Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TON CABAL🦞

Channel

TON CABAL🦞

@Ton_cabal

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,610subscribers

-584 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001971627199
TypeChannel
Usernames@Ton_cabal @toncabal
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ton_cabal

Growth

13,61014,19513,902.55 August 2026 — 14,194 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,194 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,194 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,195 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,187 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,172 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,163 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,163 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,158 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,156 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,147 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,147 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,128 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,121 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,101 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,097 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,064 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,064 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,035 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,035 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,009 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,009 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,994 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,994 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,981 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,975 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,963 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,958 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,948 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,948 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,921 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,914 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,903 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,900 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,889 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,884 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,876 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,876 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,873 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,866 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,858 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,858 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,842 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,842 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,827 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,827 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,816 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,812 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,797 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,797 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,786 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,777 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,763 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,753 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,742 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,610 subscribers5 August 20269 September 2026
58 measurements spanning 34 days, net -584. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,522–14,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 03:1713,610-132
6 Sept 2026, 23:2013,742-11
5 Sept 2026, 19:4113,753-10
4 Sept 2026, 09:3513,763-14
3 Sept 2026, 15:3913,777-9
3 Sept 2026, 01:0713,786-11
2 Sept 2026, 05:2213,797no change
2 Sept 2026, 00:1513,797-15
1 Sept 2026, 06:2613,812-4
1 Sept 2026, 02:4613,816-11
31 Aug 2026, 02:5413,827no change
31 Aug 2026, 00:5813,827-15
30 Aug 2026, 04:1313,842no change
30 Aug 2026, 03:1413,842-16
29 Aug 2026, 02:3513,858no change
29 Aug 2026, 00:0413,858-8
28 Aug 2026, 03:5713,866-7
27 Aug 2026, 22:1313,873-3
27 Aug 2026, 02:2913,876no change
27 Aug 2026, 00:0413,876first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 13,610 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.276%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 May 202620 August 2026)
Views total1,450
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

346 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥15243.9%
custom 52445554452673675199226.6%
custom 54542863304879225718825.4%
👀144.05%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ton_cabal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 May 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,450 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

GOLD FEST Season 2 is LIVE with a $1,000,000 prize pool!! Not a random prize pool, backed by @gamee & @ngrndrewards with over 120M users on Telegram. The amazing part is that you don’t farm the usual tokens by playing. You get $GOLD, which is backed by real gold via nGRND. Keep digging, keep collecting daily. I’ll keep you updated on my progress in the game. XX - @goldfest_bot

custom 54542863304879225714

Signed Gio

28 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈4,330 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026

UTYA to Billions, GROYP to +$100M! Telegram's $GRAM eco will skyrocket!! w/ @yugoslavac @larrryyy @frag @plug 📱 Watch on X here ✈️ Watch on Telegram here 📱 Watch on Twitch here

❤‍🔥13custom 54542863304879225719

Signed Gio

28 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈5,760 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Why is $GROYP undervalued below $100m? Why is $GRAM the best ecosystem to position yourself early? This is not a STREAM you should miss. Today at 6 PM UTC. w/ @yugoslavac @larrryyy @frag @plug PULL UP! https://x.com/Giooton/status/2082090591085593024?s=20

custom 524455544526736751913custom 54542863304879225716❤‍🔥5

Signed Gio

22 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC≈5,520 views27 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

How to make millions $$ from Gram (EASY) w/ @plug @frag @obey 📱 Watch on X here ✈️ Watch on Telegram here 📱 Watch on Twitch here

custom 524455544526736751915❤‍🔥6custom 54542863304879225716

Signed Gio

22 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC≈4,550 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Stream today with @plug, @frag and @obey! Let the biggest whales explain why you need to position yourself early in $GRAM. They don’t just talk about it, they’ve already done it themselves. As a team, their total holdings across TON assets are worth over $10 million. See you all at 8 PM UTC! Watch below: X: @giooton Telegram: @toncabal Twitch: giooton

❤‍🔥17custom 52445554452673675196custom 54542863304879225713

Signed Gio

17 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,700 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

i did tell you to position yourself early on 67! they brought a new lvl to mini apps, now you know what you get in advance for your efforts. keep gramming, keep grinding :)

❤‍🔥14

Signed Gio

24 Jun 2026, 12:01 UTC≈3,360 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

New Prediction market released in Telegram by Getgems and Polymarket! @ipredict

❤‍🔥15👀4custom 52445554452673675193

Signed Gio

22 Jun 2026, 18:57 UTC≈1,930 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Wallet 2 Season is LIVE with $750,000 Reward! Join Ton Wall Squad below!!! Click 👉 TON WALL Squad

❤‍🔥6custom 52445554452673675191

Signed Gio

17 Jun 2026, 18:09 UTC≈3,740 views15 reactions5 Starsread 2 September 2026

LIVE w/ Daria, CEO of @Mira💭 AI Agents x Telegram x Mira💭 📱 Watch on X here ✈️ Watch on Telegram here 📱 Watch on Twitch here

❤‍🔥9custom 54542863304879225715custom 52445554452673675191

Signed Gio

17 Jun 2026, 12:44 UTC≈3,530 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Going live today with Daria, CEO of Mira. We’ll talk AI agents, why Telegram is becoming a natural home for them and how @Mira turns messaging into an AI-powered execution layer. Plus, we’re giving away 3 Mira Pro. PULL UP. 6PM UTC Live on X @giooton Live on Telegram @toncabal

custom 545428633048792257112❤‍🔥6custom 52445554452673675193👀2

Signed Gio

2 Jun 2026, 20:53 UTC≈2,160 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @giootradesPhoto

Making mini apps great again as it says. Let’s see if it will play off. We’re at top already Six Seven Club

custom 52445554452673675198❤‍🔥3

2 Jun 2026, 20:34 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 2 September 2026

Something new is coming prob on TON, better to get in early. 👇👇 Six Seven Club

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ton_cabal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TON CABAL🦞” (@Ton_cabal), 13,610 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ton_cabal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.