Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1С: Учимся вместе 📚 / Василий про 1С

Channel

1С: Учимся вместе 📚 / Василий про 1С

@VasiliiPro1C

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,393subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001651441964
TypeChannel
Username@VasiliiPro1C
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/VasiliiPro1C

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,3554,3944,374.56 August 2026 — 4,357 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,357 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,355 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,360 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,366 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,371 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,367 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,369 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,374 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,380 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,385 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,394 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,393 subscribers4,3936 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,349–4,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:574,393-1
13 Sept 2026, 06:554,394+9
9 Sept 2026, 05:574,385+5
4 Sept 2026, 06:184,380+6
31 Aug 2026, 13:484,374+5
28 Aug 2026, 09:434,369+2
25 Aug 2026, 19:234,367-4
22 Aug 2026, 20:044,371+5
19 Aug 2026, 06:044,366+6
15 Aug 2026, 19:584,360+5
10 Aug 2026, 00:294,355-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:534,357no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:484,357first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8929.0%
🎉8628.0%
7123.1%
💯206.51%
😁154.89%
👍92.93%
🍾51.63%
🙏51.63%
💩30.977%
🤝20.651%
🤩20.651%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VasiliiPro1C. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC997 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Увидел пост про Павла - https://t.me/GSoftCIO/351 И конечно вспомнил, как когда-то давно смотрел его открытый курс на YouTube. Тогда мне казалось невозможным понять и освоить то, о чем там рассказывал Павел, но как видите...🙃 Очень хочется, чтобы память о хороших людях в 1С продолжала жить! Если вдруг никогда не слышали про Павла, то можете почитать пост, а я поделюсь тем, что мне в свое время очень помогло в развит

18🙏5

30 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🐈 Друзья, всем привет! У нас есть несколько вакансий, которые мы сейчас ищем: 🟡Разработчик Битрикс 24 (рассматриваем почасовую оплату конкретных задач, можно рассматривать как подработку). 🟡Администратор 1С (в офис 2-3 дня в неделю, Москва). 🟡Консультант 1С (1 линия поддержки). Если тебе или твоим знакомым/друзьям/коллегам интересны вакансии, пишите мне с указанием на какую вакансию и присылайте резюме https://t.me/

🤝2

16 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,830 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥37🎉14🍾5👍21

30 Jun 2026, 08:46 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Возник вопрос, сколько нужно времени, чтобы подготовиться к экзамену 1С Специалист❓ Пишите сколько у вас ушло на это времени, посмотрим на статистику!

  1. Меньше месяца1%
  2. 1-2 месяца5%
  3. 2-3 месяца6%
  4. 3-5 месяцев10%
  5. от 6 месяцев до года11%
  6. Больше года5%
  7. Не сдавал ✍️64%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jun 2026, 08:56 UTC≈2,420 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какой результат будет по коду выше?

  1. Выведет сотрудников26%
  2. Выведет должности17%
  3. Выведет организации5%
  4. Ошибка29%
  5. Ничего не выведет12%
  6. Я честно не знаю, но хочу посмотреть!18%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTC≈2,040 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Давно рубрики "Самый умный" не было 😁 И так, какие данные выведет сообщение? Пишите ответ в комментариях! ✍️ Первому правильно ответившему самая крутая награда чата - подпись в чатике "Гений 1С" на неделю!

1🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,970 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Быть действительно компетентным по всем вопросам невозможно! 👎 Поэтому, когда мы готовим свои обучающие материалы, мы часто прибегаем к помощи профессионалов в узконаправленной области. Именно с этой идеи началось наше сотрудничество с Анной, автором очень полезного Telegram-канала «Заговори с Охотницей». Уже около года она ведет вебинары для наших учеников, рассказывая актуальную информацию про рынок труда в 1С (э

🔥144🤩2😁1

11 Jun 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,980 views87 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну что, вот мне и 32 годика стукнуло! 🥳 (еще молодой!) Спасибо всем за поздравления друзья, очень ценю и очень приятно 💛

🎉729🔥5👍1

9 Jun 2026, 16:54 UTC≈2,120 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже не первый раз натыкаюсь на статьи, которые явно написаны нейронкой — пример! Самое интересное, что другие нейронки пылесосят эти статьи и выдают на их основнии якобы решение твоей задачи. Встречали уже такое? 💯 - да, встречаю постоянно 🤔 - нет, вижу первый раз Пишите в комментариях что об этом думаете ✍️ Кто выкладывает и зачем эти статьи? А вдруг это программисты специально делают, чтобы нейронка их не заменил

💯20😁8💩31

9 Jun 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,860 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья! Сегодня на Stepik последний день распродажи 👍 Приходите к нам учиться 💛 👶 Для начинающих: 🟡1С программирование для начинающих 🟡Запросы в 1С: Углубленное изучение языка запросов 🟡1С: Система компоновки данных 🟡Аналитик 1С. Основные инструменты и ввод в профессию 🟡1С: Профессиональный пользователь 🟡Азы 1С администрирования 🟡1С программист / Практический тренажер — и сразу в 2 вариантах: — Базовый - проходишь в

🔥83

1 Jun 2026, 09:39 UTC≈1,930 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Интересно стало посмотреть на статистику. А у вы используете ИИ❓

  1. Использую постоянно в быту и в работе48%
  2. Не использую вообще10%
  3. Использую только для личных целей19%
  4. Использую в работе достаточно редко, постоянно в личных целях15%
  5. Кто такой ваш ИИ 🗿7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @VasiliiPro1C. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jun 2026, 08:46 UTCAnonymous Poll419 voters

Возник вопрос, сколько нужно времени, чтобы подготовиться к экзамену 1С Специалист❓ Пишите сколько у вас ушло на это времени, посмотрим на статистику!

  1. Меньше месяца1%
  2. 1-2 месяца5%
  3. 2-3 месяца6%
  4. 3-5 месяцев10%
  5. от 6 месяцев до года11%
  6. Больше года5%
  7. Не сдавал ✍️64%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jun 2026, 08:56 UTCAnonymous Poll252 voters

Какой результат будет по коду выше?

  1. Выведет сотрудников26%
  2. Выведет должности17%
  3. Выведет организации5%
  4. Ошибка29%
  5. Ничего не выведет12%
  6. Я честно не знаю, но хочу посмотреть!18%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jun 2026, 09:39 UTCAnonymous Poll343 voters

Интересно стало посмотреть на статистику. А у вы используете ИИ❓

  1. Использую постоянно в быту и в работе48%
  2. Не использую вообще10%
  3. Использую только для личных целей19%
  4. Использую в работе достаточно редко, постоянно в личных целях15%
  5. Кто такой ваш ИИ 🗿7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 May 2026, 11:35 UTCAnonymous Poll209 voters

А как вы относитесь к уникальной роли 1С разработчика?

  1. Хочу жесткого разграничения обязанностей40%
  2. Не против совмещать в себе несколько ролей33%
  3. Уже совмещаю в себе несколько ролей на работе36%
  4. Свой вариант в комментариях1%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1С: Учимся вместе 📚 / Василий про 1С” (@VasiliiPro1C), 4,393 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VasiliiPro1C.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.