Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BraveCalls @Bravelounge - BravePlays

Channel

BraveCalls @Bravelounge - BravePlays

@brave_calls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,526subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001761733308
TypeChannel
Username@brave_calls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/brave_calls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4381,5851,511.57 August 2026 — 1,438 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,441 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,457 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,499 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,509 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,523 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,571 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,577 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,585 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,559 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,541 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,531 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,526 subscribers1,5267 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,416–1,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:371,526-5
14 Sept 2026, 18:411,531-10
10 Sept 2026, 18:411,541-18
5 Sept 2026, 16:201,559-26
1 Sept 2026, 06:461,585+8
29 Aug 2026, 04:251,577+6
26 Aug 2026, 07:471,571+48
23 Aug 2026, 13:051,523+14
19 Aug 2026, 21:451,509+10
16 Aug 2026, 19:141,499+42
10 Aug 2026, 05:511,457+16
7 Aug 2026, 12:461,441+3
7 Aug 2026, 05:321,438first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1050.0%
🔥525.0%
🎉210.0%
👏210.0%
👍15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC366 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊 A small follow-up on AlgoTitan. A few weeks ago I introduced the platform, and in the meantime the July report for the BTC Shield strategy has been released. According to the project, the strategy finished July with a +7.91% result. What I find more interesting than the number itself is the full report: it shows profitable days, losing days, and quieter periods as well. In my opinion, that's exactly how a perform

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

1 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC366 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🟢 Boosters run the League RSYST BUY! ◼️◼️◼️◼️ 👍 $48.34 (0.02587 ETH) 👍 3.05K RSYST 👍 0x5c54...25d7 ⬆️ 117.40% 👍 $0.01585325 🙂 $15.85K 👍 Web 👍 X TX | CHART | DeepBot Buy Tangem with Bobby

1

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

23 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC390 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Multi utility project. Shilled @bravelounge main group, so let’s see. https://resyst-protocol.com https://t.me/resystprotocol 0x74bb664783299f78F24A4d54c30993CF56e4678e Dyor NFA

1

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

13 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC86 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @algotitan_aiPhoto

🩸 True or false: 5 automation myths, checked "A good strategy never has red days." ❌ False. Every strategy has them. The good ones plan for them. "Automated means it can access my funds." ❌ False. Trade-only API. Withdrawals stay physically impossible. "More trades means better results." ❌ False. Every trade costs fees and risk. Selective beats busy. "You can revoke access in seconds." ✅ True. Delete the API key on

👍1

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

2 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC406 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊 Automated trading without spending hours configuring a bot? I came across AlgoTitan, and the approach is a bit different from what most trading bots offer. Instead of setting up dozens of parameters like Grid, DCA, RSI, leverage or stop-losses, the Telegram Mini App provides ready-made strategies that can be selected based on your preferred risk level. A few things that stood out to me: 🟣 14-day free demo mode 🟣

7🔥5🎉2👏2

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

1 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC332 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

👤 TassHub @TassHubCrypto 20h ago 💬 1 🔁 2 ❤️ 7 👁 59 TassHub Pitch Pit: LIVE in the Hot Seat!🔥 Hosted By: @Mystik_Crypto 🧙 Wednesday, July 1st, 5:00PM (EDT) / 9:00PM (UTC) Don't miss our Headline Features: ⭐️@adaoffshore ⭐️ ⭐️@lorelabs_⭐️ ⭐️@lilpissin⭐️ Three projects step up to take the spotlight! Live questions, real conversations. Supported by: @BraveLounge Want to join our next show? Contact: @Mystik_Cryp

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

9 Jun 2026, 12:20 UTC402 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 Kaskad Update #2 When people think about lending protocols, they usually focus on borrowing, collateral and yields. But one of the most important pieces often stays in the background: Price data. In lending protocols, liquidations, collateral ratios and risk management all depend on accurate pricing. Incorrect or manipulated prices can lead to unnecessary liquidations and increased risk for users. That's one

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

1 Jun 2026, 11:30 UTC236 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Kaskad — A bounded governance lending protocol for humans and AI agents, powered by an in-house COB Oracle integration - soon live on Kaspa ⚠️ Problems 1. Kaspa holders want to use their KAS bag without selling it. 2. The current Kaspa ecosystem lacks a competitive & compliant lending layer to onboard users & institutions 3. Existing oracles do not report assets' fair prices, exposing users to unnecessary liquidat

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

27 May 2026, 05:50 UTC84 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

TassHub Pitch Pit: LIVE in the Hot Seat! 🔥🎙 Wednesday, May. 27th, 5:00PM (EDT) / 9:00PM (UTC) https://x.com/TassHubCrypto/status/2059414875953050081?s=20 https://x.com/i/spaces/1mGPaaZXMnXJN?s=20 Hosted By: X.com/Mystik_Crypto 🧙‍♂️ Don't miss our Headline Features: ⭐️ X.com/SolanasAgents ⭐️ ⭐️ X.com/UpscalpFutures ⭐️ ⭐️ X.com/RiverHoldGame ⭐️ Three projects step up to take the spotlight! Live questions, real

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

6 May 2026, 06:48 UTC103 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bravenetworkPhoto

🔴 Live: Brave Review – Pre Space Signals Habt ihr Bock wieder 3 Projekte "auseinander zu nehmen"? Wir werfen im Rahmen des heutigen X-Spaces einen genaueren Blick auf folgende 3 Projekte: 1️⃣ https://yeetoken.vip/ 2️⃣ https://chilltown.net/ 3️⃣ https://www.lokicoin.io/ Welche Seite gefällt euch auf den ersten Blick am besten und warum? Steckt da vielleicht sogar mehr hinter diesen "Memes"? Ein Satz reicht 😉 Die

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

2 May 2026, 10:56 UTC247 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔎 Post Review Update: Gonka.ai - "Mut zur Lücke" Vorletztes Wochenende hatten wir Gonka.ai im Brave Review und haben ziemlich schnell gemerkt: 💡Ohne breiteren Blick aufs Projekt stößt man an Grenzen! Ein paar markante Stimmen aus der Community dazu: „Ist das eigentliche Produkt Blockchain oder AI?“ „Ich musste erst die Contract-Adresse suchen...“ „… selbst ne node benötigt massiv Leistung“ „Ich bin normal und somi

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

28 Apr 2026, 08:36 UTC237 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

community used to build. now it watches👀 same people. different behavior. everyone’s there. no one moves. we didn’t lose community. we changed what we use it for.

Signed William Wallet owner of @Bravelounge

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brave_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🐳CODY WHALES CALL 中國🐳
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 198,032
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BraveCalls @Bravelounge - BravePlays” (@brave_calls), 1,526 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brave_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.