52 measurements spanning 30 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,573–33,804 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 22:39
33,633
+2
4 Sept 2026, 12:17
33,631
+16
3 Sept 2026, 06:19
33,615
+2
2 Sept 2026, 21:04
33,613
+8
2 Sept 2026, 00:04
33,605
+3
1 Sept 2026, 19:04
33,602
+2
1 Sept 2026, 02:13
33,600
-4
31 Aug 2026, 20:18
33,604
-4
31 Aug 2026, 04:17
33,608
+1
30 Aug 2026, 23:03
33,607
-3
30 Aug 2026, 02:26
33,610
+2
30 Aug 2026, 01:36
33,608
-11
28 Aug 2026, 00:33
33,619
no change
28 Aug 2026, 00:13
33,619
+1
27 Aug 2026, 03:18
33,618
-5
26 Aug 2026, 23:04
33,623
+9
26 Aug 2026, 02:53
33,614
+3
26 Aug 2026, 01:14
33,611
-31
25 Aug 2026, 05:13
33,642
-5
25 Aug 2026, 00:36
33,647
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 33,633 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,200
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.687%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
25 (1 December 2025 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
50,980
Reactions total
350
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
64
Videos
6
Links
110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,264 reactions across 25 posts, in 102 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 6.34% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5287357736424604939
334
6.34%
custom 5285063309060509952
242
4.60%
custom 5352692766046448980
217
4.12%
custom 5438516237074206727
209
3.97%
custom 5461014276498038020
139
2.64%
custom 5258463567279064410
114
2.17%
custom 5321273143245951622
113
2.15%
custom 5314610618177708023
112
2.13%
custom 5332311720297795814
108
2.05%
custom 5386663646665414394
106
2.01%
custom 5438522872798680254
105
1.99%
custom 5458668361065991498
104
1.98%
custom 5379708419575926881
98
1.86%
custom 5353017177811217388
93
1.77%
custom 5352774941655721447
89
1.69%
custom 5285194666340290331
83
1.58%
custom 5321326147437349168
82
1.56%
custom 5199608410651267526
77
1.46%
custom 5379566483791694283
77
1.46%
custom 5366296525200700382
75
1.42%
82 further kinds
2,687
51.0%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
855
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 25 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
142
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sticker_Awwww. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 December 2025 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺LINK🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
#ДеньРоссии #12июня #Россия
https://t.me/addemoji/SubjectsRF
Стикеры 1
Стикеры 2
🇷🇺С ДНЁМ РОССИИ!🇷🇺
К празднику 12 июня подготовили новый набор с флагами и гербами субъектов Российской Федерации!
С праздником! Желаем мира, добра, благополучия и новых достижений нашей большой стране! 🇷🇺
BOOST КАНАЛА
👊👊👊👊❤️🔥👊👊👊👊👊👊❗️
В набор к 9 Мая добавили вот такой шрифт
👊👊👊❤️🔥👊👊👊👊❗️
https://t.me/addemoji/May9emoji2024
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
#9мая
Стикеры
🔥BOOST КАНАЛА 🔥
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Sticker_Awwww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ares Channel @ARE5H · 728,128 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
Emoji Club 🪼 @Emoji_Club · 33,251 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
Emoji Letters | Эмодзи Буквы Шрифты @emojiabc · 73,837 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 19 August 2026
Premium Emojis @ShoutoEmoji · 86,121 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Эмоджи буквы шрифты TelegramPremium TgEmojis @TgEmojisFonts · 78,244 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 August 2026
Telegram Premium Emoji | Премиум Эмодзи @OrderEmoji · 99,015 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 16 August 2026
Royal PAIZA CLUB @royalgameth · 114,144 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
𝐓𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐑𝟐𝟒 @tunder24 · 58,821 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 4 September 2026
P6-VIP** @p6svip · 33,361 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
NEKO 777 @NEKO777G · 40,181 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 4 September 2026
KC9 Club @KC9999B9 · 40,441 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
WINK488PLUS @wink488plus · 107,708 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
TMB77 อัพเดตข่าวสารต่างๆ @tmb77net · 50,754 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
R39 อัพเดทข่าวสารต่างๆ @R39Services · 33,792 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Emoji | Эмодзи | Sticker | Стикеры | на заказ” (@Sticker_Awwww), 33,633 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sticker_Awwww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.