Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for گروه روانکاوی تداعی

Channel

گروه روانکاوی تداعی

@TadaeiGroup

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,221subscribers

+624 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001099159693
TypeChannel
Username@TadaeiGroup
Descriptionپشتیبانی تلگرام: @TadaeiSupport کلینیک: https://tadaei.com/clinic آموزش روانکاوی: https://tadaei.com/training مجله‌ روانکاوی https://tadaei.com/magazine ارتباط با ما: [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TadaeiGroup

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,5976,2245,910.56 August 2026 — 5,597 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,603 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,607 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,631 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,649 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,660 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,681 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,703 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,713 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,748 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,789 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,831 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,859 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,908 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,929 subscribers11 October 2026 — 5,950 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,965 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,971 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,980 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,169 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,213 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,224 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,221 subscribers6,2216 August 20262 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 87 days, net +624. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,503–6,318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 07:046,221-3
30 Oct 2026, 05:086,224+11
27 Oct 2026, 03:576,213+44
24 Oct 2026, 09:516,169+189
20 Oct 2026, 23:065,980+9
17 Oct 2026, 17:205,971+6
15 Oct 2026, 00:295,965+15
11 Oct 2026, 12:175,950+21
5 Oct 2026, 05:575,929+21
26 Sept 2026, 17:205,908+49
15 Sept 2026, 17:595,859+28
11 Sept 2026, 18:375,831+42
7 Sept 2026, 04:375,789+41
2 Sept 2026, 11:325,748+35
30 Aug 2026, 04:255,713+10
27 Aug 2026, 14:135,703+22
24 Aug 2026, 18:335,681+21
20 Aug 2026, 16:425,660+11
17 Aug 2026, 12:385,649+18
14 Aug 2026, 09:265,631first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 6,221 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,140
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held41 (29 May 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total8,568
Reactions total122
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 00:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
308
Videos
4
Links
733

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,179 reactions across 41 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤80368.1%
👍20517.4%
👏907.63%
👌332.80%
🔥110.933%
🙏90.763%
👎70.594%
💯50.424%
⚡20.17%
💔20.17%
💘20.17%
🤷‍♀20.17%
🦄20.17%
🏆10.085%
🕊10.085%
🤝10.085%
🤣10.085%
🤪10.085%
🥰10.085%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2026, 16:09 UTC908 views31 reactionsread 4 November 2026

کودکی که بیش از سن خود سنجیده رفتار می‌کند، ممکن است تجربه‌ای تروماتیک را از سر گذرانده باشد. شاندور فرنتسی، روانکاو مجار، در مقالهٔ پیشگام «آشفتگی زبان‌ها بین بزرگسالان و کودک» ایده‌هایی بی‌بدیل دربارهٔ ترومای کودکی و به طور خاص ترومای جنسی مطرح می‌کند. او می‌گوید گاه آنچه در یک کودک به‌صورت پختگی، فهم غیرمعمول یا توانایی مراقبت از دیگران ظاهر می‌شود، با تجربه‌هایی دردناک پیوند دارد. فرنتسی از پدیده‌ای سخن می‌گوید…

❤24👍7

10 Oct 2026, 16:27 UTC≈3,110 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026

سوژهٔ نارسیست ترجیح می‌دهد بمیرد، ولی به دیگری اعتبار ندهد. هربرت روزنفلد در مقاله‌ای می‌نویسد: در شدیدترین حالات نارسیسیزم، فرد می‌خواهد باور داشته باشد که زندگی‌اش را خودش به خود بخشیده و برای زنده‌ماندن و مراقبت از خود نیازی به دیگری ندارد. چنین افرادی هنگامی که با واقعیت وابستگی خود روبه‌رو می‌شوند، ممکن است چنان احساس تحقیر و شکست کنند که حتی مرگ را به پذیرش این وابستگی ترجیح دهند. گویی پذیرفتن اینکه دیگری در ز…

❤10👌5👍1👏1

5 Oct 2026, 15:37 UTC≈3,110 views35 reactionsread 4 November 2026

بزرگترین ترومایی که یک کودک تجربه می‌کند این است که متوجه می‌شود عشق او از سوی والدین‌اش پذیرفته نمی‌شود. رونالد فربرن، روانکاو فقید اسکاتلندی، در مقاله‌ای می‌نویسد: «بزرگ‌ترین نیاز یک کودک به دست آوردن این اطمینان قطعی است که (الف) او به‌عنوان یک شخص، صادقانه از سوی والدینش دوست داشته می‌شود، و (ب) که والدینش صادقانه عشق او را می‌پذیرند. اگر چنین اطمینانی حاصل شود او قادر خواهد بود با امنیت به اُبژه‌های واقعی خود و…

❤32👍3

2 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,490 views21 reactionsread 4 November 2026
File

متن کامل مقالهٔ «اضطراب انتقال و شکست پدران ما» نویسنده: پُل فرهاگه مترجم: خشایار داودی‌فر گروه روانکاوی تداعی

