Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RC LINE

Channel

RC LINE

@RCLiveLine

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,716subscribers

-670 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001742846530
TypeChannel
Username@RCLiveLine
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RCLiveLine

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,11922,38621,752.57 August 2026 — 22,386 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,386 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,369 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,348 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,320 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,297 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,269 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,244 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,218 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,189 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,159 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,134 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,120 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,109 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,082 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,049 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,019 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,999 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,987 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,977 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,957 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,936 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,916 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,896 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,860 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,849 subscribers6 September 2026 — 21,801 subscribers9 September 2026 — 21,728 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,675 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,693 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,696 subscribers17 September 2026 — 21,691 subscribers28 September 2026 — 21,505 subscribers5 October 2026 — 21,434 subscribers9 October 2026 — 21,344 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,269 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,253 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,237 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,219 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,210 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,199 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,177 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,155 subscribers21 October 2026 — 21,119 subscribers23 October 2026 — 21,674 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,651 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,720 subscribers26 October 2026 — 21,706 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,687 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,762 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,745 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,732 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,758 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,722 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,744 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,717 subscribers4 November 2026 — 21,757 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,734 subscribers6 November 2026 — 21,716 subscribers21,7167 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -670. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,929–22,576 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 18:3821,716-18
5 Nov 2026, 15:5621,734-23
4 Nov 2026, 13:2921,757+40
3 Nov 2026, 12:3121,717-27
2 Nov 2026, 09:0621,744+22
1 Nov 2026, 06:0921,722-36
31 Oct 2026, 07:0421,758+26
30 Oct 2026, 07:2721,732-13
29 Oct 2026, 07:1121,745-17
28 Oct 2026, 03:4021,762+75
27 Oct 2026, 00:1021,687-19
26 Oct 2026, 00:2121,706-14
25 Oct 2026, 03:4621,720+69
24 Oct 2026, 02:1921,651-23
23 Oct 2026, 01:4621,674+555
21 Oct 2026, 23:3421,119-36
20 Oct 2026, 18:5721,155-22
19 Oct 2026, 15:4021,177-22
18 Oct 2026, 13:1821,199-11
17 Oct 2026, 16:1021,210first reading

Engagement

172 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.71%
avg views ÷ 21,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.187%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 172 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held172 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total75,688
Reactions total95
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

303 reactions across 110 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22875.2%
❤‍🔥216.93%
🌚134.29%
😱113.63%
🤣61.98%
😁41.32%
🌭30.99%
🍾30.99%
😢30.99%
🍓20.66%
🤔20.66%
🥱20.66%
🏆10.33%
👍10.33%
🤡10.33%
🤯10.33%
🥰10.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 303 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC529 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

HAPPY DHANTERAS 💖🕯🙏

❤‍🔥7

5 Nov 2026, 03:31 UTC≈1,010 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

WISHING A VERY HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO THE GOAT HIMSELF, KING KOHLI 👑

❤8

4 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 WPL 2027 SCHEDULE 🚨 The 5th edition of the Women's Premier League will begin on January 14 and conclude on February 7, 2027. The complete match-by-match schedule is yet to be officially announced. #WPL2027

4 Nov 2026, 01:25 UTC≈2,330 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💎 TODAY ALL MATCHES LIVE AVAILABLE 💎 🔈All Matches A To Z Bets Available 💰 Best Rates | Instant Play | Fast Withdrawal ➡️Register Now - www.khelking.info ➡️Register Now - www.khelking.info 🌐 VIP Branch Min ( ₹2000) 🟢https://bit.ly/khelkingvipho 🟢https://bit.ly/khelkingvipho 🎮 How to Play Guide 📹 @khelkingvideo

❤6

1 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,990 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Most Matches by a Team in a Calendar Year in T20s ✅ 45 - Indonesia (2025) 42 - India (2022) 42 - Rwanda (2023) 41 - Bahrain (2025) 40 - India (2026)* 36 - Austria (2025)

❤1

1 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,770 viewsread 6 November 2026

Most Matches for New Zealand in T20Is ✅ 143 - Mitchell Santner* 142 - Ish Sodhi 126 - Tim Southee 122 - Martin Guptill 109 - Daryl Mitchell* 105 - James Neesham 102 - Ross Taylor, Glenn Phillips*

1 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,440 viewsread 6 November 2026

TRIVIA :- Mitchell Santner becomes New Zealand's most-capped T20I player, going past Ish Sodhi, who has represented the Black Caps in 142 matches.

1 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC≈3,140 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Most Matches by a Team in a Calendar Year in T20Is ✅ 45 - Indonesia, 2025 42 - Rwanda, 2023 41 - Bahrain, 2025 40 - India, 2022 40 - India, 2026* 36 - Austria, 2025

❤3

1 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 6 November 2026

Milestone Alert :- Varun Chakaravarthy will be playing his 50th T20I game tonight.

1 Nov 2026, 06:47 UTC≈2,020 viewsread 6 November 2026

🇳🇿 NEW ZEALAND 🇳🇿 WON THE TOSS OPTED TO BOWL FIRST ✔️✔️

Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @RCLiveLine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 12 posts on @RCLiveLine as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

BILLA BOMBAY
@billabombay · 61,708
#1
Anurag Dwivedi 🏏
@AnuragxCricket · 1,899,490
#2
Randi chodne wala
@sksthebrand · 322
#3
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐒 𝐓𝐎𝐒𝐒🎩
@TheMarsTossOriginal · 865,647
#4
DEVRAJ CRICKET
@DevrajCricket · 2,161
#5
RD× PREDICTION
@rdx_prediction_1 · 651
#6
CRICBOUNCER TOSS LINE ™
@CRICBOUNCERTOSSLINE · 113,223
#7
Cricket Guru™(Market Load)
@cricketguruanalystload · 7,550
#8
Fitness Journey With Kavita 💪
@FintessWellnessCoach · 1,533
#9
VST™ TENNIS TRICK AND TIPS
@VSTTENNISS · 1,437 (as read 23 September 2026)
#10
POONAWALA FANCY KING
@poonawalaFancy · 973
#11
Imanbumba
@imanbumba700 · 230
#12
KHATRI HARYANA
@khatridxb · 59,431
#13
CRICTOSS LOAD/POSTER HUB
@TOSS_VIDEOIPL · 448
#14
Ranbir Roy (VSG)
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,441,692
#15
MARKET LINE
@linecricketfast · 1,740
#16
CricSpin Fantasy
@Cricspin · 4,962
#17
Rishabh Raj
@RishabhRajOfficial · 4,267 (as read 23 September 2026)
#18
SANAM PREDICTION ™
@SanamPrediction1 · 1,280
#19
RAFTAAR ➖ TOSS
@Raftaardubai_Raftaar · 37,238
#20
Game Changer ™
@GameChangerSpicelist · 794
#21
CRICKET MARKET LOAD
@Marketload57 · 8,795
#22
Sports Wings 🪽
@sportswings · 8,137
#23

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BILLA BOMBAY
@billabombay · 61,708
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RC LINE” (@RCLiveLine), 21,716 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RCLiveLine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.