Kya Chal Raha Bhai Log? Patte Khelne ki Taiyari Chal Rhi?❤️😂 Badhiya Hai Tum Log ka Mai to Online Khel Raha🥲🙏

Channel
Anurag Dwivedi 🏏
@AnuragxCricket
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,895,558subscribers
-212,410 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001296541353 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AnuragxCricket |
| Description | YouTuber : Cricket Content Creator🙌 @ApkaApnaAnurag Cricket Stats and Analysis. All Content for Informational and Educational Purpose only. No Guarantee, No Promotion of Gambling, Play responsibly |
| Created | 10 March 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AnuragxCricket |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 07:18 | 1,895,558 | -3,932 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:55 | 1,899,490 | -2,932 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:18 | 1,902,422 | -1,776 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:41 | 1,904,198 | -2,789 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:28 | 1,906,987 | -1,711 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:19 | 1,908,698 | -2,020 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:36 | 1,910,718 | -1,626 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:09 | 1,912,344 | -2,173 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 1,914,517 | -2,057 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 1,916,574 | -1,175 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 1,917,749 | -1,999 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 1,919,748 | -1,958 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 1,921,706 | -1,381 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:11 | 1,923,087 | -1,497 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 1,924,584 | -1,264 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:06 | 1,925,848 | -1,899 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:34 | 1,927,747 | -2,455 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 1,930,202 | -3,336 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:59 | 1,933,538 | -2,814 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 1,936,352 | first reading |
Engagement
512 posts held, back to 10 March 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2,131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.45%
- avg views ÷ 1,895,558 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 46,400
- 340 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 340
- of 512 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 512 (10 March 2021 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 15,790,021 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 22:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 12
- Videos
- 29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 13m 31s
- Average length
- 58s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 340 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: a typical post has already reached 18.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 41.2% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 78,600 views — 4.15% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 99,800).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /735148 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC | 1211 minutes – 7.0 hours old | 26,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 16,521 interp. → 3.0 hours: 23,100 → 6.0 hours: 26,033 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 36 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /735138 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC | 1532 minutes – 9.1 hours old | 40,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 17,852 interp. → 3.0 hours: 27,634 interp. → 6.0 hours: 34,600still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 82 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /735118 Nov 2026, 03:03 UTC | 62 minutes – 3.1 hours old | 28,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 16,800 → 3.0 hours: 28,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 46 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /735107 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC | 4115 minutes – 24 hours old | 72,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 2,245 interp. → 3.0 hours: 4,120 → 6.0 hours: 16,700 → 12 hours: 52,400 → 24 hours: 72,800still climbing at last reading | 72,800measured | 8.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /735097 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC | 3919 minutes – 23 hours old | 75,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 19,058 interp. → 3.0 hours: 30,976 interp. → 6.0 hours: 37,300 → 12 hours: 43,300 → 24 hours: 75,600still climbing at last reading | 75,600measured | 6.3 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /735087 Nov 2026, 08:24 UTC | 4215 minutes – 24 hours old | 82,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 20,780 interp. → 3.0 hours: 31,500 → 6.0 hours: 45,600 → 12 hours: 60,800 → 24 hours: 82,800still climbing at last reading | 82,800measured | 5.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /735077 Nov 2026, 03:57 UTC | 813 minutes – 4.1 hours old | 42,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 24,777 interp. → 3.0 hours: 37,600still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 43 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /735067 Nov 2026, 02:47 UTC | 1017 minutes – 5.3 hours old | 52,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 20,319 interp. → 3.0 hours: 43,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 80 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 340 posts held from the last 30 days (1.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇮🇳India vs Pakistan🇵🇰 Match Chal Raha Hai U19 Wala😍 Diwali Hai India Jeetegi Aaram se aur Virendra Sehwag ka Beta Khel Raha Hai Abhi😉🙌
