از آنچه دارید راضی باشید و زندگی را همان گونه که هست، جشن بگیرید. وقتی درک کنید هیچ کاستی و نقصی وجود ندارد، کل دنیا متعلق به شما خواهد بود. #لائو_تزو #تائو_ت_چینگ @taalibakhshi
❤4

Channel
@Taalibakhshi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,317subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001000301170 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Taalibakhshi |
| Created | 3 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Taalibakhshi |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 6,317 | +2 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 6,315 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 6,316 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 6,318 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 6,321 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 6,334 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 6,344 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 6,352 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 6,355 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 6,348 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 6,347 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 6,348 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 6,355 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 6,357 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:20 | 6,355 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 6,355 | first reading |
42 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 42 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
594 reactions across 36 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 438 | 73.7% | |
| 🕊 | 65 | 10.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 44 | 7.41% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 2.36% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 2.19% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 1.85% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 686 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
از آنچه دارید راضی باشید و زندگی را همان گونه که هست، جشن بگیرید. وقتی درک کنید هیچ کاستی و نقصی وجود ندارد، کل دنیا متعلق به شما خواهد بود. #لائو_تزو #تائو_ت_چینگ @taalibakhshi
❤4
آرتور با تعجب گفت: « البته سعی میکنم که نصیحت تو را بپذیرم ولی با این حال خیلی چیزها برای من ارزشمند است و دوست ندارم آنها را از دست بدهم.» مرلین پاسخ داد: « فقط کافی است کمی وارستگی پیشه کنی و از میزان این علاقه بکاهی، آن وقت خواهی دید آنچه را که تا این حد سعی در حفظ آن داشته ای، متعلق به گذشته بوده و پیش از این از بین رفته است. در لحظه بمیر تا حیاتی بی پایان را تجربه کنی.» 💫🕊 #دیپاک_چوپرا #اکسیر @taalibakhshi
❤12❤🔥3
در « ذراتِ » موسيقى"، براى كسانى كه بتوانند آنها راببينند و یاحس كنند، انرژى خاصى نهفته است كه گاهى به خود شكل مى گيرند وصحنه هايى راكه آهنك ساز هنگام ساختن أن آهنكَ در فكر ونيت خود داشته، دوباره متجلى مى سازند. اكر فكر ونيت آهنك ساز معنوى باشد، صحنه ها ملكوتى، واكر مادى و شهوانى باشند، صحنه ها مادى يا شهوانى خواهند شد. بنا بر اين، اثرات ناشى از موسيقى به طور اخص تابعى است از آهنكً ساز، اما به عوامل ديگرى از قبيل ن…
❤8👍1
«به تمام پیش آمدها به دیده نیکو بنگر و بدان که در پس آن چیزی نهفته است. از تمام وقایعی که به سوی تو میآیند با آغوش باز استقبال کن، حتی مرگ را که آخرین در آغوش کشیدن از زندگی است، پذیرا باش.» 💫🕊 #دیپاک_چوپرا #اکسیر @taalibakhshi
❤15🕊6🙏2
وقتی باور نمیکنیم که نوری درون ماست، درخشیدن برای دیگران سخت میشود. نوری در درون همه ی ماست، زیرا خداوند آن نور را آنجا قرار داده است. #ماریان_ویلیامسون #تعالی_بخشی
❤18🥰2🙏2👍1
کیمیاگر را غم از دست دادن نیست، چرا که او باور دارد هرآنچه غیر واقعی است، رفتنی است؛ اگر همه چیز خود را نیز از دست بدهید، باز هم واقعیت را خواهید داشت؛ در دل مشیت ها و از دست دادن ها، گنج های گران بها پنهان مانده است؛ وقتی به خاکستری نگاه می کنید، به دقت به آن بنگرید. ✨✨🕊 #دیپاک_چوپرا #اکسیر @taalibakhshi
❤17🕊5🙏3🔥1
زندگی مجموعه گردانی از توان نامحدود در لحظه است و ما خود هستیم که حاصلخیزی و اعجاز جهان را پرورش داده یا از آن امتناع میکنیم. تنها راه به دست آوردن یک زندگی هیجان انگیز، مشتاق بودن برای هیجان انگیز بودن است. تنها راه به دست آوردن عشق، اشتیاق به عشق ورزی است. ☘☘☘☘☘ #ماریان_ویلیامسون #تعالی_بخشی
❤14
ظریف ترین چیز در جهان بر سخت ترین غلبه میکند. این ارزش بی عملی را می نمایاند. آموزش بدون کلام و انجام دادن بدون عمل، شیوه ی فرزانه است. #لائو_تزو #تائو_ت_چینگ @taalibakhshi
❤12❤🔥4👍3
#موزیک_مدیتیشن
❤4
بزرگى را پرسیدند که: 🌱راه حقّ چونست؟ گفت: قدم در قدم نیست، 🌱امّا دل در دل است و جان در جان. بجان رو تا بدرگاه رسى، بدل رو تا بپیشگاه آیی.. کشف الاسرار @taalibakhshi☀️
❤🔥7❤5🙏2
اگر متابعت را نشان دهم، نومیدی آید بزرگان را. متابعت آن است که از امر ننالد؛ و اگر بنالد ترک متابعت نگوید. #مقالات_شمس ☀️ #تعالی_بخشی
❤🔥7❤2🙏1
شما درست به همان اندازه که در مورد پیرامون خویش از اطمینان کامل برخوردار هستید در مرزها و محدودیت ها محصور میشوید اما وقتی باور کنید واقعیت های پیرامون تان قطعی نیستند تازه به ویژگی های جدیدی از آن ها دست خواهید یافت . ⚡️🕊 #دیپاک_چوپرا #اکسیر @taalibakhshi
❤9🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @Taalibakhshi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تعالی بخشی” (@Taalibakhshi), 6,317 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Taalibakhshi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.