Xato berilgan variantni toping..
- ㄱ – k,g15%
- ㅅ – ch77%
- ㄹ – r, l5%
- ㅂ – b,p3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥4❤2

Channel
@TOPIK_STUDY
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,597subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001228753241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TOPIK_STUDY |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TOPIK_STUDY |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 1,597 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 1,602 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 1,604 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 1,605 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 1,608 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 1,613 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 1,615 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 1,617 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 1,620 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 1,619 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 1,620 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 1,622 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 1,626 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 1,626 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
149 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 21.5% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 20.8% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 20.1% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 9.40% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 8.72% | |
| 🗿 | 9 | 6.04% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 6.04% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 3.36% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.34% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.34% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.671% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.671% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2025 to 29 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Xato berilgan variantni toping..
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥4❤2
해결방안: 활용하기에 수월하게 만들어야 한다.
🔥4
Yomon taraflari 디지털 기기를 쓰는 어른들을 여러움에 당한다. 시간을 많이 낭비할수 있다. 장애인들에게 불편함을 만든다
🔥6
Yaxshi taraflari 시간을 이낄수 있다. 문제를 문의 없이 스스로 해결할 수 있다.
🔥5
Xullas 54 sigini mavzusi 디지털 기기 haqida tushdi
🔥5
Assalomu alekum. Kelasi oy bu kareys Ozbekistonga sayohat qilar ekan. Koreys tilini biladigan toshkent guliston fargonaga olib bora oladigan gid qidiryapti ekan. Xoxlovchilar bolsa gid bolib berishi mumkin pulini berar ekan qanchaligini ozingizlar kelishib olasizlar mani umuman tanishim emas)
❤6
공기를 들이마시고, 공기를 내쉬세요. Вдохните и выдохните воздух.
🥰5😈1
Faqat 1-2kishi bn dars qila olaman xolos)
혹시 토픽시험에 같이 준비하실 분 있나요? 원하는 조건이 하나만 있는데 수준이 중급 이상이어야 해요. 조건에 맞는 분이 계시면 @Switzerl2nd 으로 연락 주시면 됩니다
🔥2
안녕하세요 여러분. Va nihoyat oqishni ham bitirib oldim. Shaxsiy ishlarim sababli vaqt kamligi uchun anchadan beri kanalga hech nima joylamabman. Buyogiga tez tez bolmasa ham kerakli materiallar joylashga harakat qilaman. Hammaga omad:)
👍8🔥4
Photo, posted without a caption
🤯9❤2🔥1
갚다 (qarzini uzmoq) so'zining otgan hozirgi va kelasi zamonlardagi qo'shimcha qo'shilishi Ex: 저는 친구에게 빌린 돈을 다 갚았습니다.
👍14❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TOPIK_STUDY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Xato berilgan variantni toping..
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2025 to 29 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@TOPIK_STUDY named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TOPIK STUDY🏆” (@TOPIK_STUDY), 1,597 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TOPIK_STUDY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.