Good Night Everyone Ek baat bolu....itna inactive hoon last 1-2 mahine se....phir bhi Roz Kam se Kam 600-700 sirf Love you ke messages aate hai in my Instagram. Na mein kuch fayada de raha kisi ko...na kisi ke Kuch kaam aa raha phir bhi itne love you aate hai...yeh dekh ke lagta hai ki UN sab ke liye kuch bhi kar jau... Hey Bhagwan mujhe itna kabil bana do ki kabhi kisi ko kisi chiz ke liye mana na kar pau....give…

Channel
Ranbir Roy (VSG)
@RANBIRROYOFFICE
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
2,352,061subscribers
+238,811 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001119298491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RANBIRROYOFFICE |
| Description | Sports Analyst | Entrepreneur My Verified Telegram Link https://t.me/RANBIRROYOFFICE |
| Created | 4 March 2017 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RANBIRROYOFFICE |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 2,352,061 | -6,431 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 2,358,492 | -28,573 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 2,387,065 | -5,666 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 2,392,731 | +4,763 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 2,387,968 | +32,444 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 2,355,524 | +20,333 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 2,335,191 | +53,785 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:09 | 2,281,406 | +8,546 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:16 | 2,272,860 | -4,063 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:14 | 2,276,923 | -1,759 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 2,278,682 | +16,035 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 2,262,647 | +9,909 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 2,252,738 | +32,864 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,219,874 | +100,525 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 2,119,349 | +62,992 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 2,056,357 | +3,710 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 2,052,647 | +870 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 2,051,777 | +14,258 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 2,037,519 | -22,813 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 2,060,332 | first reading |
Engagement
730 posts held, back to 4 March 2017 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2,652 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.96%
- avg views ÷ 2,352,061 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 69,700
- 88 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 88
- of 730 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 730 (4 March 2017 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,129,717 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 18:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 30
- Videos
- 110
- Links
- 52
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 39m 02s
- Average length
- 2m 03s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 82 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 26 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 71 minutes of being posted; a typical post has already reached 53.1% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 81.6% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 85,050 views — 3.62% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 97,050).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /2498615 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTC | 9819 minutes – 4 days old | 35,900 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 24,248 interp. → 3.0 hours: 25,300 → 6.0 hours: 25,700 → 12 hours: 27,500 → 24 hours: 30,200 → 2 days: 32,700still climbing at last reading | 30,200measured | 19 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /2498415 Sept 2026, 07:34 UTC | 4531 minutes – 26 hours old | 70,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 59,028 interp. → 3.0 hours: 63,240 interp. → 6.0 hours: 64,441 interp. → 12 hours: 68,600 → 24 hours: 70,500still climbing at last reading | 70,500measured | 31 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /2498315 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC | 5716 minutes – 34 hours old | 70,900 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 60,253 interp. → 3.0 hours: 63,100 → 6.0 hours: 64,600 → 12 hours: 67,400 → 24 hours: 69,400still climbing at last reading | 69,400measured | 16 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /2498214 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC | 714 minutes – 2 days old | 88,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 59,506 interp. → 3.0 hours: 62,598 interp. → 6.0 hours: 63,300 → 12 hours: 64,100 → 24 hours: 85,000 → 2 days: 88,100still climbing at last reading | 85,000measured | 30 minutes |
| /2498114 Sept 2026, 11:56 UTC | 12527 minutes – 5 days old | 93,100 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 58,000 → 3.0 hours: 59,900 → 6.0 hours: 63,000 → 12 hours: 63,900 → 24 hours: 84,700 → 2 days: 87,500still climbing at last reading | 84,700measured | 27 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /2498014 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC | 12430 minutes – 5 days old | 93,700 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 58,500 → 3.0 hours: 60,200 → 6.0 hours: 63,300 → 12 hours: 64,200 → 24 hours: 85,100 → 2 days: 88,100still climbing at last reading | 85,100measured | 30 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /2497914 Sept 2026, 09:41 UTC | 7625 minutes – 2 days old | 89,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 58,310 interp. → 3.0 hours: 60,612 interp. → 6.0 hours: 62,600 → 12 hours: 65,300 → 24 hours: 85,400 → 2 days: 88,600still climbing at last reading | 85,400measured | 25 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /2497812 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC | 626 minutes – 3.6 hours old | 25,700 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 18,300 → 3.0 hours: 25,306 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 37 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
