Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +220. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,675–5,020 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:15
4,949
-4
13 Sept 2026, 05:39
4,953
-27
9 Sept 2026, 15:58
4,980
+95
4 Sept 2026, 03:21
4,885
+24
31 Aug 2026, 23:26
4,861
+4
29 Aug 2026, 05:43
4,857
+78
26 Aug 2026, 04:54
4,779
+8
22 Aug 2026, 20:34
4,771
+14
19 Aug 2026, 05:54
4,757
-2
12 Aug 2026, 18:24
4,759
+44
9 Aug 2026, 19:32
4,715
-6
6 Aug 2026, 19:44
4,721
-8
6 Aug 2026, 04:36
4,729
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,255 reactions across 18 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5273834404827902958
422
33.6%
custom 5766929622872628238
331
26.4%
❤
139
11.1%
🥰
68
5.42%
😈
58
4.62%
👍
51
4.06%
🌚
26
2.07%
🍾
25
1.99%
💘
22
1.75%
🔥
19
1.51%
🍌
17
1.35%
💅
15
1.20%
😎
15
1.20%
🍓
14
1.12%
😍
9
0.717%
❤🔥
8
0.637%
custom 5767290430190263669
5
0.398%
🤩
4
0.319%
🦄
3
0.239%
🐳
1
0.08%
3 further kinds
3
0.239%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @StupidIra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.45%
1 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
425
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
790
over 27 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGXo7jw
1
3 August 2026
3 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
💜Девочки, скоро 1 сентября, а значит, пора познакомиться с новым профессором из новинки Ирины Тис «Монстр Нокса»!
#чтото_на_красивом
🟣Продолжение хита «Демон Рида» от восходящей звезды dark-romance!
🟣Серийное оформление: твердый переплет с лаком на обложке и иллюстрацией художницы lorandesore.
📖 До свободы Лире Вейн остался всего один учебный год. Диплом Гарварда — последнее условие завещания, после которого она н…
И всё-таки я хочу уже начать рассказывать о своей новой истории и очень нуждаюсь в вашей поддержке🫶🏻🫶🏻🫶🏻
СЛР о музыке, любви и выборе
«Будем жить горя» 🔥 18+
Там где ритм и мелодия сливаются воедино, Руслан - крутой барабанщик группы «Роверы» - живёт музыкой и мечтой о большой сцене. Его привычный мир меняется, когда он встречает Агату, очаровательную вокалистку с голосом, пробуждающим чувства. Одна песня переплет…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Книгу 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩автор Ирина Тис
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Быть подписанным на наши каналы
🤩Мемуары Ирины Тис
🤩Вилли Энн Грей | серия книг "Истинная Демона"⚔❤️🔥🔞
🤩Поставить номерок здесь(следите чтобы номерки не повторялись)
🤩🤩🤩✨🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
+🤩за новый комментарий на обоих каналах , по теме от 4-х слов-скрины
+🤩за Репост на канал от 50пдп или 5 друзьям (скрины)
+🤩за Репост на канал от 1000пдп(скрин)
Итоги 🤩🤩 августа
Отправка приза
Девочки, ну кто из нас не мечтал поступить в Гарвард (особенно после фильма «Блондинка в законе» 🫧)? Ирина Тис дарит нам такую возможность в своей новинке «Монстр Нокса»!
🔵Долгожданное продолжение хита «Демон Рида»!
🔵Тропы: преподаватель и студентка, запретная любовь, серая мораль, разница в возрасте.
🔵Серийное оформление: твердый переплет с иллюстрацией на обложке от lorandesore.
До свободы Лире Вейн остался всего…
Читаем ваши мысли... Открыли предзаказ на «Проект Сенсум» Ксении Гарден🌟
#розовая_корзинка
🎀Мрачный романтический технотриллер на стыке темной академии, антиутопии и психологической драмы
🎀Для поклонников dark romance, фантастических триллеров и эмоционально напряженных историй о контроле, зависимости и свободе воли
🎀Твердый переплет, серийное оформление от Shark
Лидия Петрас живет в закрытой Академии Ментальных И…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Привет, мои дорогие! 😋
Вы же знаете, как сильно я люблю совместные чтения. 😋
И вот решила попробовать организовать их не по своей книге, а по истории прекрасной Ирины Тис — «Демон Рида»( как я могу удерживаться, если гг на обложке очень похож на Рена, ещё и название про демонов). Мне очень хочется, чтобы мы вместе познакомились с этой историей и, конечно же, хорошенько её обсудили. 😋
🔴…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @StupidIra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 61 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
F a c e l e s s ✨ @faceless_sr · 25,594 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мемуары Ирины Тис” (@StupidIra), 4,949 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StupidIra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
