Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lucky Australia

Channel

Lucky Australia

@luckyvsg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

145,970subscribers

-49,178 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001186947973
TypeChannel
Username@luckyvsg
DescriptionGiving Sports Analysis and Cricket Tips since 2018. 13 years of experience in Safe Gambling. Gamble With Patience is The Key To Win. Ek din me Ambani nahi banna… Par ek din JANNAT apne kadmo me hogi ❤️ @lucky_aus
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/luckyvsg

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

145,970195,148170,5597 August 20267 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -49,178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138,593–202,525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 09:26145,970-390
6 Nov 2026, 06:29146,360-256
5 Nov 2026, 02:56146,616-292
4 Nov 2026, 04:18146,908-627
3 Nov 2026, 05:18147,535-433
2 Nov 2026, 07:59147,968-250
1 Nov 2026, 09:44148,218-367
31 Oct 2026, 12:07148,585-479
30 Oct 2026, 11:09149,064-291
29 Oct 2026, 12:41149,355-419
28 Oct 2026, 10:56149,774-321
27 Oct 2026, 10:41150,095-268
26 Oct 2026, 10:04150,363-280
25 Oct 2026, 11:16150,643-293
24 Oct 2026, 11:50150,936-360
23 Oct 2026, 11:27151,296-454
22 Oct 2026, 10:27151,750-385
21 Oct 2026, 01:10152,135-234
19 Oct 2026, 23:16152,369-260
19 Oct 2026, 01:51152,629first reading

Engagement

580 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 219 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.80%
avg views ÷ 145,970 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,090
262 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
262
of 580 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held580 (30 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total1,070,765
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 01:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
95
Videos
18
Links
80

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 39s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 262 posts held from the last 30 days (2.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC596 viewsread 7 November 2026

Kasam se dimakh fatt rha hai. Ye 2 haar ne Gaand mrraa li.

7 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC702 viewsread 7 November 2026

I know haar toh haar hai… Gaand toh meri bhi phatti hai aapke saath, lekin meri toh FULL ON phatti hai! Ab kya karein, batao? Diwali ka time tha yaar… kam se kam uss waqt toh loss nahi hona chahiye tha! 🥲🪔 @lucky_aus

7 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 7 November 2026

Bhot e Madarchod bndee hai channel me. Back to Back jeet mili koi msg nhi kiya. Abi loss Hua to gaand fatt gyi inki. I know loss to loss hai. Lekin jeet k time per bhi to gaand mraaaoo msg kr k. @lucky_aus

7 Nov 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 8 November 2026

Ye aj ki 2 haar bc dimakh khrab krengi. Bhot jaroort thi jeet ki aj. @lucky_aus

7 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 8 November 2026

15p per bhi single limit plus kro Hobart per. @lucky_aus

7 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC≈4,710 viewsread 8 November 2026

Match 1st entry 64p Heat hai. 2 limit plus kro Hobart per. @lucky_aus

7 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 8 November 2026

Straight loss rha apne ko. Next match me krte hai cover. @lucky_aus

7 Nov 2026, 06:07 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 8 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

7 Nov 2026, 05:51 UTC≈6,150 viewsread 8 November 2026

Match 1st entry 48p Melbourne hai. 3 limit plus kro Adelaide per. @lucky_aus

7 Nov 2026, 04:45 UTC≈3,560 viewsread 8 November 2026

WBBL Match-13 Adelaide vs Melb Match winner: Adelaide or 15p fev. @lucky_aus

Showing the 12 most recent of 580 posts we hold for @luckyvsg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 80 posts on @luckyvsg as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
42

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lucky Australia” (@luckyvsg), 145,970 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luckyvsg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.