باقي حسابات التقنية على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي
تويتر بالانكليزية: https://twitter.com/tech4peace1
مقالة ويكيبيديا: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tech_4_Peace
فيسبوك: https://facebook.com/Tech4Peace
تويتر بالعربية: http://twitter.com/IQtech4peace
t4p.co
Created
8 July 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
39 measurements spanning 69 days, net -636. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,186–34,012 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 20:35
33,281
-52
10 Oct 2026, 09:17
33,333
-66
6 Oct 2026, 03:55
33,399
-53
30 Sept 2026, 20:21
33,452
-112
18 Sept 2026, 06:39
33,564
-15
15 Sept 2026, 23:19
33,579
-10
14 Sept 2026, 08:56
33,589
-18
12 Sept 2026, 17:57
33,607
-20
10 Sept 2026, 15:00
33,627
-23
7 Sept 2026, 09:18
33,650
-24
4 Sept 2026, 14:00
33,674
-15
2 Sept 2026, 22:04
33,689
-8
1 Sept 2026, 23:38
33,697
-15
1 Sept 2026, 00:45
33,712
-8
30 Aug 2026, 21:28
33,720
-9
29 Aug 2026, 21:56
33,729
-11
29 Aug 2026, 00:48
33,740
-10
28 Aug 2026, 00:04
33,750
-4
26 Aug 2026, 21:25
33,754
-10
26 Aug 2026, 00:33
33,764
first reading
Engagement
214 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.89%
avg views ÷ 33,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,960
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.568%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
94
of 214 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 93 of 94 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held
214 (2 August 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total
184,132
Reactions total
1,042
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Oct 2026, 21:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,630
Videos
≈246
Links
≈11,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,308 reactions across 208 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,517
65.7%
❤
716
31.0%
👌
30
1.30%
🤩
29
1.26%
🆒
9
0.39%
🎉
7
0.303%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 213 of the 214 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 214 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Tech4peace. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 214 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 13 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#توضيح...
تداول عبر مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي خبرًا مفاده "لتقليص الإنفاق الحكومي مقترح نيابي باستقطاع 100 ألف دينار من رواتب الموظفين".
#التوضيح:
الخبر المتداول بشأن وجود مقترح نيابي لاستقطاع 100 ألف دينار من رواتب جميع الموظفين مضلل، إذ كان الاقتراح يقضي باستقطاع 100 ألف دينار شهريًا من رواتب الموظفين الذين تبلغ رواتبهم مليوني دينار عراقي فأكثر، بهدف تقليص الإنفاق الحكومي، وليس من رواتب جميع الموظفين.
إذ ظهر النائب…
#انتبه...
#خبر_مزيف...
تداول عبر مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي خبرًا مفاده "الفنان حسين نعمة في ذمة الله".
#الحقيقة:
الخبر المتداول بشأن وفاة الفنان حسين نعمة مزيف، إذ ظهر الفنان في مقطع فيديو ينفي فيه خبر وفاته،
عند التحقق من صحة الخبر المتداول، لم يعثر على أي مصدر موثوق يؤكده، إذ يخلو الحساب الرسمي لنقابة الفنانين العراقيين من أي إعلان مماثل، كما أن وسائل الإعلام المحلية لم تنشر أي خبر عن الوفاة، بالإضافة إلى ذلك، لم ت…
#انتبه...
#منشور_مزيف...
تداول عبر مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي صورة مرفقةً بنص مفاده "عاجل محاولة انقلاب داخل الرياض يقوده الشيخ مبارك بن نواف الدياسي ال سعود على مايبدو هناك خلافات عميقة وكبيرة داخل الاسره الحاكمة قد تتسبب بمقتل بن سلمان وتنهي حكمه".
#الحقيقة:
الشخص الظاهر في الصورة، الذي ادعى أنه يدعى الشيخ مبارك بن نواف الدياسي آل سعود، وأنه يقود محاولة انقلاب داخل الرياض، تبين أن صورته غير حقيقية، وأنها مولدة باستخد…
#انتبه...
تداول عبر مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي مقطع فيديو مرفقًا بنص مفاده "الان الحرس الثوري يجري مناورة واسعة النطاق داخل ايران تحسبا لاي هجوم امريكي".
