Our main channel has been banned, so from now on, weโll be doing most of our work here. Every punter, please stay connected and keep supporting us by sharing our links. Your support means a lot to us, so letโs stay united and keep growing together.๐ https://t.me/originalthemars

Channel
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ
@TheMarsTossOriginal
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท View velocity ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
921,527subscribers
+862,666 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 316,228โ1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001574210560 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheMarsTossOriginal |
| Description | ๐ซ No Illegal Betting ๐ Educational Purpose Only โ ๏ธ Following Local Laws Strictly |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheMarsTossOriginal |
Topic
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 921,527 | -9,233 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 930,760 | -9,320 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 940,080 | -14,085 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:30 | 954,165 | -11,176 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 965,341 | -2,832 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 968,173 | -3,996 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 972,169 | -1,316 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 973,485 | -2,512 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 975,997 | -9,150 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 985,147 | -14,374 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 999,521 | -22,510 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 1,022,031 | -34,377 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 1,056,408 | -33,703 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 1,090,111 | +965,422 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 124,689 | -32 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:42 | 124,721 | +92,641 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 32,080 | -94 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 32,174 | -111 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 32,285 | -207 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 32,492 | first reading |
Engagement
550 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 1.31%
- avg views รท 921,527 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,100
- 180 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.41%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 180
- of 550 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 180 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 550 (2 August 2026 โ 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,175,570 |
| Reactions total | 441 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 06:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- โ6,540
- Videos
- โ37
- Links
- โ3
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 25 October 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 06s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channelโs own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all โ a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 118 of this channelโs own posts over the last 30 days: across 56 of this channelโs own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 5.8 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 14.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 53.4% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 23,000 views โ 2.18% of this channelโs own subscriber count (90th percentile 23,400).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /12096513 Oct 2026, 03:20 UTC | 420 minutes โ 86 minutes old | 4,020 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 3,204 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 36 minutesprovisional โ final view count still climbing |
| /12096412 Oct 2026, 22:47 UTC | 828 minutes โ 4.3 hours old | 9,020 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 2,930 โ 3.0 hours: 6,575 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.9 hoursprovisional โ final view count still climbing |
| /12096312 Oct 2026, 22:47 UTC | 828 minutes โ 4.3 hours old | 9,010 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 2,768 interp. โ 3.0 hours: 6,581 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.9 hoursprovisional โ final view count still climbing |
| /12096212 Oct 2026, 17:21 UTC | 1819 minutes โ 9.7 hours old | 17,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 3,245 interp. โ 3.0 hours: 6,850 โ 6.0 hours: 11,300still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.2 hoursprovisional โ final view count still climbing |
| /12096112 Oct 2026, 17:20 UTC | 1820 minutes โ 9.7 hours old | 17,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 3,285 interp. โ 3.0 hours: 6,870 โ 6.0 hours: 11,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.2 hoursprovisional โ final view count still climbing |
| /12096012 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC | 1824 minutes โ 9.8 hours old | 17,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 3,290 โ 3.0 hours: 6,771 interp. โ 6.0 hours: 11,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.2 hoursprovisional โ final view count still climbing |
| /12095912 Oct 2026, 17:15 UTC | 1825 minutes โ 9.8 hours old | 17,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 3,320 โ 3.0 hours: 6,824 interp. โ 6.0 hours: 11,500still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.2 hoursprovisional โ final view count still climbing |
| /12095812 Oct 2026, 17:15 UTC | 1826 minutes โ 9.8 hours old | 17,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 3,380 โ 3.0 hours: 6,823 interp. โ 6.0 hours: 11,500still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.2 hoursprovisional โ final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) โ measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a postโs view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far โ an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since โhalf of finalโ is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
4,570 reactions across 46 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 2,928 | 64.1% | |
| ๐ฅ | 552 | 12.1% | |
| ๐ | 337 | 7.37% | |
| ๐ | 145 | 3.17% | |
| ๐ | 127 | 2.78% | |
| ๐ฉ | 63 | 1.38% | |
| ๐ | 55 | 1.20% | |
| ๐คฃ | 50 | 1.09% | |
| ๐ | 46 | 1.01% | |
| ๐คก | 45 | 0.985% | |
| ๐คฌ | 35 | 0.766% | |
| ๐ | 32 | 0.7% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 30 | 0.656% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 21 | 0.46% | |
| ๐ข | 15 | 0.328% | |
| ๐พ | 8 | 0.175% | |
| ๐ญ | 7 | 0.153% | |
| ๐ | 7 | 0.153% | |
| ๐ | 7 | 0.153% | |
| ๐ณ | 7 | 0.153% | |
| 12 further kinds | 53 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 550 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 4,570 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 550 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
MOOD SAHI NHIโฆ GOOD NIGHT๐ MARS BAD DAY CHAL RAHA JISKO SATH RHNA HAI RAHO JISKA MAN HAI JA SKTE HO..
The 3rd Toss of the Challenge.
TOSS WINNER PEARTH SCORCHERS WOMENโ
Just know that Iโll give my best over these 7 days.
Donโt Take Any Toss in This Challenge Lightly, and Donโt Make the Mistake of Missing Any of Them, Because Iโm Personally Playing at 5 Lakh Per Toss Every Day. Losses Are Possible, But My Goal Is to Help You Achieve an Overall Profit of 7 Limits by Monday.
