Trade it simple by Mariel Lang pinned «Traders, ayer les dije que les tenía una noticia Bueno… esto era 👀 Hace un tiempo, tomando un café son Sergi, un trader que lleva más de 25 años trabajando con sistemas me dijo algo que me quedó grabado. No conoce a ningún trader que haya durado en el mercado…»

Channel
Trade it simple by Mariel Lang
@Tradeitsimple
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,981subscribers
-95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001386296888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tradeitsimple |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tradeitsimple |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 9,981 | -16 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:44 | 9,997 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:46 | 10,000 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 10,001 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 10,006 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 10,010 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 10,015 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 10,023 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 10,025 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 10,017 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 10,025 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 10,028 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 10,030 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 10,032 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 10,039 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 10,047 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 10,049 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 10,043 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 10,040 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 10,044 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.8%
- avg views ÷ 9,981 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,170
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.81%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (21 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,736 |
| Reactions total | 565 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,310 reactions across 30 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 428 | 32.7% | |
| 🔥 | 354 | 27.0% | |
| 👍 | 158 | 12.1% | |
| 👏 | 108 | 8.24% | |
| 🎉 | 42 | 3.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 41 | 3.13% | |
| 🥰 | 35 | 2.67% | |
| ⚡ | 31 | 2.37% | |
| 👌 | 20 | 1.53% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 1.53% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 1.15% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 1.07% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 0.992% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 0.84% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 0.458% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 0.458% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.382% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.076% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Traders, ayer les dije que les tenía una noticia Bueno… esto era 👀 Hace un tiempo, tomando un café son Sergi, un trader que lleva más de 25 años trabajando con sistemas me dijo algo que me quedó grabado. No conoce a ningún trader que haya durado en el mercado, siendo enteramente discrecional Y esa conversación no se quedó solo como una frase, yo llevaba más de ocho meses trabada con unas estrategias. Sergi me ayu…
👍3🔥1🥰1🙏1
Traders, tenemos noticias. Mañana anunciamos algo que veníamos preparando desde hace un tiempo. No te lo pierdas, activa las notificaciones👀
🔥15👏9🙏2❤🔥1
https://www.youtube.com/live/KaJwhmoQ-3w?si=UHzOkWcVlEyCwazc Estamos en vivo🚀🚀
❤8🔥2
¡Atención! Estamos próximos a vernos 🚀🐢 En menos de media hora nos encontramos TODOS!!!! Entra al link y guarda la clase para notificarte cuando sea la hora 🚀 https://youtube.com/live/KaJwhmoQ-3w?feature=share
❤5🔥2
Ya tienen ELON 🚀 Ahora quiero enseñarles algo mucho más interesante: cómo se llega a construir algo así. Mañana voy a abrirles la puerta de mi cueva durante 60 minutos. Pizarra, pantalla compartida, procesos, herramientas, backtests y números reales. Sin masterclass bonita. Trabajo real, en vivo. CUEVA SESSIONS - Mercado Abierto La sesión que no debería existir. Mañana, 25 de agosto 5:00pm Hra. Ven. 4:00pm Hra.…
❤15🔥4⚡2❤🔥1
Pendientes, que más tarde les tengo otra sorpresa👀🤌🏼
🔥3❤1😁1
Tengo una deuda pendiente con ustedes. Llegamos a las 200 reacciones que les pedí para liberar ELON… y entre una cosa y otra nunca se las mandé😅 Así que, lo prometido es deuda. ELON es una estrategia para SpaceX completamente sistemática. En el backtest de estos dos meses: - 23.8% - 3.3% de caída máxima - Profit Factor de 2.3 Y se las voy a dejar completa: reglas exactas, video paso a paso y código abierto. Puede…
🥰17👏15❤11👍4🎉3⚡1🔥1
Ya vamos por la mitad! Esa es mi gente. Que mejor cosa que hacer un viernes por la noche?
❤51🎉12👍9🔥5😱3
ALERTA: Hice una estrategia de trading ridículamente simple, rentable y VERIFICABLE para la acción de SpaceX. Sí, la de Elon Musk. Solo 3 reglas. Gráfico de 5 minutos. $372 expectancy. 63% de acierto. En dos meses ha generado +$15,000. Y las operaciones duran menos de 30 minutos. Es 100% sistemática. Si llegamos a 200 reacciones, la hago PÚBLICA :) Vamos!!
🔥224👍29❤19👏12🤩7❤🔥6🎉4🙏4
Si llevas meses leyendo "necesitas un sistema" y todavía no tienes ni idea de qué caraj* es un sistema… Ve este video. Lo grabé porque yo también estuve ahí. Años. Y ahora vivo del trading sistemático. Esto es lo que me hubiese gustado saber al principio. https://youtu.be/WbCmQ9gsQIw?si=IXLQ7_fXqfbBbucA Aprovéchalo! Cuando lo veas deja tu reacción. Así sabré que vas por el camino correcto.
🎉14🔥13👏7👍6🙏3❤2🥰1
Buenos días! Así va este año en mi cuenta de gestión profesional. Sin sobresaltos, sin "sustos" o sorpresas, y eso es EXACTAMENTE para lo que trabajo día a día. Los sistemas me permiten llevar mi trading de forma PROFESIONAL, y no como una apostadora... Eso es lo que me permite vivir del trading. Y mientras antes lo entiendas, mejor. Si eso es lo que estás buscando, estás en el camino correcto.
❤44🔥9🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @Tradeitsimple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vacantesremotas · 128,704
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@joinalexruiz · 34,809
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
@marcianotechoficial · 36,437
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
@invertirdesdecero_oficial · 53,501
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
@InvestmentNewsEsp · 52,464
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@PabloGilTraderOficial · 48,202
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@adriansaenzc · 32,684
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
@miastral · 128,662
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trade it simple by Mariel Lang” (@Tradeitsimple), 9,981 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tradeitsimple.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.