USA Crypto Group - Investors Hub pinned «Bullish on Robinhood chain?»

Channel
USA Crypto Group - Investors Hub
@USACryptoGroupOfficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,731subscribers
+382 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001787065446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @USACryptoGroupOfficial |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/USACryptoGroupOfficial |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 21,731 | -151 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 21,882 | +4,891 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 16,991 | -123 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:25 | 17,114 | -119 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 17,233 | -88 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 17,321 | -98 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 17,419 | -129 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 17,548 | -111 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 17,659 | -33 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 17,692 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 17,712 | -55 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 17,767 | -82 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 17,849 | -71 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 17,920 | -69 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 17,989 | -86 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 18,075 | -506 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 18,581 | -63 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 18,644 | -71 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 18,715 | -143 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 18,858 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.86%
- avg views ÷ 21,731 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,930
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.364%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (13 June 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,850 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
159 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 62 | 39.0% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 28.3% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 24.5% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 6.92% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Bullish on Robinhood chain?
- Very bullish!53%
- It's ok14%
- Not really20%
- Post projects on Robinhood.30%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4
USA Crypto Group - Investors Hub pinned a photo
BREAKING: SEC Unveils Plan to Reopen Public Crypto Token Sales to Everyday U.S. InvestorsThe Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed a major new framework that could once again let crypto projects sell tokens directly to retail investors in the United States—potentially reviving a clearer, regulated version of the old ICO fundraising model. Under the proposed “Regulation Crypto Assets,” early-stage crypto st…
👍5❤4🔥1
USA Crypto Group - Investors Hub pinned a photo
USA CRYPTO GROUP WEEKLY CASH PREDICTION 🤯 PREDICTION: Bitcoin 8-12-2026 @ 12PM PST Current Price: $64,831.85 💲PRIZE: $15 Cash - 1 winner! RULES: 1) Reply to this pinned post at @USACryptoGroup with the price (example price: $77,569.57 2) Closest price prediction wins 3) 1 prediction per person 4) No editing 5) Prediction stops on 8-10-2026 @ 12PM PST 6) Price will be based off CoinMarketCap 7) Winner announcement…
👍9❤4🔥1
USA Crypto Group - Investors Hub pinned «What is going on USA? What is your sentiment on the markets? Who is still here with us? A lot of things are coming!!»
What is going on USA? What is your sentiment on the markets? Who is still here with us? A lot of things are coming!!
👍12❤2
USA Crypto Group - Investors Hub pinned «😍Ansem went from 137 million to 400 million mc Posted Dextools Bull yesterday at 1.3 mil and went to 4 million mc overnight. Get your notification on, we will continue to find gems. Cheers! Not financial advice.»
😍Ansem went from 137 million to 400 million mc Posted Dextools Bull yesterday at 1.3 mil and went to 4 million mc overnight. Get your notification on, we will continue to find gems. Cheers! Not financial advice.
👍7❤3🥰2
6xCtR2Eq1VumsoRdNutcfSQfLMk7xUa2BrMx18tqpump https://www.dextools.io/app/solana/pair-explorer/9x3m3XwFFZeJdSjB9zNSQdw5pooQ5Q7wurB3rSmbmcoj Dextools launched its meme token. I think it's undervalued currently . Robinhood memes are popping out, will post a few that we think have a lot of potential.
🔥4❤2
USA Crypto Group - Investors Hub pinned «Meme season??!!! https://www.dextools.io/app/solana/pair-explorer/FnzKY6x7entQ1eR3D225dQyT7ybfka4PskBMQhb8L3CC»
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @USACryptoGroupOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Bullish on Robinhood chain?
- Very bullish!53%
- It's ok14%
- Not really20%
- Post projects on Robinhood.30%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What is your altcoin sentiment??
- I'm feeling it35%
- Shit35%
- Very soon, bullish.37%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@OfficialSportybets · 57,599
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
@crypto_whale_global_annn · 41,578
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@CryptoFi_news · 49,794
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
@Crypto_FinderNews · 103,402
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@LowCarbonToken · 104,704
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@cryptoastronautnews · 64,209
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
@Crypto_InfinityNews · 94,277
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@BlockchainExpressAnn · 31,855
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
@MetaWhaleNews · 43,598
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@DubaicryptowhalesNews · 66,509
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 August 2026
@cryptopandaann · 61,826
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@Crypto_Planet_GlobalChannel · 55,438
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@Crypto_Trust_CommunityAnn · 41,740
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@metamoonshots · 43,312
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@CryptoPowerAnn · 75,879
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@Crypto_PoolzAnn · 56,894
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
@Tork_LabsAnn · 56,436
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
@CryptoMoonShootNews1 · 125,629
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
@SunriseVenturesAnn · 110,445
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
@CryptoSolutionAnn · 62,420
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 151,812
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@CryptoWorldClub_News · 115,919
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@Cryptoelephant_News · 83,138
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
@CoinLabVerseNews · 90,343
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“USA Crypto Group - Investors Hub” (@USACryptoGroupOfficial), 21,731 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USACryptoGroupOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.