Channel
@yuriwarnedus
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
5,778subscribers
+89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001179463210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuriwarnedus |
| Created | 6 April 2019 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuriwarnedus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 5,778 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 5,774 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 5,766 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 5,761 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 5,753 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 5,758 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 5,753 | +43 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 5,710 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 5,717 | +26 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 5,691 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 5,689 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 5,689 | first reading |
80 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 80 (5 August 2026 β 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,466 |
| Reactions total | 415 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
819 reactions across 80 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 266 | 32.5% | |
| π― | 163 | 19.9% | |
| π | 68 | 8.30% | |
| π€£ | 61 | 7.45% | |
| π | 43 | 5.25% | |
| π«‘ | 41 | 5.01% | |
| β€ | 33 | 4.03% | |
| π₯ | 30 | 3.66% | |
| β‘ | 27 | 3.30% | |
| π | 21 | 2.56% | |
| π¨ | 17 | 2.08% | |
| π€ | 11 | 1.34% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 10 | 1.22% | |
| β | 6 | 0.733% | |
| π€‘ | 5 | 0.611% | |
| π | 3 | 0.366% | |
| π | 3 | 0.366% | |
| π³ | 2 | 0.244% | |
| π» | 2 | 0.244% | |
| π | 2 | 0.244% | |
| 5 further kinds | 5 | 0.611% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 819 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
When trad Catholics or Orthodox become a high enough percent of the US population (we're only talking a few percent needed here) it's only a matter of time before we see something of this magnitude go up, showing that white Christian ingenuity and aesthetic is back on the table after decades of soycularist ugliness.
π―2π1π»1
Considering in gay secular western countries the only religious statues going up for the most part these days are Indian poop demon god statues, I'm gonna call this a win
π1π1
World highest statue of Virgin mary has just been unveiled in Poland Poland...Christ of Nations... https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/540596031
β€4β€βπ₯1π1
When I say Israel is a terrorist state, that's not me saying Iran ISN'T a terrorist state. The only difference is we're not paying for Iran to do what they do with our taxes. "But Iran has killed Americans" Yes and so have Israel. Israel killed dozens of Americans in the USS liberty attack, in other words Israel killed more Americans in one day than Iran has after months of a war that we provoked. Oh and also about β¦
β‘3π2
"...for minors" Does that mean adults can keep doing it with Medicaid? That's the question all of us should be asking here
π2π―2
You should be able to sue the government for false imprisonment for a boatload of compensation if the law they arrested you for is later ruled unconstitutional by the courts
π3π€3
You know they deep down know they backed the wrong horse, but good luck ever getting one to actually admit that. At best they'll try to gaslight you into thinking they never did in the first place.
π―9π3π2π³1
Look at how hard shitlibs are coping in the comments section of this video that shows Fauci knew it wasn't quite as "safe and effective" as it was made out to be. Forget anything about the COVID jabs with this, this is a window into the mind of a shitlib and shows how they think and their thought process. They will cope to the ends of the earth and never admit they were wrong about anything, and they won't even takeβ¦
π―6π2π³1
Photo, posted without a caption
π€‘5π5π2
Foids will post shit like this and then be genuinely surprised that all of the repeal the 19th amendment talk is going on out there these days
π―25π5
It's a real shame that "Disney adults" are an actual thing that exists, isn't it
π12π4π―1
Oh man, only three percent of Indians have traveled abroad. Three percent and look at all of the problems it's caused. I don't want to imagine a world where that's higher
π¨17π6π―3
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @yuriwarnedus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββ¦οΈ Yuri Bezmenov Warned Us πΊπΈβ (@yuriwarnedus), 5,778 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuriwarnedus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.