#الحقيقة:
مقطع الفيديو المتداول، الذي زعم أنه يظهر إجراء الحرس الثوري الإيراني مناورة واسعة النطاق داخل إيران، تحسبًا لأي هجوم أمريكي، مضلل، إذ تبين أنه قديم ويعود إلى عام 2025، وليس حديثًا كما زعم.
قمنا بالتحقق من الفيديو من خلال إجراء بحث عكسي لعدة لقطات منه، حيث ت…
#انتبه...
تداول عبر مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي مقطع فيديو مرفقًا بنص مفاده "اللحظات الأولى للهجوم على مطار الملك خالد الدولي في الرياض وسط حصيلة معلنة بلغت 12 قتيلاً وأكثر من 300 مصاب".
#الحقيقة:
على الرغم من وقوع هجوم على مطار الملك خالد الدولي في الرياض وسقوط عدد من القتلى والجرحى، فإن مقطع الفيديو المتداول، الذي يزعم أنه يظهر اللحظات الأولى للهجوم، غير حقيقي، إذ تبين أنه مولد باستخدام تقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي.
قمنا …
#انتبه...
#تحذير...
تداول مستخدمون عبر تطبيق "تليغرام" رسالة تزعم منح جوائز مالية للمستخدمين مقابل الاشتراك في قناة تنتحل صفة مصرف الرشيد وتدعي أنها تابعة له.
#الحقيقة:
الرسالة احتيالية، إذ تزعم منح جوائز مالية للمستخدمين مقابل الاشتراك في قناة مزيفة على تطبيق "تليغرام"، تنتحل صفة مصرف الرشيد وتدعي أنها تابعة له.
قمنا بالتحقق من الادعاء من خلال البحث في الموقع الإلكتروني الرسمي لمصرف الرشيد، إلى جانب مراجعة حساباته…
#انتبه...
#فوتوشوب...
تداول عبر مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي صورة مرفقة بنص مفاده "احدث صورة للفنان عادل امام".
#الحقيقة:
الصورة المتداولة، التي زُعم أنها تظهر أحدث ظهور للفنان عادل إمام، مزيفة، إذ تبيّن أنها عُدّلت باستخدام تقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي، فيما يعود المقطع الأصلي الذي اقتُطعت منه الصورة إلى الفنان الهندي سليم خان.
قمنا بفحص الصورة المتداولة باستخدام أدوات متخصصة في تحليل الصور، وأظهرت النتائج أن الصورة غير حقي…
👍11❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 214 posts we hold for @Tech4peace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
امبراطورية التحشيش العراقية @memsss_iq · 18,076#72
امبراطورية الافلام العراقية @moviess_iq · 21,957#73
ملحدو العراق Atheists of Iraq @IQ_Atheists · 2,883#74
قناة الدفاع عن الشيعة | Apologetics @akefivemc · 5,077#75
المكتب الاعلامي لرئيس الوزراء 🇮🇶 @IraqiPmo · 27,771#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Steven Nabil ستيفن نبيل @StevenNabilIraq · 182,618 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
من بغداد @MnBaghdad24 · 36,996 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
الترا عراق | Ultra Iraq @ULIQUltraIraq · 34,402 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
الخطوط الجوية العراقية | IRAQIAIRWAYS @iraqiairways2 · 19,691 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 September 2026
الخوة النظيفة @BROTHERSIRQ · 221,870 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
من طيزي @mntez · 56,449 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
الأمانة العامة لمجلس الوزراء @cabinetmedia · 86,510 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
المديرية العامة لتربية نينوى الإعلام والاتصال الحكومي @NinevehEducationMedia · 29,650 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
المفوضية العليا المستقلة للانتخابات 🇮🇶 @IHECOfficail · 131,184 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
محافظة بغداد Baghdad governorate @MediaofficeoftheGB · 43,962 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
مصرف الرافدين @rafidainbank · 58,631 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
شبكة الإعلام العراقي @IraqiMediaNetwork · 31,199 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tech 4 Peace التقنية من اجل السلام” (@Tech4peace), 33,281 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tech4peace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.