Modesty isn’t a title; it’s a part of being a Muslimah. ✨
❤8❤🔥2👍2

Channel
@Truemuslimah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,833subscribers
-68 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001681198214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Truemuslimah |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Truemuslimah |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 10,833 | -12 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 10,845 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 10,846 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 10,851 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 10,854 | -13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 10,867 | -9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 10,876 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 10,880 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:32 | 10,884 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 10,881 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 10,883 | +8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 10,875 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 10,879 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 10,882 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 10,883 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 10,885 | -14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 10,899 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 10,893 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 10,892 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 10,893 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (26 June 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,527 |
| Reactions total | 150 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,246 reactions across 31 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,099 | 88.2% | |
| 💯 | 53 | 4.25% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 3.53% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 0.883% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.562% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.482% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 0.482% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 0.401% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.321% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.241% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.161% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.161% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.08% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.08% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.08% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Modesty isn’t a title; it’s a part of being a Muslimah. ✨
❤8❤🔥2👍2
One day one spouse will bury the other. And one day every one of us will stand before Allah. Don't let a device designed to connect you to the whole world disconnect you from the people Allah placed closest to you. Tonight, put the phone down. Sit beside your spouse. Sit with your children. Open the Qur'an. Talk to each other again. Your home needs your presence more than the internet does. Team AMAU www.amauaca…
❤19👍6💯1
Some Muslim couples don't have a marriage problem. They have a phone problem. They live in the same house, sleep in the same room and eat at the same table, yet barely spend any real time together. The husband is on YouTube. The wife is on Instagram. And whenever there is a free moment, instead of speaking to each other, both reach for their phones. Slowly, without even noticing, something dies. The long conversa…
❤14💘2💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤33🔥4💯3❤🔥2
We wonder why things go wrong! 🚗 New car? Take a selfie. Put it on social media 🏋🏻 Worked out at the gym? Take a selfie. Put it on social media 🎂 Family celebration? Take a selfie. Put it on social media. 💼 New job? Take a selfie. Put it on social media. 🩶 Cute son/daughter? Take a selfie. Put it on social media 🎓 Just graduated? Take a selfie. Put it on social media 🍲 Nice meal? Take a selfie. Put it on socia…
❤51💯2
Don't Turn Love Into Innovation No one loved the Messenger of Allah ﷺ more than Allah, then the Messenger ﷺ himself, then his noble Companions رضي الله عنهم. So ask yourself sincerely: Is there a single ayah supporting the celebration of Mawlid? NO. Did the Prophet ﷺ ever encourage his Ummah to celebrate his birthday? NO. Did any of the Sahabah رضي الله عنهم celebrate it, or take his birthday as a special o…
❤21
Motherhood Is Worship Being a mother is not an obstacle in your Ibadah. It is one of the greatest fields of worship when done sincerely for the sake of Allah. Those sleepless nights? That’s Sabr. Nursing through exhaustion? That’s Sadaqah. The routine household chores? That’s Ihsan, even when nobody notices. Teaching your child their first words of Dhikr is Dawah, whether they ever practice it or not. Rocking your…
❤20👍2👏1
A woman’s true success is found in honouring Allah’s guidance. Modesty is dignity, protection, and honour.
❤19👍9💯3
Your Exhaustion Is Not in Vain Whenever you feel yourself getting tired and unmotivated to study, remind yourself that this is for the sake of Allaah. Tiredness for the sake of Allāh. Struggle for the sake of Allāh. Exhaustion for the sake of Allāh. You won't feel this exhaustion forever. There will come a day when there is no fatigue, no burnout, no heavy eyelids, no aching mind. That day is in Jannah. The path…
❤45💯3👍2
Waking up for Fajr is hard. Living with the guilt of missing it is harder. Choose your hard. Raising righteous children is hard. Watching your children grow up without the deen is harder. Choose your hard. Lowering your gaze is hard. Protecting your heart from the consequences of what you chose to look at is harder. Choose your hard. Leaving what is haram is hard. Living with the consequences of disobeying Allah i…
❤53💯1
⚠️ 𝗔 𝗦𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴: 𝗪𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝘆𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗹-𝗞𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗶 𝗝𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿𝘆 Many people today are selling and wearing necklaces and bracelets with Āyat al-Kursī, believing they will offer protection. But what is the difference between this and an amulet (taʿwīdh)? The Prophet ﷺ said: Whoever wears an amulet has committed shirk. [Musnad Aḥmad (16969)] The Prophet ﷺ made it clear that wearing amulets is shirk, as protection comes from Al…
❤15💯2
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Truemuslimah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“True Muslimah” (@Truemuslimah), 10,833 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Truemuslimah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.