Mere Telegram ke Teeno Channels mein Added Rehna. My Main Verified Channel https://t.me/RANBIRROYOFFICE My Special VSG Telegram https://t.me/iamvsg My Backup Telegram Channel https://t.me/Ranbirroydubai My Public Instagram link https://instagram.com/vsgranbir
Save My Managers Numbers Koi Bhi Issue ya Problem Aaye inko message daal diya karo. https://wa.link/vsgmanager1 https://wa.link/vsgmanager2
Voice message, posted without a caption
Gambling Bandh Kar Rakha hai to Best hai.... Don't Start Again. End Result Loss hi hoga. And If You are Playing.... Trust Only On PCB. Premium Client Book Don't Trust Anyone In Telegram..... Don't Trust On any Offers.... Don't Trust If Anyone Calls You and give any Scheme Or Offers..... Meri Baat Sunoge kabhi Problem nahi Hogi. Premium Watsup Book( PCB) It is The Best Place for You. Click on the Link Below. h…
Will Be Active Soon. Waiting For The Right Time ❤️ Good Night Everyone
Photo, posted without a caption
Premium Watsup Book( PCB) Is The Best Place for You. There is No Bonus or any Attractive Offers Here At PCB. But PCB Have 100% Trust and 100% Loyalty....And All Fair Games. Click on the Link Below. https://wa.link/premiumxvsg https://wa.link/premiumvsg Premium Clients Official Telegram Channels👇🏻 📌 Premium Client Book Channel: https://t.me/Premiumclients
Good Morning Everyone 🌞 Ganesh Aarti🙏🙏
Photo, posted without a caption
🙏 गणपति महाराज हमारे और आपके आने वाले दिनों को खुशियों, सुख-समृद्धि और सफलता से भर दें। हर परेशानी को दूर करें और जीवन में नई उम्मीद, शांति और तरक्की दें। गणपति बप्पा मोरया! ❤️🙏
Happy Ganesh Puja to all My Channel Members. May God Ganesha Bless Us. Hamari Galtiyo ke liye humein Maaf kare.... Humein sahi Raasta dikhaye... Hamari and Hamari Gharwalo ko Achi Sehat de.... Har Har Mahadev Ganpati Bappa Moriya
Showing the 12 most recent of 730 posts we hold for @RANBIRROYOFFICE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@RANBIRROYOFFICE edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 4 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vsgline2 · 124,479#1
@iamvsg · 1,178,295#2
@Ranbirroydubai · 1,200,168#3
@cbtfsports365official · 2,087#4
@AnuragxCricket · 2,010,560#5
@kingamaker91 · 15,011#6
@orignal_khan · 1,287#7
@Rishanktips · 78,193#8
@SuperManSuperTips · 21,972#9
@punterassociation · 1,104#10
@TheIndianPunter · 3,670#11
@besttipsincricket · 34,930#12
@KINGTOSSLINE111 · 34,747#13
@waseemsiddiqui · 6,975#14
@CBTFcricstats · 11,666#15
@jimmypateldubai · 57,700#16
@bettytips · 20,153#17
@linecricketfast · 1,716#18
@jannat0405 · 10,164#19
@BadShahCricNEWS · 4,778#20
@thejannatmannat · 72,726#21
@tipperroastline · 401#22
@BOMBAYMARKETLOADOFFICIAL · 125,953#23
@khatridxb · 65,066#24
@ShriRamBookOriginal · 11,002#25
@TigerLine786 · 9,919#26
@crictossline21 · 100,843#27
@AbirAhmad365 · 5,774#28
@EliteCricketDesk · 14,313#29
@sastidukaan · 3,370#30
@Marketload57 · 8,816#31
@Devendrakothari · 3,329#32
@PayalJaipur · 39,961#33
@Jiofootball · 1,527#34
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vsgline2 · 124,479
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 13 August 2026
@Ranbirroydubai · 1,200,168
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 8 August 2026
@iamvsg · 1,178,295
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 8 August 2026
@FreeCricketTips7 · 45,618
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 13 September 2026
@Sunil_bhatia_offical · 28,240
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
@Ranbir · 21,949
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 22 September 2026
@tigerexchme · 28,958
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 8 September 2026
@SuperManSuperTips · 21,972
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 27 August 2026
@manubhaigandhi05 · 44,792
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 17 September 2026
@SWEETYTIPS1 · 34,752
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 12 September 2026
@Cricket_Ipl_Live_Line_Score · 26,896
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 11 September 2026
@KOHLIPREDICTION · 41,714
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 29 August 2026
@originalhumdard · 45,895
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 27 August 2026
@RCLiveLine · 21,691
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 23 September 2026
@cricket_aryan_betting_guruji · 119,862
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 12 September 2026
@Rockybookscreenshot · 87,598
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
@History_Quiz_PDF_PYQ_MCQ_Notes · 76,675
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 19 August 2026
@FERRARI_BULLET_CRICKET_LIVE_LINE · 23,148
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 19 September 2026
@Funny_Comedy_Videos_cryptoh · 34,997
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 11 September 2026
@predictionking9097 · 27,523
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 8 September 2026
@AnuragxCricket · 2,010,560
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 8 August 2026
@session_kinz · 30,094
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 7 September 2026
@RaghuBhai9450035364 · 37,225
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 27 August 2026
@jmdpredictions · 45,236
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 184 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ranbir Roy (VSG)” (@RANBIRROYOFFICE), 2,352,061 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RANBIRROYOFFICE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.