🇮🇪Ireland (Playing XI)🇮🇪:- Paul Stirling (c), Andrew Balbirnie, Cade Carmichael, Harry Tector, Lorcan Tucker (wk), Curtis Campher, George Dockrell, Andy McBrine, Gavin Hoey, Liam McCarthy, Jai Moondra 🇳🇦Namibia (Playing XI)🇳🇦:- Malan Kruger, Lauren Steenkamp, Jan Frylinck, Gerhard Erasmus (c), Nicol Loftie-Eaton, Alexander Busing Volschenk, Zane Green (wk), JJ Smit, Ruben Trumpelmann, Bernard Scholtz, Jack Brassell

Channel
CRICTOSS LINE ™
@crictossline21
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
116,266subscribers
+64,619 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001153994617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crictossline21 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2018 and 31 May 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crictossline21 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:05 | 116,266 | -227 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 116,493 | -97 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 116,590 | -167 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 116,757 | -108 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:30 | 116,865 | -191 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 117,056 | -257 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 117,313 | -117 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:46 | 117,430 | -81 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 117,511 | -121 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:28 | 117,632 | -42 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 117,674 | -107 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:30 | 117,781 | -144 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 117,925 | -97 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 11:51 | 118,022 | -505 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 118,527 | -1,060 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:58 | 119,587 | -1,276 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 120,863 | +20,020 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 100,843 | -89 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 100,932 | -64 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 100,996 | first reading |
Engagement
2,131 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 263 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.20%
- avg views ÷ 116,266 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,210
- 787 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 789
- of 2,131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,131 (5 August 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 5,671,519 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Oct 2026, 07:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🇳🇦 NAMIBIA 🇳🇦 HAVE WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL FIRST ✔️✔️
Team Changes ⭐️ India: The visitors are going with an unchanged XI. New Zealand: 3 changes for the hosts. Kyle Jamieson, Matthew Fisher and Adam Milne come in for Lockie Ferguson, Matt Henry and Nathan Smith
🇳🇿New Zealand (Playing XI)🇳🇿: Tim Seifert (w), Finn Allen, Daryl Mitchell, Glenn Phillips, Bevon Jacobs, Michael Bracewell, Mitchell Santner (c), Kyle Jamieson, Adam Milne, Jacob Duffy, Matthew Fisher 🇮🇳India (Playing XI)🇮🇳: Sanju Samson (w), Abhishek Sharma, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi, Shreyas Iyer (c), Tilak Varma, Nitish Kumar Reddy, Naman Dhir, Axar Patel, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Arshdeep Singh, Prince Yadav
Toss streak alive: 3/3 in the series 🎯 With a 2-0 lead in hand, the Men in Blue look to restrict the Black Caps and seal the series in the chase!
#NZvsIND: India won the toss and opted to bowl first against New Zealand in the third T20I.
🇮🇳 INDIA 🇮🇳 HAVE WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL FIRST ✔️✔️
TOSS TIME ✔️✔️ #NZvIND🇮🇳🇳🇿
🇵🇬 PAPUA NEW GUINEA 🇵🇬 HAVE WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL FIRST ✔️✔️
🇰🇼 KUWAIT 🇰🇼 HAVE WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL FIRST ✔️✔️
🇳🇵BIRATNAGAR KINGS🇳🇵HAVE WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL FIRST ✔️✔️
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,131 posts we hold for @crictossline21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@crictossline21 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 1 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@SonyLine · 52,884#1
@CRICBOUNCERTOSSLINE · 13,413#2
@KINGTOSSLINE111 · 34,303#3
@TheMarsTossOriginal · 909,702#4
@DTLLEAKER_ORIGINAL · 111,056#5
@punterstossline · 6,767#6
@GOD_OF_LOAD_ORIGINAL · 79,470#7
@TossKi_Rani · 92,369#8
@TOSS_VIDEOIPL · 454#9
@EagleTossLine1 · 22,925#10
@GOD_TOSS_LINE_ORIGINAL · 7,336#11
@Mrf_Toss_Linee · 79,762#12
@masihatossline · 6,986#13
@LEAKEREXPRESS · 57,801#14
@Market_Toss_Load_Ranga_Rao · 92,779#15
@MUMBAITOSSLINE · 42,155#16
@DreamerTossline · 1,506#17
@MARSTOSSLINE · 8,847#18
@HITLERSLINE · 21,073#19
@Betfairtosslines · 58,955#20
@shanvimem · 56,697#21
@fastesttossline2011 · 21,233#22
@puniatossload_no1 · 45,118#23
@RIHANSHBHAI · 42,598#24
@VIP_TOSS_LOAD · 39,284#25
@IplTosslinedubai · 2,211#26
@KingTossBook_Official · 27,691#27
@OFFICIALLINE7 · 3,503#28
@MagicalMars · 7,664 (as read 21 August 2026)#29
@biggggba · 2,102#30
@PrinceTossline510 · 1,152#31
@RebelTossLineOfficial · 7,593#32
@ALL_TOSS_LOAD_AVAILABLE · 111,378#33
@SAMRAATTOSS · 2,868#34
@ambani_mam01 · 1,863#35
@ABDCRICKETOFFICIAL · 1,810#36
@ZOOM_TOSS_FIXER_ORIGINAL · 1,734#37
@CRICTOSSLINE · 52,640#38
@internationaltossloadd · 85,589#39
@SKYTOSSLOAD · 38,670#40
@FancodeLoad111 · 10,931#41
@OFFICIALTOSSLINE · 280#42
@tossfixer_tossload · 99,833#43
@TOSSLEAK_LEKER · 3,289#44
@MONEY_MAKER_REAL_ORIGINAL · 27,074#45
@ARYAN_THE_BRAND_MATCHH · 75,898#46
@BetfairTossbookOrignal · 29,468#47
@ARYANTHEBRANDTOSS · 65,894#48
@TOSSKING_AVDHUT · 25,031#49
@TOSS_KING_AVDHUT_ECS_KING · 15,367#50
@REBELTHEBRANDBACKUP · 53,597#51
@AnuragxCricket · 1,921,706#52
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,445,663#53
@BETFAIRTRACKING · 1,909#54
@SlayerTossLine · 550#55
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@GROUND_IPL_LIVE_LINE · 34,451
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
@EagleTossLine1 · 22,925
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 5 October 2026
@TIGERTOSSLINEE · 21,284
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 20 September 2026
@RealFarrariLinee · 54,992
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
@SonyLine · 52,884
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 August 2026
@mibook · 75,411
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 August 2026
@ipl_toss_match_fixer · 70,402
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 August 2026
@CRICTOSSLINE · 52,640
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 26 September 2026
@Malik_Mumbaibhai1 · 21,998
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 21 September 2026
@Tosskingrazz · 23,438
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 18 September 2026
@Tossqueen1 · 23,602
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 18 September 2026
@Honey_Cricket_Prediction · 157,569
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 22 August 2026
@Livee_scoree_Line · 113,617
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 August 2026
@marvel_prediction1 · 23,512
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 17 September 2026
@Bugatti_Toss_Line · 30,240
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 5 September 2026
@Saurabhcricketx · 38,036
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 31 August 2026
@MUMBAITOSSLINE · 42,155
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 28 August 2026
@Gullycricket_in · 22,587
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 17 September 2026
@drdiamondexch · 67,939
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
@VSRPOWERR · 103,457
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
@rajan_ds · 120,461
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 August 2026
@crickettline · 93,272
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
@bababaazigaripl · 31,619
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 5 September 2026
@bignrand · 52,428
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 89 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRICTOSS LINE ™” (@crictossline21), 116,266 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crictossline21.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.