Good Diwali Morning Guys, Mai to Soya Hi Nahi WBBL Ka Match Dekh Raha Hoon😂 Sydney Thunders ko Support Kar Raha Aaj Sixers Ke Samne, Chase Dekhne me Maza Aayega🫶😉
Happy Diwali Hai Sabko Meri Taraf se, Ghar Par Raho Poora Time Family Ko Do aur Khushi se Tyohaar Manao, Pelke Patakhe Dagao, Ache Kapde Paheno aur Sabko Pahenao, Acha Khao aur Sabko Khilao, Gaanv - Kasba - Mohalla me Jo log Saksham Nahi Hain Unke Sath bhi Khushiyaan Baato, Jinse Anban Ho Gayi Hai Unke Paas Jao aur Gale Lagao, Lights Apke Ghar Ki Dewaaro Par Nahi Jeevan Me Honi Chahiye Life Should be Full of Lights, …
T10 League Dekhne ka Alag Hi Maza Hai Abhi Wale Match me Badhiya Defend Dekhne Ko Milega😍 Emirates Eagles🫶
Fun to Hoga Abu Dhabi T10 Me Aaj se😍 Roj 3 Match aur Har Over me Hota Hai Game Change🙌😉
Ye Indian Bowlers Ko Kya Hua Hai 😂 Tension mat lena , Comeback Karegi NZ ❤️
Toss Ho Gaya Hai 😍 Ready Sab? 🥳
Baap re Baap Kal 7 Match🥲 Subah 7:30 AM se NZ🇳🇿 vs IND🇮🇳 2 WBBL Match✅ 3 Abu Dhabi T10 Match🇦🇪 1 Nepal T20🇳🇵 Maza Aayega❤️😘
Sydney Sixers Ko Support Karenge WBBL Mai 😍❤️
Aaj Ka Ho Gaya Ab Kal Milta Hu Bahot Mast Match Hain Kal Bhi😘🔥 Love You Sabko❤️🫶 APK Install Kar Lena FanPlay Ka🤞 Royal Branch aur GiftCode Thodi Der me Aa Jayega🙌 Mai Chala Ghummi Ghummi Karne London🇬🇧✈️
De Diya Bolke Bada Jackpot😘😉 Ek aur Jackpot Hai Aaj🤞 Join Kar Lo Pariwar Channel🙏🫶
Showing the 12 most recent of 512 posts we hold for @AnuragxCricket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AnuragxCricket edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 27 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @AnuragxCricket as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 29 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@SomeshThakreTg · 355,376#1
@cricinformer · 251,474#2
@AakashChopraOfficial · 174,074#3
@bestpick · 83,530#4
@billabombay · 61,574#5
@Rishanktips · 70,230#6
@fantasyteammakerskills · 6,679#7
@TheMarsTossOriginal · 860,598#8
@deathovers33 · 9,536#9
@Devendra89Yadav · 8,530#10
@DTLLEAKER_ORIGINAL · 110,926#11
@YouKnowWhoIAm_Official · 128#12
@Tanay100 · 99,609#13
@Bk_Roy_vipin_Singh · 202,421#14
@sfgfamily · 73,031#15
@velaniparthofficial · 70,285#16
@FantasyLossCover · 117,101#17
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,428,900#18
@aman123456778 · 4,287#19
@KINGTOSSLINE111 · 34,182#20
@domesticlogic · 2,797#21
@vsgline2 · 107,470#22
@CRICDJ · 20,076#23
@Team_Six_T6 · 4,847#24
@premiumteamsleak · 6,883#25
@dhonifantasysports · 6,928#26
@ShivamSporting · 6,172#27
@Mahakal_Family_Mini_GL_King_Join · 50,108 (as read 8 August 2026)#28
@stoningstar29 · 837#29
@BOMBAYMARKETLOADOFFICIAL · 108,619#30
@souravsamajik84 · 32,911#31
@mcpyoutube · 48,405#32
@Mousabos112 · 5,709#33
@BINDASHRKG91 · 24,058#34
@Marketload57 · 8,788#35
@UKMWIMD · 45,261#36
@khatridxb · 59,309#37
@fantasygram7 · 50,103#38
@iamvsg · 1,925,559#39
@dogs · 6,451,094#40
@hamster_kombat · 19,644,695#41
@tomarket_ai · 5,915,212#42
@CryptoKingKeyur · 598,015#43
@Cats_housewtf · 7,037,059#44
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,558,972#45
@mastercryptohq · 256,843#46
@next10xgem1 · 321,206#47
@Onmaastaywithme · 4,382#48
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 132,330#49
@MONEY_MAKER_REAL_ORIGINAL · 25,957#50
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cricgram · 18,286
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 October 2026
@Baadshah · 21,244
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 1 October 2026
@cricket11newsjoin · 20,465
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 22 September 2026
@ram_ji_Bhajans · 22,828
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 17 September 2026
@F_W_Official · 22,744
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 16 September 2026
@cricket_aryan_betting_guruji · 121,626
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 12 September 2026
@Alwayswinner007 · 25,245
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 11 September 2026
@bababaazigaripl · 31,377
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 5 September 2026
@baba_mastan · 30,933
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 5 September 2026
@Cricinformer_Informer · 31,872
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 4 September 2026
@pawan_jaipur · 84,160
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 1 September 2026
@fantasycricketpredictiongood · 36,543
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 30 August 2026
@Tenis_Jasoos · 27,187
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 29 August 2026
@KOHLIPREDICTION · 28,428
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 29 August 2026
@BKFANTASY1 · 38,044
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 28 August 2026
@Cricinforrmerx · 44,367
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 27 August 2026
@Perfectwinofficial · 42,396
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@Dream11Teamsfree8 · 44,295
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026
@FantasySyndicate · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
@FTH877 · 53,714
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
@BazzigarRealBazzigar · 92,650
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 22 August 2026
@FantasyKingvj · 55,599
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 22 August 2026
@LASER_BULLET_FERRARI_APPLE_LINE · 62,763
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 August 2026
@billabombay · 61,574
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 252 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anurag Dwivedi 🏏” (@AnuragxCricket), 1,895,558 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnuragxCricket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.