Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Paranormies Present

Channel

The Paranormies Present

@TheParanormiesPresent

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,117subscribers

-333 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001452921969
TypeChannel
Username@TheParanormiesPresent
DescriptionYour favorite show. Esoterica, Occult, Conspiracies, and so much more. Our brand new website!: https://paranormies.com/ RSS Feed: https://media.rss.com/the-paranormies/feed.xml Livestreams: https://share-link.pilled.net/channel/163640
Created25 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheParanormiesPresent

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

27,11727,45027,283.56 August 2026 — 27,450 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,437 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,429 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,416 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,408 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,393 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,383 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,375 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,366 subscribers15 August 2026 — 27,352 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,337 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,333 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,335 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,336 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,327 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,330 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,328 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,315 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,310 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,314 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,307 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,300 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,285 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,280 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,265 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,258 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,250 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,236 subscribers9 September 2026 — 27,192 subscribers12 September 2026 — 27,183 subscribers13 September 2026 — 27,160 subscribers15 September 2026 — 27,135 subscribers17 September 2026 — 27,117 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -333. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,067–27,500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:4127,117-18
15 Sept 2026, 11:2027,135-25
13 Sept 2026, 18:4127,160-23
12 Sept 2026, 00:5727,183-9
9 Sept 2026, 17:4027,192-44
4 Sept 2026, 05:1827,236-14
2 Sept 2026, 20:3527,250-8
1 Sept 2026, 16:4627,258-7
31 Aug 2026, 19:2927,265-15
30 Aug 2026, 16:1627,280-5
29 Aug 2026, 15:0327,285-15
28 Aug 2026, 11:4327,300-7
27 Aug 2026, 13:3827,307-7
26 Aug 2026, 14:1227,314+4
25 Aug 2026, 15:1927,310-5
24 Aug 2026, 14:1627,315-13
22 Aug 2026, 20:3427,328-2
21 Aug 2026, 13:1527,330+3
20 Aug 2026, 14:5127,327-9
19 Aug 2026, 14:4627,336first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 27,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,110
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held66 (12 July 202616 September 2026)
Views total82,130
Reactions total1,332
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 18:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13,400
Videos
5,670
Links
6,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 36m
Average length
12m 45s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,793 reactions across 62 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣66017.4%
💯44911.8%
😁40910.8%
🔥2466.49%
2245.91%
🤔1864.90%
🤡1704.48%
1493.93%
😈1483.90%
👍1313.45%
🤮1163.06%
🤬912.40%
🙏852.24%
🫡701.85%
❤‍🔥631.66%
🤯591.56%
👀491.29%
🗿481.27%
👾451.19%
😎421.11%
35 further kinds3539.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,844 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 01:00 UTC≈1,870 views78 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣49😁19🔥9🤯1

Signed Hollis

15 Sept 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,960 views35 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Forwarded from @VinsFavouriteArtworkPhoto

Arrival of the Plague by Frederick Simpson Coburn

🥰12😈74🔥3💊2🤩2🦄2👏1

Signed Hollis

15 Sept 2026, 19:04 UTC≈1,830 views37 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Forwarded from @schizosteadingPhoto

Wow, "wood welding" is actually super simple. Ever seen those mythical staircases etc that have no joints or fasteners and the lore is about a wizard who showed up and just put it together? I think they just didn't want us to know high- frequency resonance was a tech in the old world. When you hit 2 pieces of wood pressed together at 20-40k Hz it "melts" the lignins, and when removed the pieces are fused together

🤔1611🔥4🆒4👍1😎1

Signed Hollis

15 Sept 2026, 05:25 UTC≈2,510 views53 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video

Chinese autonomous robotic fish for underwater surveillance.

🤮27🤔9🥰4🥴3🤓2😁2😱21

Signed Occupied American

15 Sept 2026, 02:19 UTC≈1,740 views58 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Forwarded from @AltSkull48Photo

This is how you know you don’t have to worry about AI actually taking over the world and killing everyone. It’s also them setting the stage for a future op in which a “rogue AI” shuts down a few cities or something for a couple of weeks so they can come in and regulate the living fuck out of it like they have done with so many other things in the past such as 9/11 => endless wars in the ME and the Patriot Act along

💯41👍7🤡54🔥1

Signed Skull

14 Sept 2026, 13:45 UTC≈4,970 views25 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video

Alchemical Tech Revolution (past Paranormies guest Wayne McRoy) | The 9/11 Luciferic Code... Double Feature 25 YEARS LATER The occult is ever present in major world events, and there is no greater example of this than the September 11th ritual that was foisted upon the world 25 years ago. Reading from, "The Most Dangerous Book In The World: 9/11 As Mass Ritual", by S.K. Bain... www.alchemicaltechrevolution.com Way

🔥20💯2😎2🤯1

Signed Skull

13 Sept 2026, 17:51 UTC≈1,840 views52 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Forwarded from @AltSkull48Video

Sunscreens contain hormone disrupting chemicals Ya think?? Look, it’s yet another thing conspiracybros have been talking about for years. I mean, “HOMOsalate?” Come on, it’s right there in the name! @AltSkull48 @TheParanormiesPresent

💯34🤝7💊6🤣2🥰2🗿1

Signed Skull

13 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC≈2,390 views34 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Forwarded from @AnonymousConservative

Someone uploaded what is claimed to be a dossier on Zuckerberg by someone who was there at the start of Facebook, and according to them, Zuckerberg was picked up as a child by some Intel operation and MK Ultra’d, and then he was assigned to act as if he created Facebook. Tough to judge the veracity of the account, but not at all impossible.

