𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗖𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗕𝗬 𝗦𝗠𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗜 𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗛𝗔! 👑🇮🇳 Smriti Mandhana becomes the 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗦𝗧 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗬𝗘𝗥 in women’s cricket history to complete 𝟭𝟭,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗨𝗡𝗦! 🔥 A monumental achievement from one of India’s greatest! 🙌 #AsianGames #SmritiMandhana

Channel
CricInformer
@cricinformer
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
269,405subscribers
-13,148 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001151878420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cricinformer |
| Description | Best Place for Cricket Info and Stats. This channel strictly adheres to the PROGA 2025 guidelines. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2018 and 31 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cricinformer |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 269,405 | -748 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 270,153 | -552 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 270,705 | -493 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 271,198 | -796 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 271,994 | -1,348 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 273,342 | -1,103 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 274,445 | -497 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 274,942 | -340 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:34 | 275,282 | -254 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:06 | 275,536 | -270 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 275,806 | -442 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 276,248 | -169 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 276,417 | -230 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 276,647 | -214 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 276,861 | -200 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 277,061 | -348 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 277,409 | -201 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 277,610 | -444 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 278,054 | -304 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 278,358 | first reading |
Engagement
776 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.78%
- avg views ÷ 269,405 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,800
- 606 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 606
- of 776 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 776 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,909,525 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 06:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,720
- Videos
- ≈2
- Links
- ≈157
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗛𝗔 𝗚𝗛𝗢𝗦𝗛 𝗨𝗡𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗛𝗘𝗗! 💥🇮🇳 A blistering 𝟰𝟵 𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝟮𝟮 balls against Sri Lanka in the Asian Games gold medal match! Few in world cricket can match her incredible hitting power! 🔥👏 Image Credit: Sony LIV #Asiangames #IndwvsSlW
Rain reduces India vs Japan to just 5 overs per side! Shreyas Iyer wins the toss and elected to bat first. 🇮🇳 𝗡𝗢 𝗕𝗨𝗠𝗥𝗔𝗛, 𝗡𝗢 𝗩𝗔𝗜𝗕𝗛𝗔𝗩 in India’s XI! Image Credit: FanCode #IndvsJapan
𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗜𝗔 𝗣𝗜𝗟𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝟮𝟭𝟲! 🔥🇮🇳 Blistering knocks from Mandhana, Shafali and Richa power India to a MASSIVE total against Sri Lanka in the Asian Games final! 💥 What a batting display on the big stage! 👏 Image Credit: Sony LIV #IndwvsSlw #AsianGames
Richa Ghosh🔥🔥
200 runs🔥🔥
𝗦𝗠𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗜 𝗗𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗦! 🔥🇮🇳 A brilliant 𝟳𝟵 𝗼𝗳𝗳 𝟰𝟱 in the Asian Games gold medal match! A century eluded Mandhana, but she gave India the flying start they needed when it mattered most! 👏 Image Credit: Sony LIV #AsianGames #SmritiMandhana
𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗜𝗔’𝗦 𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗖𝗞𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗘𝗡! 👑🇮🇳 Shafali Verma steps up AGAIN! From the ODI World Cup final to the Asian Games final, she keeps delivering when India needs her most! 🔥👏 𝗕𝗜𝗚 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗚𝗘, 𝗙𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗦 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗙𝗔𝗟𝗜! 💥 #IndwvsSLw
Mandhana missed well deserved century 😔😔
𝗙𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗦 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗘? 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗘! 🔥🇮🇳 First the Asia Cup, then the Asian Games! Shafali Verma delivers TWO gems in consecutive finals of multinational tournaments! 👏 Image Credit: Sony Liv #ShafaliVerma #AsiaGames
