happy failed mensive bamies..
😢13❤3

Channel
@TheStahlbaum
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,014subscribers
-2,935 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002177329152 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheStahlbaum |
| Description | ㅤㅤ ( ㅤ𝒊𝒊.ㅤ Frostbound-Reverie.ㅤ) ㅤㅤㅤㅤ๋࣭ ⭑ @Stahlbaums ㅤㅤㅤㅤ๋࣭ ⭑ @StahlbaumRobot ㅤㅤㅤㅤ๋࣭ ⭑ @StahlbaumSfsBot (HOLD) ē. 𝓣he hush within the gilded realms: ৎㅤ.. A presence of soft, 𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓁𝒾𝓉 grace. 🪽 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheStahlbaum |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:05 | 10,014 | -33 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:01 | 10,047 | -19 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 10,066 | -28 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:24 | 10,094 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:30 | 10,106 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:39 | 10,112 | -21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 10,133 | -28 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 10,161 | -42 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 10,203 | -25 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 10,228 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 10,231 | -27 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 10,258 | -40 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:30 | 10,298 | -17 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:11 | 10,315 | -47 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 10,362 | -22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 10,384 | -27 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:39 | 10,411 | -38 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 10,449 | -43 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 10,492 | -39 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:45 | 10,531 | first reading |
352 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 352 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
363 reactions across 37 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 86 | 23.7% | |
| ❤ | 66 | 18.2% | |
| 😢 | 41 | 11.3% | |
| 🕊 | 29 | 7.99% | |
| 🍓 | 23 | 6.34% | |
| 💘 | 23 | 6.34% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 3.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 3.31% | |
| 🍾 | 12 | 3.31% | |
| 💋 | 10 | 2.75% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 1.93% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 1.93% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 1.93% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 1.65% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 😘 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.826% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.551% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.275% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 352 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 352 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheStahlbaum. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 352 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 3 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
happy failed mensive bamies..
😢13❤3
terima kasih 2 tahunnya ya bamies..
🕊8❤4
Channel name was changed to «(DISBAND) House of Stahlbaum: A Winter Court Shaped by the Nutcracker Waltz.»
Dear our Bamies, After a long journey filled with countless memories, challenges, laughter, and unforgettable moments, we have come to a difficult decision. With heavy hearts, we would like to announce that Stahlbaum has OFFICIALLY DISBANDED. We are deeply grateful to everyone who has been part of Stahlbaum’s journey. To those who supported us, believed in us, stood beside us, and shared even the smallest moments wi…
😭81😢28❤9🕊8🍓5🤯2
Sticker, posted without a caption
hi, bamies! perhaps this “beauty face” can give you a little energy to survive this monday 🩷😋
❤9❤🔥5🍓5🔥5🍾4🐳3💘3🎉2
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅠᅠ ⠀⠀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⠀ ⠀⡞⠉⠋⢧⣤⣤⠟⠁⠉⡷ ⠀⠳⠤⣤⣄⣽⠯⢥⣤⠴⠃ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⡏⠀⠀⠀⢣ ⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⢠⡋ ⠀⠀⡀⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠃⢄⠀⠀ ᅠᅠᅠ sugarwheep searching ᅠᅠㅤᅠ for new wonhee ♡໒꒱ ๑˚。🎀 a place where the sugary joy of a confectionary shop meets the cool, sweet embrace of an ice cream flavour ♡ all wrapped up in the soft, cozy comfort of a teddy bear hug 🐻♡ 🎵🍒ྀི we are looking for lee wonhee potrayers to bonding and play with us ☻² ㅤㅤᅠᅠ ၄၃︵᳝⏜᳝᳝۟ ၄၃︵᳝⏜᳝᳝۟ ၄၃ hi s…
Sticker, posted without a caption
#IDIDItFirst
ᅟ ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟSAY IT WITH THE BLOOM: ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ #IDIDItFirst! 🌸 ᅟ ᅟ 𝘞𝘌 𝘋𝘐𝘋 𝘐𝘛 𝘍𝘐𝘙𝘚𝘛! ᅟᅟ 𝘈𝘕𝘋 𝘞𝘌’𝘓𝘓 𝘉𝘓𝘖𝘖𝘔 𝘈𝘎𝘈𝘐𝘕. ❀༉‧₊˚. (NASCENCE OF IDID: SEPTEMBER 15th.) A seedling has spent a whole year reaching for the light, and look at it now: every petal is wide open! ᅟ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 352 posts we hold for @TheStahlbaum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 10 posts on @TheStahlbaum as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 80 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TheStahlbaum named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(DISBAND) House of Stahlbaum: A Winter Court Shaped by the Nutcracker Waltz.” (@TheStahlbaum), 10,014 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheStahlbaum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.