👍15💯10🤔5👀2🤣1🤯1

Signed Skull

12 Sept 2026, 18:37 UTC≈2,650 views14 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Forwarded from @yuriwarnedusPoll

What do you think happened on 9/11?

  1. There were no planes, that was CGI added to videos after the fact, just controlled demolitions47%
  2. There were planes that hit it but they were ultimately brought down by controlled demolitions47%
  3. The buildings were hit by planes and damage from the planes is what caused them to collapse6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🗿14

Signed Skull

6 Sept 2026, 22:44 UTC≈4,740 views55 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Moo

😈269👀7👾3🤔3🤡3😢3👍1

Signed Occupied American

4 Sept 2026, 04:17 UTC≈5,200 views95 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯65🤣18😍8🦄3😭1

Signed Hollis

2 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC≈6,730 views160 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video

So it begins

🤣106👾18🤡14🤯533🖕3😁3

Signed Occupied American

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @TheParanormiesPresent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Sept 2026, 18:37 UTCAnonymous Poll1,180 voters approx.

What do you think happened on 9/11?

  1. There were no planes, that was CGI added to videos after the fact, just controlled demolitions47%
  2. There were planes that hit it but they were ultimately brought down by controlled demolitions47%
  3. The buildings were hit by planes and damage from the planes is what caused them to collapse6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTCAnonymous Poll987 voters

Are there immortals on earth behind the scenes?

  1. No, impossible.8%
  2. Maybe, anything's possible.37%
  3. Yes, and they're trying to trap us here.12%
  4. Yes, they're Nephilim and must be destroyed.15%
  5. Yes, he's called God.20%
  6. We are immortal, there's no consequences here, we're just passing through.13%
  7. Yes, like Thoth or Buddha, they graduated and stayed to help us do the same.7%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 16 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Alt Skull VM Archive
@AltSkullVMArchive · 802
7 posts
The Globe Is DEAD!!!!🐻
@Killshot2020 · 3,898
4 posts
TheKirbyQ
@TheKirbyQ · 159
4 posts
Alt Skull's Charnel House
@AltSkull48 · 30,072
3 posts
Bill Cooper Archive
@BillCooperArchive · 2,501
2 posts
Petrafied News
@PetrafiedNews · 596
2 posts
🍚尺工匚乇乃口山乚 丂口匚工乇丅丫🍚☦️
@RiceBowlSociety · 4,572
2 posts
Joey Two Names
@joeytwonames · 58
2 posts
Beyond Clown 🌎
@BeyondClownWorld · 890
1 post
𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊 🆆🅸🅽🆃🅴🆁 𝐒𝐓𝐔𝐃𝐈𝐎𝐒
@Black_Winter_Studios · 67
1 post
Fantastische Geschichte
@FantastischeGeschichte · 332
1 post
Flat Earth Sun and Moon clock
@FlatEarthSunMoonClock · 185
1 post
Hazor’s Mad Lab
@HazorsMadLab · 71
1 post
The Outcast Researcher
@PunisherNewsRoom · 275
1 post
Typhus's Tavistock Testing Center
@RealTyphus · 2,591
1 post
ᯓ ✈︎ ▌▌9-11 Videos, Memes + Proofs
@September11Proofs · 426
1 post
St Michael's Operations🏴‍☠️🇻🇦
@St_michaels_operations · 610
1 post
The UnBEARable Gravy Train🐻
@TheUnbearableGravyTrain · 399
1 post
🌎Wetteradler🌤 International
@WetteradlerInternational · 1,693
1 post
Alternative Timeline
@alternativetimeline · 72
1 post
Astrokitt3n
@astrokitt · 1
1 post
Chupacabra Kennel
@chupacabra_kennel · 5,849
1 post
Dharma Initiative: The Quest for Knowledge
@dharma_initiative108 · 192
1 post
Conspiretards United
@extra_normal · 120
1 post
Infoetainment
@infoetainmentcck · 16
1 post
🧟‍♂Spooky Steamed Memeballs: goblin mode 😈
@memes_mf · 16,199
1 post
Modern Free Media
@modernfreemedia · 203
1 post
Arkham Farms
@schizosteading · 6,280
1 post
𝕤𝕡𝕒𝕔𝕖 𝕚𝕤 𝕗𝕒𝕜𝕖 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕘𝕒𝕪
@spaceisfakeandgay · 67
1 post
The Daze of No Way
@thedazeofnoway · 97
1 post
Wahrheitsministerium 2020
@wahrheitsministerium2020 · 7
1 post
Telegram Yellow Pages
@yellowpages42 · 329
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Just a Dude 😎
@JustDudeChannel · 63,423
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
Conspiracy Theory
@conspiracy_theory3 · 47,735
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
HISTORY
@secret_history2 · 69,407
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
Disclosure HUB
@disclosurehub · 74,772
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
News | Without Lies🇺🇸
@usa_news_trump · 47,624
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS
@stfn_news · 63,099
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
CultivateElevate
@ElevateThyMind · 76,582
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 August 2026
S E E | Secret History
@Secret_history1 · 71,694
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
𝕱𝖑𝖆𝖙 𝕰𝖆𝖗𝖙𝖍 𝕾𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖊𝖙𝖞
@flatearth · 44,832
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
Before Our Time
@BeforeOurTime · 91,990
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
Farmer Lucy 👩‍🌾
@Farmer_Lucy · 50,955
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 25 August 2026
Natural Healing 🥦
@Natural_Healing_USA · 71,696
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Gardening Tips 🏠🌿
@Gardening_Tips_Farming · 49,173
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Health Tips🍀
@Health_Tips_USA · 52,443
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Paranormies Present” (@TheParanormiesPresent), 27,117 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheParanormiesPresent.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.