❤13👍6👏2

2 Oct 2026, 15:44 UTC≈2,310 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026

اضطراب انتقال و شکست پدران ما فرض من این است که ما جامعه‌ی روان‌نژندِ پدرسالار را با شبکه‌ی برادر بزرگ معاوضه کرده‌ایم. پدرسالاری به خصوص در نسخه‌ی مسیحی‌اش مبتنی بر شناخت و ایمان به موجودی برتر بود که در مقایسه با او، موجودات فانی همواره ناقص و گناهکار بوده‌اند. از این رو نیاز رایجی به کنترل از بالا به پایین وجود دارد. سوپرایگوی پدرسالار بر اساس همسان‌سازی با این نگاه خیره از اساس امری منع کننده است، از این رو تلاش…

❤13👍4👏3

29 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,080 views18 reactionsread 4 November 2026

پرخاشگری در ارتباط با رشد هیجانی کار مادام‌العمرِ مدیریت دنیای درونی، تا زمانی که کودک به‌خوبی در بدن خود ساکن نشده و قادر نشده است بین آنچه درون خودش است و آنچه بیرونی است، و بین آنچه واقعی است و آنچه فانتزی شخصی اوست تمایز بگذارد، نمی‌تواند آغاز شود. مدیریت او بر دنیای بیرونی به مدیریت دنیای درونی‌اش وابسته است. کودکی که به درجه‌ای از سازمان‌یافتگی شخصیت رسیده است با تجاربی روبه‌رو می‌شود که فراتر از توان اوست. ب…

❤15👍3

26 Sept 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,190 views19 reactionsread 4 November 2026

ساختار درون‌روانی بر مبنای روابط اُبژه‌ای لیبیدو در درجهٔ نخست اُبژه‌جو است، نه لذت‌جو، آن‌گونه که در نظریهٔ کلاسیک مطرح می‌شود؛ از این رو، منشأ نهایی شرایط آسیب‌شناختی را بایستی در پریشانی‌های موجود در روابط اُبژه‌ای ایگوی در حال رشد جست‌وجو کرد. می‌توان گفت درون‌فکنی اُبژه‌ها و، به‌ویژه، تداوم اُبژه‌های درون‌فکنی‌شده در واقعیت درونی، خود دلالتی بر اُبژه‌جو بودن ماهیت لیبیدو دارد؛ زیرا صرف حضور تکانه‌ها برای توضیح…

❤14👍5

22 Sept 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,520 views33 reactionsread 4 November 2026
File

متن کامل مقالهٔ «چشم‌انداز روانکاوی» نویسنده: هری گانتریپ ترجمه: جواد فرشباف زیوری گروه روانکاوی تداعی

❤22👍8👎1👏1🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,570 views21 reactionsread 4 November 2026

چشم‌انداز روانکاوی زندگی [دربارهٔ] چیست؟ زندگی دربارهٔ این است [یا باید دربارهٔ این باشد] که تمایل داشته باشیم ظرفیت‌های خلاقانهٔ خود را در جهت عشق و کار، با یکدیگر و برای یکدیگر، پرورش دهیم. این امر پاسخی است انسانی به امنیت و حس ارزشمندیِ اصیلی که دیگران برای ما فراهم کرده‌اند و ما را تشویق می‌کند که ما نیز این ملزومات گران‌بهای زندگیِ لذت‌بخش و معنادار را به دیگران منتقل کنیم. روان‌کاو باید کسی باشد که قادر است …

❤14👍7

21 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC≈2,430 views35 reactionsread 4 November 2026

«دوست داشتن یک اُبژه و بلعیدن او پیوندی بسیار نزدیک با هم دارند.» ملانی کلاین در مقالهٔ «ملاحظاتی در باب پیدایش روانی حالات مانیک-افسرده‌وار» به وضعیت‌هایی از دوران کودکی اشاره می‌کند که در آن، عشق و تملک دیگری به یکدیگر گره خورده‌اند. از آنجا که سازمان‌یابی روانی کودک در این مرحله «دهانی» است، شیوهٔ اصلی تعامل او با جهان از طریق دهان، و لاجرم با درونی‌سازی دیگری است. لذا عشق‌ورزی نیز شکل بلعیدن دیگری را به خود می‌گ…

❤32👌3

18 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC≈2,370 views22 reactionsread 4 November 2026

ماتم و رابطهٔ آن با حالات مانیک-افسرده‌وار در ماتم طبیعی، اضطراب‌های روان‌پریشانهٔ اولیه دوباره فعال می‌شوند؛ فرد ماتم‌زده در واقع بیمار است، اما چون این حالت ذهنی بسیار شایع است و برای ما بسیار طبیعی به نظر می‌رسد، ماتم را بیماری نمی‌نامیم. فرد در ماتم از حالتی مانیک-افسرده‌وار، تعدیل‌شده و گذرا عبور می‌کند و بر آن غلبه می‌یابد. بزرگ‌ترین خطر برای فرد ماتم‌زده از آنجا ناشی می‌شود که نفرتش متوجه خودِ فرد محبوبِ ازد…

❤13👍6👌2💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @TadaeiGroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کافه روانشناسی
@caferavanshenasi · 40,305
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
_poune_
@Poonehmoghimi · 42,725
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
کتاب صوتی
@ketabkadesoti · 33,870
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گروه روانکاوی تداعی” (@TadaeiGroup), 6,221 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TadaeiGroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.