Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -3,277. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,082,375–1,090,225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:59
1,083,281
-658
16 Sept 2026, 15:57
1,083,939
-778
14 Sept 2026, 21:18
1,084,717
-1,891
13 Sept 2026, 08:00
1,086,608
+408
11 Sept 2026, 13:21
1,086,200
+223
8 Sept 2026, 18:18
1,085,977
-1,560
5 Sept 2026, 11:41
1,087,537
+231
3 Sept 2026, 16:01
1,087,306
-45
2 Sept 2026, 09:25
1,087,351
-867
1 Sept 2026, 10:47
1,088,218
+108
31 Aug 2026, 09:33
1,088,110
+64
30 Aug 2026, 09:03
1,088,046
+170
29 Aug 2026, 10:36
1,087,876
+103
28 Aug 2026, 08:08
1,087,773
+31
27 Aug 2026, 11:33
1,087,742
-818
26 Aug 2026, 14:52
1,088,560
-684
25 Aug 2026, 11:32
1,089,244
-75
24 Aug 2026, 10:13
1,089,319
+351
22 Aug 2026, 17:04
1,088,968
+422
21 Aug 2026, 08:16
1,088,546
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.4%
avg views ÷ 1,083,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
351,000
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.594%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
30 (6 May 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
2,808,800
Reactions total
16,689
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈746
Videos
≈3
Links
≈1,280
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 9 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 8 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3 days of being posted; a typical post has already reached 41.3% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 76.1% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 98,350 views — 9.08% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 112,300).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
106,782 reactions across 30 posts, in 97 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5362081079224180363
26,465
24.8%
custom 5330468934514646919
14,722
13.8%
custom 5310168075805403369
13,322
12.5%
custom 5222311371554700374
8,664
8.11%
custom 5283105267829997242
7,062
6.61%
custom 5269395156695531656
4,659
4.36%
custom 5235876063686440105
4,493
4.21%
custom 5456557453359474322
2,590
2.43%
custom 5359421107193538011
2,174
2.04%
custom 5258512809079119140
1,510
1.41%
custom 5260514671860917174
1,489
1.39%
custom 5436036357317235271
1,165
1.09%
custom 5319298072470129458
993
0.93%
custom 5289524710634180115
911
0.853%
custom 5262595862688703598
772
0.723%
custom 5361621298680175398
759
0.711%
custom 5348423147647414077
712
0.667%
custom 5321281368108343946
641
0.6%
custom 5298962579144615028
536
0.502%
custom 5316950838483125676
460
0.431%
77 further kinds
12,683
11.9%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,684
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 30 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
303
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @emoji1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨 Бот для покупки ⭐️Telegram звёзд дешевле чем в самом приложении! ⭐️
Покупайте звёзды, подарки💝 и премиум👑 подписку с удобной оплатой! 🏦
⭐ купить звёзды со скидкой: @StarsPremkaBot
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @emoji1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@emoji1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
эмоджи и стикеры | темки, фоны, языки @emojipipka · 27,469 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
Emoji Letters | Эмодзи Буквы Шрифты @emojiabc · 74,064 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 19 August 2026
Premium Emojis @ShoutoEmoji · 85,051 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Telegram Premium Emoji | Премиум Эмодзи @OrderEmoji · 99,282 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 16 August 2026
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji @TgEmojis · 1,673,928 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 August 2026
Emoji Club 🪼 @Emoji_Club · 32,885 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
Emoji | Эмодзи | Sticker | Стикеры | на заказ @Sticker_Awwww · 33,648 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 4 September 2026
Эмоджи буквы шрифты TelegramPremium TgEmojis @TgEmojisFonts · 78,382 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 August 2026
Premium emoji Премиум эмодзи @emoji_stirery · 108,612 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
⋅ʚ ✧ ꒰ఎ Wexsavĭ ໒꒱ ✧ ɞ⋅ @wexsavi · 419,670 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 10 August 2026
Premium Emoji Эмодзи и Стикеры @emodzhi · 517,294 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026
cuteenotart ⋞˶ⓛᴥⓛ˶⋟෴ @cute_enot_art · 25,030 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 September 2026
Адаптивные эмодзи | Фоновые эмодзи @adaptivki · 58,684 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
folwixxx | темы и стикеры @f3lvixx · 154,638 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 12 August 2026
Стикеры | Эмодзи @stikery4 · 1,076,984 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 August 2026
Fix Fox Stickers | Premium Emoji @Fix_x_Fox · 58,171 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
Стикеры | Telegram Stickers @TgStickery · 266,274 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 12 August 2026
Премиум эмоджи | Адаптивные Emoji и Тексты песен в Эмодзи @AirEmojis · 55,429 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
ꪀ᥆ꪝꫀꪎꪱ | стикеры и темы @nowexi · 21,963 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 22 September 2026
Эмоджи | Эмодзи @TgEmodzi · 265,982 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 August 2026
ririmoji ♡ emoji & stickers @ririmoji · 21,887 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 22 September 2026
марс | языки и темы @ahnoee · 449,441 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 August 2026
Стикеры из ВК @stickers_vk · 99,476 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
Telegram Stickers | Стикеры @tgsticker · 792,397 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 126 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Best Premium Emoji | Премиум Эмодзи” (@emoji1), 1,083,281 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emoji1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.