𝗧𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗔 𝗕𝗢𝗪, 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗙𝗔𝗟𝗜! 🔥🇮🇳 Shafali Verma falls for 𝗮 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝟰𝟴 against Sri Lanka in the final! Just TWO runs short of a well-deserved fifty. What a knock! 👏💔 Image Credit: Sony LIV #ShafaliVerma #IndwvsSLw
India’s vice-captain 𝗦𝗺𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗮 lights up the game with a brilliant half-century! Pure class and elegance! 👏✨ Image Credit: Sony LIV #IndwvsSlw
Showing the 12 most recent of 776 posts we hold for @cricinformer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@AnuragxCricket · 2,010,560#1
@awarnessTM · 2,546#2
@fantasyteammakerskills · 6,745#3
@deathovers33 · 9,839#4
@Team_Six_T6 · 4,969#5
@CRICDJ · 20,350#6
@premiumteamsleak · 7,326#7
@arjunkumar214 · 2,979#8
@hawkersprimeleakfree · 4,806#9
@Gods11forecast · 14,734#10
@AakashChopraOfficial · 182,019#11
@profantasytips · 3,594#12
@SomeshThakreTg · 399,818#13
@foxy4ex · 2,957#14
@Mousabos112 · 5,963#15
@sud11winners · 2,735#16
@FMaster12 · 2,304#17
@bullsandbeartrade · 1,882#18
@AllPremiumLeak · 2,854#19
@DhoniFantasySportsPrime · 3,530#20
@Fixingmatchinformation · 976#21
@Harshit_x_cricket · 2,219#22
@sfgfamily · 77,612#23
@Aspirants24x7 · 1,770#24
@FBuzz11 · 87,351#25
@Cricketexpertamit · 12,028#26
@passionateleakersofficials · 5,532#27
@PRIMELEAKERBABA · 16,036#28
@pkypower · 2,614#29
@Youth_teams · 1,831#30
@fantasysportscentral · 1,314#31
@sanketshah2105 · 1,226 (as read 10 August 2026)#32
@bestpick · 88,843#33
@realpredictr · 1,826#34
@fantasycricpro · 7,264#35
@Onmaastaywithme · 4,593#36
@DomesticBhau · 1,738#37
@aman123456778 · 4,495#38
@domesticlogic · 2,826#39
@dhonifantasysports · 7,068#40
@premiumleaker · 4,934#41
@tradewlogic · 3,228#42
@ShivamSporting · 6,333#43
@stoningstar29 · 6,885#44
@Mousa11Official · 4,888#45
@souravsamajik84 · 34,084#46
@harryexpert183 · 1,168#47
@EliteFantasy1 · 2,220#48
@Prime_Leak_PrimeLeakbaba · 12,183#49
@TuPhirJitayega · 5,640#50
@fantasypky · 3,493#51
@LAGAAN11_PRO · 3,026#52
@Akshat250team · 6,442#53
@sumitujjain11 · 2,166#54
@GanpatiBappaXI · 637#55
@BINDASHRKG91 · 25,758#56
@ALLPRIMELEAKERKING · 4,176#57
@Mahakal_Family_Mini_GL_King_Join · 49,972 (as read 10 August 2026)#58
@Team_Six_T6_Football · 6,092#59
@Rahulfantasyteams · 14,720#60
@fantasygram7 · 52,705#61
@PGInvinciblesreal · 1,540 (as read 10 August 2026)#62
@kohlivibeeee · 45#63
@Himanshu43FD · 10,091#64
@dada989743 · 2,246#65
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@winningxzonex · 22,825
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 19 September 2026
@FantasyXpressOfficial · 27,836
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 September 2026
@FBuzz11 · 87,351
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
@F_W_Official · 24,154
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 16 September 2026
@Cricinformer_Informer · 33,437
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 4 September 2026
@Cricinforrmerx · 45,458
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 27 August 2026
@Dream11Teamsfree8 · 47,925
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026
@d11teams · 55,175
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 23 August 2026
@FantasySyndicate · 56,420
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
@FTH877 · 56,989
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
@TeamMSCricket · 118,052
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 20 August 2026
@AnuragCricketsTeam · 87,523
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 20 August 2026
@crickotologic · 79,194
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 20 August 2026
@Iplteams18s · 170,701
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 August 2026
@DevanshuGuptaTG · 65,733
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 August 2026
@sfgfamily · 77,612
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@AakashChopraOfficial · 182,019
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
@SomeshThakreTg · 399,818
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
@AnuragxCricket · 2,010,560
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 8 August 2026
@crictracker · 32,594
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 11 September 2026
@fantasypoint5 · 31,975
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 5 September 2026
@fscayan · 64,187
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
@cricketkabosshu · 91,072
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 August 2026
@TodayPerfect_11 · 22,529
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CricInformer” (@cricinformer), 269,405 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cricinformer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.