你们喜欢股票交易吗?
- - 喜欢43%
- - 不喜欢57%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍7
Signed Hamza Jbour

Channel
@UE_Ultra
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
33,610subscribers
+14,259 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003851911851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UE_Ultra |
| Description | 虚幻引擎全能专家 | 核心技术深拆 覆盖:三角洲行动 (Delta Force) / 和平精英 (PUBGM) / 无畏契约 (Valorant Mobile) 从底层代码到全局掌控。全网唯一的硬核技术流,带你突破游戏规则的上限。 在这里; 老板 : @hamzajbour , @ASGA8 @UEUltraKeyBot |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UE_Ultra |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 33,610 | +67 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 33,543 | +60 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 33,483 | +164 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 33,319 | +214 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 33,105 | +127 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 32,978 | +163 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 32,815 | +169 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 32,646 | +195 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 32,451 | +401 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 32,050 | +526 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:09 | 31,524 | +283 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 31,241 | +377 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 30,864 | -189 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 31,053 | -586 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 31,639 | +3,627 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 28,012 | +311 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 27,701 | +519 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 27,182 | +685 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 26,497 | +1,608 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 24,889 | first reading |
141 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 141 (3 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 906,784 |
| Reactions total | 12,000 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 19:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,000 reactions across 139 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8,087 | 67.4% | |
| ❤ | 1,162 | 9.68% | |
| 😭 | 315 | 2.63% | |
| 😍 | 304 | 2.53% | |
| 🤬 | 255 | 2.13% | |
| 🕊 | 229 | 1.91% | |
| 🖕 | 180 | 1.50% | |
| 🤣 | 151 | 1.26% | |
| 😱 | 140 | 1.17% | |
| 🤔 | 140 | 1.17% | |
| 🤮 | 138 | 1.15% | |
| 💩 | 116 | 0.967% | |
| 👎 | 95 | 0.792% | |
| 🍌 | 86 | 0.717% | |
| 🤓 | 75 | 0.625% | |
| 🥰 | 73 | 0.608% | |
| 🔥 | 72 | 0.6% | |
| 👏 | 62 | 0.517% | |
| 🤡 | 56 | 0.467% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 0.442% | |
| 24 further kinds | 211 | 1.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
你们喜欢股票交易吗?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍7
Signed Hamza Jbour
杨雪直播使用版本 功能设置: 无后 聚点 开火自瞄 开镜自瞄 颜色设置: 人机上色 人机颜色 真人颜色 透墙显示 调节设置: 自瞄部位[头][胸][腿][指哪打哪] 自瞄速度 自瞄范围 自瞄距离 自瞄锁定所需时间 下载链接 https://pan.quark.cn/s/7cf6f83a74b3
👍14💩4🔥2❤1🥰1
Signed 诚铭(十年磨一剑)认准+888
十年磨一剑
👍76🤮12🔥4❤3🗿2😍1
Signed JS(认准礼物)
Tools for sale: - Delta PAK unpacking tool - Arena PAK unpacking tool @hamzajbour
👍125❤23🤣20🤔12😡8🕊7🤮5
Signed Hamza Jbour
50%
👍151🕊15❤13😭12🤓8😁7🔥3🤔3
Signed 诚铭(十年磨一剑)认准+888
🇨🇳拼多多数据号【质量】🙈 售后24小时在线 (服务拉满!) 主营:『和平无限授权号』『和平Q直登V扫码号 『安卓iOS和平数据号』『三角洲暗区火影数据号』 😀新增全网最低价无限授权号😀 🔗24小时自助下单链接🔗 请在购买付款时开启录屏⭐ 👍购买链接: 卡网1:https://luoye.chyidc.cn/shop/6Y3F1T5Q 卡网2:https://luoye.chyidc.cn/shop/6Y3F1T5Q 【全网最低价不信你来看看】 😋二卖出门被车撞死😋 👍圈钱出门被车撞死👍 😡 售后客服 @QXZYNB 进入每周免费发放100+数据号频道 进入每周免费发放100+数据号频道 进入每周免费发放100+数据号频道 进入每周免费发放100+数据号频道
👍51🤣7❤6
Signed 诚铭(十年磨一剑)认准+888
https://v.kuaishou.com/nqmkvLN1 JS(Hook地球)的直播很精彩,快来围观!点击链接,打开【快手】直接观看!
👍64❤2😍2
Signed JS(认准礼物)
免费的卡密 LHVA-WP8B-5NX-MGAD 7465-M4VR-NMJ-AEJR GHGV-BHL9-G3G-X772 GSWK-7824-M6D-XMQX AYBX-WQLK-86H-HPNK 2KX5-ZZUN-SSF-D2MG GCBQ-4VWX-F2Q-ENSA 57H4-JFDJ-E5A-86FJ ACHY-7KG5-W6Q-3V8V B3EC-3CRA-7AC-NYZ4 Z7SG-SB92-ZAS-A3SK 7LMR-824U-NWQ-DABW LHUA-XSNR-HYR-S6U5 DP9N-JTB2-QTJ-PZHZ 5L8K-6MZ5-Y23-W5WF HH3B-R5TM-UZ2-Z8HY M5CL-L758-X6B-C3YH GKYH-ANP6-YXP-V3MJ 67NY-VGSQ-NWZ-F6T6 4T89-YX7F-82K-SMHQ ZF7X-NZW9-XKE-PSR3 VEC6-86Q6-PRV-S…
❤43👍43🥰3🎉2🔥2
Signed JS(认准礼物)
庆祝频道人数32k 给大家发一个红包
👍38❤3😍2😱1
💰 转账给你 23.89 U 请在24小时内领取
👍37❤3😍2😱1
庆祝频道人数31k 给大家发一个红包
👍16
🎉🧧红包发送成功🧧🎉 ✔️起点QiDian发送了 一个红包! 💵总金额: 8888 U💰 📊 剩余: 168/388 🥇 88.88 USDT - 花花 🥈 78.26 USDT - 白嫖王 - 鬼 🥉 68.61 USDT - 叙白色
👍19
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @UE_Ultra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
你们喜欢股票交易吗?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你们希望 UI 界面是什么样的?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,534,419 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UE 极客核心 | 全球端手游联动” (@UE_Ultra), 33,610 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UE_Ultra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.