Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ТАША МИСНИК║с любовью 💜

Channel

ТАША МИСНИК║с любовью 💜

@tasha_missnik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,310subscribers

+544 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001738007097
TypeChannel
Username@tasha_missnik
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tasha_missnik

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,72310,37010,046.56 August 2026 — 9,766 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,766 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,764 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,743 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,723 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,745 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,746 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,742 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,020 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,037 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,047 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,057 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,052 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,062 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,087 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,107 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,140 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,197 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,216 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,269 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,370 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,316 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,310 subscribers10,3106 August 202617 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 43 days, net +544. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,626–10,467 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:3710,310-6
15 Sept 2026, 21:0010,316-54
14 Sept 2026, 06:1810,370+101
12 Sept 2026, 16:3910,269+53
10 Sept 2026, 17:2110,216+19
7 Sept 2026, 14:5710,197+57
4 Sept 2026, 16:2110,140+33
3 Sept 2026, 05:5810,107+20
2 Sept 2026, 02:1310,087+25
1 Sept 2026, 02:3510,062+10
30 Aug 2026, 00:0710,052-5
28 Aug 2026, 23:1410,057+10
28 Aug 2026, 00:1610,047+10
27 Aug 2026, 02:4510,037+17
26 Aug 2026, 05:1510,020+278
22 Aug 2026, 20:559,742-4
19 Aug 2026, 02:459,746+1
15 Aug 2026, 19:259,745+22
12 Aug 2026, 14:039,723-20
9 Aug 2026, 20:119,743first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 10,310 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held39 (3 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total8,331
Reactions total630
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 54s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,885 reactions across 33 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,20631.0%
🔥63016.2%
💋48112.4%
😍41810.8%
❤‍🔥3348.60%
🤣2065.30%
🎉1784.58%
🍓1162.99%
💔631.62%
💯441.13%
😱441.13%
🥰411.06%
💘370.952%
😈230.592%
😢230.592%
custom 5287654815017492645170.438%
🍌130.335%
👏80.206%
🤔20.051%
🆒10.026%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,386 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 39 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tasha_missnik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
7.69%
3 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,070
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,690
over 36 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFFxpE8H316 August 202626 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC471 views52 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @torimyron

Posted without readable text

38💯8🎉6

26 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC≈1,370 views144 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFFxpE8HPhoto

Шалунья NOCTAVERE творит разврат для ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥🌟 ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥, (изображения без цензуры в комментариях под постом) Осторожно 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Я тлела под телом Нэйта, зарывалась спиной в песок, но продолжала прижимать его к себе изо всех сил. Я таяла от соприкосновения с горячей грудью, с каждой твердой мышцей, руками, которые жадно скользили по моей коже. Я плавилась под ним, подстраиваясь под каждый

🔥83❤‍🔥28💋199😍5

26 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,190 views86 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ща все будет

🥰4125🤣16💋4

26 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,220 views135 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Я упустила момент, когда мы тут собрали уже почти 300 реакций… Это что получается… мне опять придется показывать на канале разврат? 🙂

🔥93💯27💋114

25 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC≈1,380 views76 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

😋 Для начала определитесь с платформой и/или издательством (если вы сразу нацелились туда), которым подойдет конкретно ваш жанр и формат. Имею в виду, к примеру, если вы пишете фэнтези, вам нет смысла стучаться туда, где отдают приоритет слр и наоборот. Отыщите свою «нишу» и бронируйте там себе местечко. Второе, что могу сказать, — трубите о своей книге везде. Больше о путях продвижения начинающему автору я наболтала

50💘15💋7🎉4

25 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,310 views73 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

😋 Издательство — это в первую очередь коммерческая организация, поэтому такое оформление — не награда автору за заслуги, а инвестиция в конкретную книгу. В моем случае издательство посчитало, что клапаны, иллюстрации и цветной обрез повысят привлекательность издания и его коммерческий потенциал. Но, конечно же, при принятии такого решения учитываются и аудитория автора, и продажи предыдущих книг. Это всегда совокупно

🎉3723💋13

25 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,390 views64 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Video

Тут ответила на парочку ваших анонимных вопросов 💌 1️⃣О продвижении 2️⃣О нейросетях Задать вопросы анонимно можно ТУТ #ВидеоОтТаши

49👏8🔥7

24 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,740 views121 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 Дарим оригинальный kindle 🤩🤩 мятного цвета за 14 500₽! ЧТОБЫ ВЫИГРАТЬ НУЖНО: 1⃣ Подписаться на нас ⤵️ Сия Тони • Алёна Черничная Тори Майрон • Джейн Эванс Лена Сокол • Алекс Хилл Таша Мисник • Софи Баунт Мира Салье • Катерина Кавалье 2⃣Быть активным на наших каналах 3⃣Нажать кнопочку «участвую» *Итоги: 14 сентября в этом чате БУДЕМ РАДЫ РЕПОСТАМ

🔥7127💋23

Signed Randomize Bot 🎲 [Рандомайзер]

21 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈2,290 views358 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня у создательницы этих шедевров NOCTAVERE день рождения, если кто не знал 😏 Давайте поздравим креативного человечка и накидаем реакций на это пост и на канал Даши Соберем тут 250 реакций, и я покажу вам супер 🥵 и мега эксклюзив контент по «Без сожалений», который создала Даша (больше нигде не покажу) Вот кусочек вам на затравочку…

232😍64💋57💯2🔥2🍓1

21 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈1,930 views80 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Мне тут подсказали, что на ОЗОН тоже появился предзаказ «Без сожалений» ❤️ ССЫЛКА ТУТ ❤️

💋43🍓17🎉119

21 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC≈2,070 views141 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFFxpE8HVideo

Сюжетное видео по ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️ ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥, сотворенное золотыми руками NOCTAVERE 🌙 Осторожно 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 — Поэтому я ухожу, – Фостер поймал мой взгляд. – Поэтому больше не вернусь. Будь спокойна. Губы Нэйта дрогнули в слабой улыбке, но большей горечи на его лице я не видела, наверное, никогда. Он развернулся, чтобы уйти, и я даже успела облегченно выдохнуть, но внезапно Фостер схватил меня за

😍71💔36❤‍🔥13🎉1110

20 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,920 views143 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video

История одной сбывшейся мечты ✨ Я с раннего детства мечтала о собаке. И когда у моей подружки из соседнего подъезда появилась малютка такса с мохнатыми ушками, я поняла, что мое сердце навсегда отдано именно этой породе. К сожалению, жилищные условия не позволяли нашей семье содержать питомца. И мне оставалось только умиляться этим прекрасным созданиям и мысленно уверять себя, что однажды и я стану счастливой облада

82💋25💔21😍8❤‍🔥5🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @tasha_missnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лиза Лазаревская
@lazarrevskaya · 26,427
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТАША МИСНИК║с любовью 💜” (@tasha_missnik), 10,310 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tasha_missnik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.