Channel
@bravenetwork
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,266subscribers
-128 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001677891889 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bravenetwork |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bravenetwork |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 1,266 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 1,279 | -34 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 1,313 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 1,336 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 1,343 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 1,360 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 1,362 | +10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,352 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 1,347 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 1,364 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 1,384 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 1,394 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 1,394 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
76 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 59.2% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📊 Kleines Follow-up zu AlgoTitan. Vor einigen Wochen hatte ich euch die Plattform bereits vorgestellt und inzwischen wurde auch der Juli-Report der BTC Shield Strategie veröffentlicht. Laut Projekt schloss die Strategie den Monat mit +7,91 % ab. Interessant finde ich dabei weniger die Zahl selbst als den vollständigen Report: Man sieht profitable Tage genauso wie Verlusttage und ruhigere Phasen. Genau so sollte ein…
❤3👍1
📊 Kurzes Follow-up zu AlgoTitan Vor einiger Zeit hatte ich die Telegram Mini App bereits vorgestellt. Inzwischen hat das Team den Monatsreport der BTC Shield Strategie für Juni veröffentlicht. Das ausgewiesene Ergebnis liegt bei +15,48 %. Was ich dabei interessanter finde als die Rendite selbst, ist der veröffentlichte Handelsverlauf. Dort sieht man nicht nur grüne Tage, sondern auch Verlusttage und ruhigere Phasen…
❤🔥4😎4👍3🔥2❤1
⚔️ League of Trenches 🌡😵 $Lot ist ähnlich wie league of legends und im singleplayer free to play. Es gibt auch nen Token, aber das ist jetzt erstmal Nebensache. Ich plane ein Event zu machen gegen die $LOT Community mit ca. 5 Leuten aus der Brave. Hätte jemand Lust? Spiel (Browser): https://goplaylot.com/ Spiel (Download): https://playlot.xyz/downloads/ Beim Server unten ganz klein zu sehen "Europa" auswählen. A…
❤3
📊 Automatisiertes Trading ohne lange Bot-Config? Der Ansatz von AlgoTitan unterscheidet sich etwas von anderen Trading Bots: Statt dutzende Parameter wie Grid, DCA, RSI, Hebel oder Stop-Loss selbst einzustellen, setzt die Telegram Mini App auf fertige Strategien, die nach Risikostufe ausgewählt werden können. Das könnte für den Einstieg interessant sein: 🟣 14 Tage kostenloser Demo-Modus 🟣 Trading mit virtuellem Ka…
📌 Kaskad - Update #2 In unserem ersten Beitrag haben wir Kaskad als Lending-Projekt im Kaspa-Ökosystem vorgestellt. Wer tiefer in das Projekt einsteigen möchte, sollte sich die unten verlinkte Analyse auf YouTube anschauen. Dabei geht es nicht nur um das Lending-Protokoll selbst, sondern auch um Themen wie die Layer-2-Struktur auf Igra, die Oracle-Technologie, Governance, Tokenomics und die langfristige Rolle von …
❤3
📌 Kaskad – Lending auf Kaspa Kaspa hat in den letzten Jahren eine starke Community, wachsende Infrastruktur und immer mehr Projekte aufgebaut. Eine der großen DeFi-Komponenten fehlt bisher jedoch weitgehend: Lending. Denn irgendwann stellt sich für viele Holder dieselbe Frage: "Wie kann man sein KAS nutzen, ohne es verkaufen zu müssen?" 👀 Und genau hier setzt Kaskad an: Das Team entwickelt aktuell ein Lending-Pr…
❤2
👤 MEXC Deutsch @MEXC_DE 1m ago 💬 0 🔁 0 ❤️ 1 👁 4 Am 25. Mai war offizieller Kaskad ($KSKD) Launch exklusiv auf MEXC. Kaskad bringt Lending, Liquidität und neue Infrastruktur ins Kaspa-Ökosystem. Genau das wollen wir heute gemeinsam mit euch feiern. 🎁 Gemeinsam mit Kaskad verlosen wir 1.000 USDC in $KSKD an 10 Gewinner. So nehmt ihr teil👇 ✅ Folgt @MEXC_DE ✅ Folgt @AppKaskad ✅ Joint unserer Telegram Community …
🇪🇺 Europa verändert gerade den Kryptomarkt. MiCA, neue Regeln, mehr Erwartungen der Nutzer … Die Zeiten von „einfach nur eine Börse“ sind vorbei. Jetzt geht es um Vertrauen, Transparenz und echte Nutzung. 👀 🎙️ Morgen sprechen @PhiloH_web3 und MEXC CEO @usithetalk genau darüber – offen und ungefiltert. 📅 27. Mai | 19:00 Uhr (UTC+2) 🔊 Live auf X Space ⏰ Reminder: x.com/i/spaces/1nxnR… Seid dabei 🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭🇳🇱🇵🇱🇫🇷🇪🇸
❤2
Crypcon Festival 2026 | 20.06. Am 20.06. findet eines der größten Krypto Community Events des Jahres in Deutschland statt. Knapp 25 der bekanntesten Krypto KOLs aus Deutschland sind live vor Ort. Dazu kommen Creator, Communities, Trader, Investoren und viele bekannte Gesichter aus der Szene. Was euch erwartet: 9:00 bis 17:00 Uhr All inclusive Konferenztag mit Bühnenprogramm, Vorträgen, Interviews, Panel Discussio…
❤9🔥3🎉1
Heute um 20:00 Uhr (CET) sprechen wir gemeinsam mit Kaskad über das Projekt, den Mainnet Launch und die Rolle von Lending im Kaspa-Ökosystem. Themen: • Was genau ist Kaskad? • Warum setzt das Projekt auf Kaspa? • Wie funktioniert das Oracle-Modell? • Welche Vision steckt hinter dem Protokoll? 🎙 AMA / Community Talk auf X 🕗 22. Mai — 20:00 Uhr CET 📍 https://x.com/MEXC_DE 🌍 Englisch (mainly) + deutscher Community Sup…
🎉1
🎙"Krypto Community 2026" | Mittwoch, 20. Mai um 20:30 Uhr! Ich spring nächsten Mittwoch Abend gemeinsam mit einigen anderen Gästen in einen X-Space. Thema hier soll "Krypto-Community 2026" sein, was ich auch zum Anlass nehmen werde, mies über euch alle abzurotzen. Wer dabei sein will, merkt sich den Termin Gäste: @Jan_Synergy - Synergy Media @rbnwlf - KryptoWölfe @CryptoFamilie_YouTube - Crypto Familie @Coin_Tom …
❤5🦄2
🔴 Live: Brave Review – Pre Space Signals Heute um 23 Uhr findet erneut ein größerer X-Space statt. Wer mag, schaut sich die 3 Teilnehmer etwas genauer an: https://x.com/meme_sweep https://x.com/VoidKittyDev https://x.com/thehouse_solana Sofern ihr etwas Feedback für mich habt, oder Dinge unklar sind, knallt gern ne Nachricht in den Chat. Falls da was gescheites kommt, leite ich die spannendsten Fragen und "Signal…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bravenetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bravenetwork named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bravenetwork 🇩🇪🤝🌎 Know- and Grow Together” (@bravenetwork), 1,266 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bravenetwork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.