Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 트릴리온

Channel

트릴리온

@Trillion_labs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

10,148subscribers

+916 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003402415038
TypeChannel
Username@Trillion_labs
Description-법정 가이드라인 - 25.11 • 블로그 및 텔레그램에 업로드 되는 모든 종목은 작성자 및 작성자와 연관된 사람들이 보유하고 있을 가능성이 있습니다. 필수 고지사항 개인적 공부 및 기록 목적 투자 권유/조언 아님 금융투자업 등록 없음 투자 판단은 본인 책임 손실 책임 지지 않음 특정 종목 매수/매도를 권유하지 않습니다. 원자재 산업 분석 예정.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Trillion_labs

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,22010,1489,6846 August 2026 — 9,232 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,235 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,228 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,220 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,254 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,255 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,286 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,292 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,323 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,322 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,315 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,351 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,395 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,443 subscribers30 September 2026 — 9,686 subscribers7 October 2026 — 9,713 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,736 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,812 subscribers19 October 2026 — 9,840 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,901 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,053 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,099 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,105 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,106 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,111 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,124 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,127 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,126 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,127 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,141 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,144 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,148 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
32 measurements spanning 93 days, net +916. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,081–10,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 22:0710,148+4
5 Nov 2026, 22:1510,144+3
4 Nov 2026, 22:4110,141+14
4 Nov 2026, 01:0110,127+1
3 Nov 2026, 00:5910,126-1
1 Nov 2026, 22:3910,127+3
30 Oct 2026, 19:0110,124+13
29 Oct 2026, 19:4810,111+5
28 Oct 2026, 19:2910,106+1
27 Oct 2026, 18:5710,105+6
26 Oct 2026, 19:0110,099+46
25 Oct 2026, 20:2710,053+152
23 Oct 2026, 03:069,901+61
19 Oct 2026, 21:569,840+28
16 Oct 2026, 20:069,812+76
13 Oct 2026, 13:199,736+23
7 Oct 2026, 13:369,713+27
30 Sept 2026, 18:569,686+243
16 Sept 2026, 00:579,443+48
12 Sept 2026, 18:169,395first reading

Engagement

556 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 10,148 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
157 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.486%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
158
of 556 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 113 of 157 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held556 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total241,329
Reactions total919
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,910
Videos
≈494
Links
≈1,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 42s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,518 reactions across 358 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳2,518100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 369 of the 556 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,560 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 556 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 30 of 158 posts held from the last 30 days (19.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 08:44 UTC654 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

젠슨황과 스파이녀 사진 메가스피드는 동남아시아에 데이터 센터를 건설한 후 알리바바에 컴퓨팅 파워를 임대해 주면서 중국이 엔비디아의 첨단 칩에 접근할 수 있는 우회 경로를 제공했습니다. 엔비디아는 미국 정부의 제재로 중국에 직접 칩을 판매할 수 없습니다. 이 네트워크는 지역적인 연결망 외에도 중국 최대 군사 기술 제조업체 중 하나인 중국전자기술그룹(CETG)의 사이버 보안 자회사에 투자하는 등 중국 군부와도 재정적으로 연결되어 있습니다. 11월 5일, 영향력 있는 하원 3개 위원회의 공화당 지도부는 젠슨 황에게 이달 말 앨리스 황(성만 같을 뿐 친척 관계는 아님)과의 관계에 대해 비공개 브리핑에 출석할 것을 요청했습니다. 지난주 젠슨 황이 중국 정보기관의 공작 대상이었고, 미국 정보기관이 중국 시민인 앨리스 황을 최소 1년 동안 전자 …

🐳2

7 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC772 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

시가 활어도 저렇게 폭락하면 시벌 사장이 장사 접겠구만

🐳3

7 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC790 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

블룸버그에 따르면, 앤트로픽의 기업공개(IPO)에 참여하려는 투자자들은 현재 기업가치를 낮게는 1조 1,000억 달러 수준으로 평가하고 있습니다. 점점 구려지는구만 3주전에 2조였는데 얼마씩 떨어지는거야 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

🐳1

7 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,480 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

미국에게 들어올때는 마음대로였지만 나갈때는 아니란다 시전중인 외교정책위원장

🐳4

7 Nov 2026, 04:47 UTC≈1,410 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

이번 겨울은 1주일만 추워도 미래가 암울해지는 소식들밖에 없네

🐳1

7 Nov 2026, 04:46 UTC≈1,360 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-11-06/china-to-cut-diesel-exports-on-tight-stocks-energy-aspects-says 에너지 전문 분석기관 에너지 애프터눈 티에 따르면, 중국은 재고 부족으로 디젤 수출을 줄일 예정이다. 디젤 출하량 전망치 하향 슬슬 루머가 아닌가본데? 하긴 뭐 재고상황보면 디젤 수출 줄이는게 당연해보이긴해서

🐳1

7 Nov 2026, 04:44 UTC≈1,250 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

속보: 터키는 미국의 압력으로 이란을 경유하는 투르크메니스탄산 천연가스 수입을 중단했습니다. 터키는 이란의 운송망을 통해 연간 13억 세제곱미터의 투르크메니스탄산 가스를 공급받는 계약에 따라 2025년 3월부터 가스를 수입해 왔습니다.

🐳3

7 Nov 2026, 04:43 UTC≈1,210 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026

카타르는 총리가 미국과 이란 간 회담이 결렬됐다고 말했다는 보도를 부인했습니다. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 개그맨들이냐 진짜? 하긴뭐 파키스탄 카타르 둘다 답도 없는데 꼭두각시마냥 굴수밖에 없지. 근데 우리는 이미 압니다 케슘섬 때린거부터 불발이라는걸 중재중에 누가 공습을 가합니까?

🐳4

7 Nov 2026, 04:31 UTC≈1,360 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026

다음주도 맘준비들 하시는게 좋아보이네요

🐳12

7 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC≈1,770 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026

속보: 카타르 외무장관은 미국과 이란이 포괄적인 합의에 도달하지 못했다고 공식 발표했습니다. 이로써 약 6개월간 진행된 카타르의 중재 노력이 종료되었습니다. 카타르 아가리 구라는 알아줘야해 유구하지

🐳8

7 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC≈1,670 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

이정도 정유시설 폭파가 지속되면 유가의 상단선은 좀 낮아질수있긴할텐데 정제품 가격은 미친놈마냥 튈테니까 인플레 자체는 답이 없네

🐳5

Showing the 12 most recent of 556 posts we hold for @Trillion_labs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Trillion_labs edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“트릴리온” (@Trillion_labs), 10,148 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trillion_labs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.