Channel
@adaptivki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,060subscribers
+1,026 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002061986794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @adaptivki @emoji_fon |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 93 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adaptivki |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 59,060 | +6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 59,054 | +10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 59,044 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 59,047 | +13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:30 | 59,034 | +6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:05 | 59,028 | no change |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 59,028 | -20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 59,048 | +7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 59,041 | +12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 59,029 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 59,030 | +19 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:09 | 59,011 | no change |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 59,011 | +7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 59,004 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 59,016 | +4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:25 | 59,012 | +7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 59,005 | -11 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 59,016 | no change |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 59,016 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 59,019 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 162 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (30 March 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 86,150 |
| Reactions total | 202 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 08:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3,453 reactions across 37 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5195462620454346370 | 887 | 25.7% | |
| custom 5447192375954795787 | 529 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5240479448289005949 | 522 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5436386165223608662 | 518 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5285365219491617444 | 511 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5444867029121132838 | 486 | 14.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,453 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adaptivki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 March 2026 to 21 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGGwdAh | 1 | 21 October 2026 | 21 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 21 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Большинство людей смотрят на картину меньше 15 секунд. А ведь за это время они не успевают увидеть почти ничего. Историк искусства создала канал, который учит замечать то, что обычно скрыто от взгляда. Без лекций. Без снобизма. Простым языком. Здесь картины начинают рассказывать истории, здания перестают быть просто красивыми фасадами, а прогулка по городу превращается в маленькое исследование. Если любите путешес…
custom 51954626204543463703custom 52404794482890059491
#774 https://t.me/addemoji/Statusesbyluna_by_fStikBot #adaptive #marvel 🖤напоминалка, голосовать за канал
custom 543638616522360866212custom 519546262045434637011custom 544486702912113283810custom 52404794482890059491
#773 https://t.me/addemoji/WIN_NT31 #adaptive #logo 🖤напоминалка, голосовать за канал
custom 524047944828900594914custom 519546262045434637011custom 544719237595479578711
💰Скупаем ваши NFT — за 80% от флора. Теперь в нашем боте можно не просто купить NFT-подарок, а так же моментально продать свои подарки с быстрым выводом на USDT TON (GRAM), СБП, Карты РФ и баланс бота. 😊 Как это работает? Вы отправляете подарок на оценку в специальном разделе —> Мы озвучиваем свою цену выкупа —> Если она устраивает, то передаёте подарок на наш аккаунт и моментально получайте деньги за него. 🖤 Влад…
custom 54363861652236086624custom 51954626204543463703
#772 https://t.me/addemoji/sticks_67132_by_TgEmodziBot #adaptive #DeathNote 🖤напоминалка, голосовать за канал
custom 543638616522360866221custom 544486702912113283817custom 544719237595479578715custom 52404794482890059497custom 52853652194916174446custom 51954626204543463702
#771 https://t.me/addemoji/to_archaic #adaptive #random 🖤напоминалка, голосовать за канал
custom 528536521949161744417custom 519546262045434637015custom 543638616522360866212custom 54471923759547957879
#770 https://t.me/addemoji/numberbadges #adaptive #icons #words 🖤напоминалка, голосовать за канал
custom 543638616522360866224custom 528536521949161744410custom 52404794482890059498
Купить звёзды ⭐️ Купить тг премиум ⭐ Купить нфт подарки 🎁 Арендовать нфт подарки 🏪 Можно в нашем боте: @adaptivki_bot
custom 52404794482890059494custom 54448670291211328384custom 54471923759547957872
#769 https://t.me/addemoji/sti_kohane_azusawa_by_TgEmodziBot #adaptive #anime 🖤напоминалка, голосовать за канал
custom 524047944828900594929custom 544486702912113283821custom 519546262045434637017custom 52853652194916174446custom 54471923759547957874
Posted without readable text
custom 52853652194916174448
#768 https://t.me/addemoji/graclea #adaptive #pets 🖤напоминалка, голосовать за канал
custom 544486702912113283839custom 524047944828900594921custom 543638616522360866216custom 544719237595479578710custom 52853652194916174445custom 51954626204543463703
#767 https://t.me/addemoji/gryaznye_kartnki_by_TgEmodziBot #adaptive #random 🖤напоминалка, голосовать за канал
custom 519546262045434637035custom 543638616522360866221custom 544486702912113283821custom 52853652194916174443custom 52404794482890059492custom 54471923759547957872
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @adaptivki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@adaptivki edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Адаптивные эмодзи | Фоновые эмодзи” (@adaptivki), 59,060 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adaptivki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.