Done.๐
The 2nd Toss of the Challenge.
Photo, posted without a caption
ATTENTION ALL???
IT'S ALL HERE ONLY ON PLAYBAAZI ๐ฅ Best Casino Experience Playbaazi.xyz ๐ฐ No Cyber Attacks ๐ฐ Trusted by lakh of clients ๐ฐ All UPI & Bank transfer Available ๐ฐ All are in one platform ๐ฐ Fastest service in India ๐ฐOne click to place Bet ๐ฐAll languages customer service available โ โ โ Playbaazi.xyz ๐ โ โ โ Playbaazi.xyz ๐ โฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏโฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธ https://t.me/+CAIPcW_F-iFjZjQ1
Koi Toss Hi Nhi Milte Hai Kal..๐
Showing the 12 most recent of 550 posts we hold for @TheMarsTossOriginal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@LEAKEREXPRESS ยท 57,833#1
@TOSSKING_AVDHUT ยท 25,314#2
@CRICBOUNCERTOSSLINE ยท 13,414#3
@TOSS_KING_AVDHUT_ECS_KING ยท 15,381#4
@bettingrajaofficialchanal ยท 45,621#5
@DreamerTossline ยท 1,503#6
@theDestroyerOriginal ยท 77,652 (as read 5 September 2026)#7
@crictossline21 ยท 116,590#8
@SonyLine ยท 52,977#9
@QueenTheBrandOriginal ยท 8,286#10
@Noloss100percentProfit ยท 45,008#11
@Winning_Zone09 ยท 39,366#12
@Betfairtosslines ยท 58,953#13
@ambani_mam01 ยท 1,863#14
@ARYANTHEBRANDTOSS ยท 65,978#15
@LEAKEREXPRESS_MATCH_LEAKER ยท 23,168#16
@SUDHA_THE_BRAND_2017 ยท 37,381#17
@MUMBAITOSSLINE ยท 42,164#18
@MONEY_MAKER_REAL_ORIGINAL ยท 27,316#19
@BetfairTossbookOrignal ยท 29,469#20
@BETFAIRTRACKING ยท 1,909#21
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@incme_toss_fixer ยท 21,827
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 22 here โ alongside 21 others โ read 17 September 2026
@Toss_King_Mafiya_Real ยท 24,574
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 23 here โ alongside 22 others โ read 13 September 2026
@SUDHA_THE_BRAND_2017 ยท 37,381
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 19 here โ alongside 18 others โ read 12 September 2026
@toss_king_ajaya_raj_mafiya ยท 28,453
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 14 here โ alongside 13 others โ read 6 September 2026
@sulemannnnnnnnnnnnnn ยท 39,565
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 34 here โ alongside 33 others โ read 5 September 2026
@Tosse_King_Ajaya ยท 33,101
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 19 here โ alongside 18 others โ read 1 September 2026
@toss_king_ajaya_mafia_jupiter ยท 39,100
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here โ alongside 60 others โ read 27 August 2026
@Raftaardubai_Raftaar ยท 69,061
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 51 here โ alongside 50 others โ read 27 August 2026
@DTLLEAKER_ORIGINAL ยท 111,163
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here โ alongside 57 others โ read 20 August 2026
@bettingrajaofficialchanal ยท 45,621
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 24 here โ alongside 23 others โ read 25 September 2026
@MELBET_MEGAPARI_1WIN ยท 36,996
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 40 here โ alongside 39 others โ read 1 September 2026
@TOSS_KA_BOSS_MONEY_MAKER ยท 74,126
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 19 here โ alongside 18 others โ read 1 September 2026
@RaviTeja_South_Indian_Tipper ยท 7,667
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here โ alongside 53 others โ read 20 August 2026
@tosskingajju ยท 23,251
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 33 here โ alongside 32 others โ read 15 September 2026
@Bugatti_Toss_Line ยท 30,272
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 25 here โ alongside 24 others โ read 5 September 2026
@TOSSKING_AVDHUT ยท 25,314
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 20 here โ alongside 19 others โ read 5 September 2026
@HEENA_MAM ยท 33,435
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 28 here โ alongside 27 others โ read 3 September 2026
@ThirdUmpire3rdTossOwner ยท 52,983
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 15 here โ alongside 14 others โ read 1 September 2026
@LEAKEREXPRESS ยท 57,833
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 21 here โ alongside 20 others โ read 29 August 2026
@GROUND_IPL_LIVE_LINE ยท 35,398
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 53 here โ alongside 52 others โ read 27 August 2026
@GOD_OF_LOAD_ORIGINAL ยท 41,674
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here โ alongside 56 others โ read 26 August 2026
@REBELTHEBRANDBACKUP ยท 53,598
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here โ alongside 46 others โ read 24 August 2026
@ARYANTHEBRANDTOSS ยท 65,978
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here โ alongside 55 others โ read 22 August 2026
@Ipl_Live_Score_IPL ยท 69,320
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here โ alongside 56 others โ read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 135 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฉโ (@TheMarsTossOriginal), 921,527 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheMarsTossOriginal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.