Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 65 days, net -953. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,739–27,978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Oct 2026, 02:45
26,882
-18
17 Oct 2026, 03:38
26,900
-11
16 Oct 2026, 02:05
26,911
-22
15 Oct 2026, 02:37
26,933
-16
14 Oct 2026, 00:18
26,949
-57
11 Oct 2026, 01:18
27,006
-61
6 Oct 2026, 17:19
27,067
-97
1 Oct 2026, 20:54
27,164
-203
18 Sept 2026, 10:57
27,367
-27
16 Sept 2026, 02:17
27,394
-28
14 Sept 2026, 12:18
27,422
-24
12 Sept 2026, 20:58
27,446
-20
11 Sept 2026, 00:21
27,466
-36
8 Sept 2026, 02:36
27,502
-37
5 Sept 2026, 00:18
27,539
-16
3 Sept 2026, 06:46
27,555
-9
2 Sept 2026, 04:56
27,564
-12
1 Sept 2026, 07:39
27,576
-17
31 Aug 2026, 10:23
27,593
-21
30 Aug 2026, 10:38
27,614
first reading
Engagement
83 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.26%
avg views ÷ 26,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,490
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 83 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held
83 (21 July 2026 – 17 October 2026)
Views total
67,237
Reactions total
2,941
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
622
Videos
97
Links
89
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8m 03s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,614 reactions across 81 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,289
71.4%
🔥
1,315
11.3%
❤🔥
729
6.28%
👍
202
1.74%
🙏
199
1.71%
👏
170
1.46%
🤣
132
1.14%
🕊
91
0.784%
💯
62
0.534%
⚡
58
0.499%
✍
48
0.413%
🗿
44
0.379%
🤝
44
0.379%
🫡
39
0.336%
🏆
27
0.232%
👌
24
0.207%
🤯
20
0.172%
🐳
15
0.129%
😎
14
0.121%
🥰
10
0.086%
23 further kinds
82
0.706%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,614 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dios usa tus debilidades para fortalecerte, sino mira cuando Pablo le pidió a Dios que le quitara el aguijon, le dijo que no y le contesto que su poder se fortalece en la debilidad. Muchos no entienden esto, pero es tan simple que cuando te sientes débil te apartas y dejas que Dios actúe a través de ti, solo ahi es cuando puedes experimentar todo el poder de Dios en ti.
Cuando te crees perfecto y crees que no tienes…
El dinero por si solo no te hace exitoso, es el conjunto de principios por el que riges tu vida. De verdad llamas a un asesion que hace millones “exitoso”, de verdad llamas a una persona que vende productos de 💩 y hace millones “exitoso”
Un principio basico para mi es “si la otra persona no se beneficia, yo no lo hago, por mucho dinero que me generara”
El problema es que las personas intentan solo adquirir en vez d…
Aun estoy por conocer al emprendedor que hace +200k mes que “no le gusta invertir”, que no le gusta “ser vendido”
En cambio TODOS los emprendedores con los que hablo que hacen menos de 30k/mes y estan estancados casualmente “no estan para invertir” 🤣
Okey una masterclass para mis emprendedores principiantes que estan haciendo menos de 30k/mes, lo primero enhorabuena 💪🏻 lo digo de verdad, habeis hecho lo mas dificil…
Las personas que no tienen un nivel espiritual alto odian vender por eso no crecen sus negocios. Los que odian vender es porque odian ser vendidos, porque aman el dinero, tienen el dinero en un pedestal por eso detestan las personas que intentan quitárselo, valoran mas el dinero que el valor que puede ofrecer invertir el dinero. Como no quieren que nadie les venda nada ellos tampoco haran muchas ventas, estas persona…
Niveles de la RIQUEZA
(Dibujar una escalera con escalones para representarlo)
NIvel 1 (EMPLEO) 1k-6k/mes : Implementación: músculo x tiempo: te da un pago limitado (músculo y tiempo es limitado)
Nivel 2 (MANAGER) 6K-20K/mes : manejar a personas que trabajan (AUN TU JEFE ES TU AMO)
LA RIQUEZA ES ESPIRITUAL, manejar a personas que trabajan es una actividad espiritual mas elevada que trabajar tu mismo
La riqueza e…
Existen tres niveles principales que quieres trabajar si quieres tener exito con tu negocio, lamentablemente lo mas común es que emprendedores solo trabajen el primer nivel
El nivel 1 es la mentalidad, aunque no seas consciente este nivel lo has trabajado si has ido de empleado a vivir de tu negocio, porque la única diferencia entre un empleado que gana un salario normal y un emprendedor que genera 20k al mes es su …
La verdad mas bonita es que todo aquel que tenga un genuino deseo en su corazón para crear riqueza puede cumplir ese sueño
Tu EGO creara resistencia a esto o incluso tu falta de FE porque aun no has recibido una respuesta de “como crear esta riqueza”, lo que no entiendes es que el “COMO” ya reside dentro de ti y no lo vas a encontrar copiando a otras personas que ya generan riqueza de manera natural
En estado natur…
Todos quieren que el camino esté iluminado desde el principio hasta el final antes de empezar a caminarlo.
La realidad es que respondiendo la llamada de la conciencia es como el camino se va iluminando paso a paso
Lo unico que tienes que hacer es simplificar tu vida. Tu objetivo cada dia deberia ser no romper caracter. Cuando lo haces te quedas atrapado en un evento pasado y te desalineas de quien realmente eres y …
El crecimiento de tu negocio puede hacerte sentir mejor o puede destruirte.
¿Entonces cual es la diferencia entre crecer y autodestruirse?
Tan simple como la sabiduría y el propósito. El problema no es querer mas, es la avaricia sin sabiduría
Cuando creces sin propósito el dinero te hace sentir vacio
Cuando creces sin sabiduría no sabes como manejar ese dinero
Entonces ¿como evitas o solucionas este problema com…
Muchos dicen que conocen a Jesus, pero el dia del juicio final Jesus dira a muchos “Aparta, nunca te conoci”
Solo aquellos que hacen la voluntad de Dios los conoce Jesus
Porque esto es muy importante ⚠️ te enseña que lo que dices no vale de nada, solo lo que haces
Mis acciones dicen que Jesus me conoce, ahora hazte tu la pregunta ¿Tus acciones dicen que Jesus te conoce?
Todo reside en alineacion, es lo UNICO que …
La riqueza sin sabiduría es una maldición. El dinero en manos de un necio es un arma de autodestrucción.
Por eso, algunas personas ascienden rápidamente y caen aún más deprisa: su carácter no pudo soportar su fortuna.
Antes de pedir riquezas, pide la sabiduría para administrarlas.
El dinero es el mejor maestro espiritual, la energia del dinero te enseña a amarte a ti mismo, si no aprendes, tarde o temprano, el dinero se esfumara.
En vez de pensar que mas dinero te traerá una vida que amas, entiende que todo sentimiento que quieres experimentar ya vive dentro de ti. Al encontrar todos los sentimientos que quieres experimentar dentro de ti, te sentirás pleno y serás abundante, ahi descubrirás q…
❤85❤🔥10🤣5🏆4👏3🔥2👍1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @lladosmasterclassgratis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@lladosmasterclassgratis edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wealthy Trades @wealthytradesacademy · 115,666 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
TeamTate Updates @TatesRealLifeUpdates · 45,363 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Llados University” (@lladosmasterclassgratis), 26,882 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lladosmasterclassgratis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.