوتاه براى خودت بذار و اگه فقط ۵۱٪ درصد مطمئنی، همونو انتخاب كن و برو جلو. 3️⃣ موفقيت ها ودست آوردهات رو يادداشت كن تا شاهدى واقعى براى توانمندى هات داشته باشی. #پرونده_رفتاری @sookhtejet 🚀
واقعا انجامش بده ببین چی میشه 👆🏻 @sookhtejet
« تکنیک ۹۰ ثانیه » از آنتونی رابینز ⏳ با این تکنیک میتونی هر حس بد و سنگینی رو توی ۹۰ ثانیه از بین ببری و کنترل انرژیت رو بدست بگیری و عملکردت رو ۲/۵ برابر بیشتر از قبل کنی ✌️🔥 این آموزش بخشی از اشتراک توربو🚀 برای دیدن ویدیو کامل روی لینک زیر کلیک کن 👇 👇👇 https://sookhtejet.com/turbo
این مرد و میشناسی ؟؟👆 ایشون آنتونی رابینز، مشاور شخصی چهار رئیسجمهور آمریکا و یکی از تاثیرگذار ترین مربیان انگیزشی دنیا🔥 💪توی آخرین سمیناری که اخیرا برگزار کرد که بلیطش نزدیک به هزار دلار بود، تکنیکی رو آموزش داد که باعث میشه تو ۹۰ ثانیه انرژی لازم برای انجام هرکاری رو بدست بیاری ! باورت نمیشه؟؟ ویدیو بعدی رو خودت ببین 👇👇👇
Posted without readable text
انفجار آمار افسردگی در ایران❗️🧨 💢براساس گزارش سازمان جهانی بهداشت (WHO) که بهتازگی منتشر شده، بعد از جنگ، در ایران از هر ۷ نفر، ۱ نفر دچار فرسودگی روانی و افسردگی شده…! @sookhtejet
اخیرا حس نمیکنید هرچی سخت تر کار میکنید انگیزهتون کمتر میشه!؟؟
- ۱- آره زیاد70%
- ۲- نه اصلا30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13,192 posts we hold for @SookhteJet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اخیرا حس نمیکنید هرچی سخت تر کار میکنید انگیزهتون کمتر میشه!؟؟
- ۱- آره زیاد70%
- ۲- نه اصلا30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 November 2023 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@dyuna · 7140 postsنتایج و نظرات شاهکلید
@Nazarat_shahkelid · 3178 postsنتایج مهندسی امواج ذهنی
@Nazarat_Amvajzehni · 8668 posts💸تریدرشو| TRADERSHOO💸
@sookhtejet_s1 · 43742 postsGmail | #77
@gmail · 8,3729 posts雅虎搜索 @Yaho
@yahoo · 2,2195 postsFood
@sookhteje · 13 postsاکوسیستم کارآفرینی ایران
@ecosystemir · 9692 postsMonkeShop.io MAIN
@hotmail · 4,6651 postپروژه سوختِ جت
@SooktheJet · 1591 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@SookhteJet named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 135 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 117 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 55 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 47 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@renesinaniofficial · 230,158#1
@drkavyanii22 · 199,398#2
@royalmind · 118,770#3
@sokoon1111 · 376,428#4
@modiresabz · 16,083#5
@pesare_khorshid · 668 (as read 22 August 2026)#6
@farzad_berices · 380,597#7
@sookhtehjetViP · 5,754#8
@CaliansClan · 12,736#9
@darasadhezarii · 80,241#10
@brandupp · 14,722#11
@bit_roya · 1,347#12
@minerflash · 3,487#13
@mohammadbasiri · 146,356#14
@basiri7 · 85,341#15
@farsitate · 5,834#16
@bishtarazyek · 44,945#17
@DMboard · 15,526#18
@stbbroker_ir · 6,653#19
@tradeviproom · 35,131#20
@jahanetrade · 4,303#21
@rooktrade · 45,701#22
@forexadam1111 · 18,275#23
@nofappeople · 7,433#24
@drkv_online · 41,666#25
@AbolYd · 946#26
@hoseinmind · 282,096#27
@androtits · 4,505#28
@soheilsangarzadeh · 87,990#29
@monsterscollege · 5,942#30
@jadoyebavar · 6,471#31
@renesinani20 · 11,781#32
@masculinebros1 · 61,657#33
@angizetowri · 16,693#34
@PhantomLeaders · 5,011#35
@topwomen7 · 1,097#36
@milyarder · 51,301#37
@arshiyaniha · 64,158#38
@servat_iranblockchain · 2,746#39
@alisiahkolah1 · 9,559#40
@hosseintaheri128 · 17,801#41
@tradingprofessorchannel · 69,953#42
@pink_doree · 13,922#43
@mensclubofficial · 8,972#44
@Chiakopayamx · 18,441#45
@Akbari09154040409 · 7,900#46
@pulsepack · 25,710#47
@drfrya · 57,067#48
@yekhesekhob · 12,353#49
@Sparta_Power · 14,138#50
@eseminarir · 3,809#51
@dispenza_2021 · 13,825#52
@hooshemaliii · 84,986#53
@MasoudBlashRazekaenat · 26,580#54
@dralirezaazmandian · 40,280#55
@wizeset · 9,288#56
@ferekansenab · 26,473#57
@servat75 · 38,514#58
@adam3 · 94,248#59
@halakoeivip · 110,526#60
@cloobmali · 107,454#61
@matinmentalofficial · 45,584#62
@cafetradeiran · 58,864#63
@bashgahcafetrade · 45,779#64
@cafetradetv · 75,515#65
@Ara_mjan · 6,304#66
@adwakeup · 43,961#67
@sadehbafi · 5,490#68
@iranmarketinguniversity · 95,997#69
@kar_kasb · 18,599#70
@Ibrahimovic_Fans · 687#71
@thelastzeus · 3,620#72
@hamechidoOoniDiyar · 2,851#73
@mahbodmusicccc · 2,455 (as read 22 August 2026)#74
@soheilsangarzadeh2 · 49,140#75
@Robertkiyosaki_ir · 8,209#76
@renesinai · 1,305#77
@Nano_Books · 13,448#78
@dr_joedispenza · 28,836#79
@nimakimiaei · 8,907#80
@archivelight · 12,082#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@renesinaniofficial · 230,158
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@dralirezaazmandian · 40,280
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
@royalmind · 118,770
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@imansarvarpour_masir_academy · 50,991
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@soheilsangarzadeh · 87,990
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
@arshiyaniha · 64,158
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@drkv_online · 41,666
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@drkavyanii22 · 199,398
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@drfrya · 57,067
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
@mohammadbasiri · 146,356
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@hooshemaliii · 84,986
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@soheilsangarzadeh2 · 49,140
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
@babayepoldar · 30,548
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
@basiri7 · 85,341
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
@gharavix · 233,244
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@abasmanesh · 37,067
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
@milyarder · 51,301
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
@hoseinmind · 282,096
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@anousha_eternal · 82,653
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@servat75 · 38,514
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
@ladyboss_etemad · 101,859
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
@PodCa3t · 72,584
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@abasmanesh_com · 49,569
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
@masoud_musiic · 158,339
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پروژه سوختِ جت 🚀” (@SookhteJet), 58,897 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SookhteJet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.