Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Veganic TareCk

Channel

Veganic TareCk

@VeganicTareCk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,782subscribers

-182 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001073691216
TypeChannel
Username@VeganicTareCk
Created15 September 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/VeganicTareCk

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,78210,96410,8735 August 2026 — 10,964 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,964 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,960 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,958 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,955 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,954 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,949 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,945 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,939 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,946 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,941 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,933 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,930 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,929 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,928 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,922 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,916 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,911 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,903 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,895 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,893 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,888 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,883 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,881 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,877 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,872 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,866 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,851 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,839 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,831 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,825 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,824 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,817 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,799 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,782 subscribers5 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,755–10,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 16:4110,782-17
19 Sept 2026, 05:4010,799-18
16 Sept 2026, 21:0010,817-7
15 Sept 2026, 01:4010,824-1
13 Sept 2026, 14:0010,825-6
11 Sept 2026, 19:5910,831-8
9 Sept 2026, 07:5810,839-12
6 Sept 2026, 01:1510,851-15
4 Sept 2026, 01:0110,866-6
2 Sept 2026, 13:1410,872-5
1 Sept 2026, 13:3510,877-4
31 Aug 2026, 14:1110,881-2
30 Aug 2026, 15:0610,883-5
28 Aug 2026, 08:5610,888-5
27 Aug 2026, 06:4810,893-2
26 Aug 2026, 08:1210,895-8
24 Aug 2026, 11:2410,903-8
22 Aug 2026, 21:2510,911-5
21 Aug 2026, 13:0410,916-6
20 Aug 2026, 12:2210,922first reading

Engagement

186 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.99%
avg views ÷ 10,782 subscribers
Avg views / post
323
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 186 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held186 (16 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total13,228
Reactions total217
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 28m
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 99 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,265 reactions across 161 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤68854.4%
👍16613.1%
🕊806.32%
🔥503.95%
👏493.87%
🤔403.16%
🥴251.98%
🤯231.82%
🤣201.58%
💩191.50%
👎181.42%
😨181.42%
🙏161.26%
🤬110.87%
😱90.711%
😁80.632%
🌚50.395%
🥰50.395%
💯40.316%
😍40.316%
6 further kinds70.553%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 186 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,277 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 186 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC65 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfePhoto

Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑

1 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC63 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfePhoto

Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑

1 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC66 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfeVideo

MMR Quackccine Induced Cerebral Palsy. (54 seconds) Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑

1 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC65 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @davidavocadowolfePhoto

Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑

1 Sept 2026, 15:04 UTC271 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @MeemMagazinePhoto

"إذا رأيتموني فابكوا".. انخفاض مستويات المياه في أنهار أوروبا يكشف عن "حجارة الجوع" التاريخية، التي تحمل على سطحها تواريخ منقوشة توثّق فترات سابقة من الجفاف، ويعود أقدمها إلى عام 1707.

🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 14:05 UTC301 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

هذا رمز Lilith ليليث في علم الفلك قمر اسود + صليب #النخبة_والرمزيات

❤4👍3👎1

1 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC281 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026

- هي القمر الأسود ليليث/الليل/الأنثى - 6 اشخاص حواليها - 3 صواعق - تخرج من القبر (خسوف/كسوف) - تحمل سوط احمر ثم يصبح اسود - 6 راقصات/مغنيات - الأرض غرافين - تتحوّل لزومبي ليليث في علم الفلك هي القمر الأسود تمثل في الخريطة الفلكية الرغبات المكبوتة، الجروح الدفينة، التمرد، والجانب المظلم للإنسان. ايضاً تمثل الغرائز الجنسيّة، ومن هنا تفهمون مزيج اللون الأسود والأحمر في الفيديو. #شاكرا_الجذر 🔴 #Root_Chakra https://www…

❤1👍1👎1

1 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC299 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026

حديثي الآن عن لبنان لعام 2027 - 2028 متذكرين دراستي السابقة عن حصول زلزال وتسونامي في منطقة بلاد الشام ؟ اذا اردت البحث عن حدث مفاجئ شديد تسونامي/زلزال او حدث دلالته أرضية/بحرية. في ال-Mundane Astrology 🔴 اقوى نافذة ظهرت عندي (2027) من أواخر يوليو/تَمُّوز/شهر ٧ إلى أواخر أغسطس/أب/شهر ٨ لو أردت تضييق النافذة، اقول: 2 آب/اغسطس/شهر ٨ الى 20 آب/أغسطس/شهر ٨ بالمناسبة، هذا الشهر يحوي أيضاً أحداث عالمية 🔴 ثاني اقوى نا…

❤5😱3

1 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC296 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026

بالمناسبة، ابحثوا عن Carlos Ferrada

👍1

1 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC299 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026

هناك ثغرة حقيقية لا أريد تجاهلها فهرس الأجسام ليس كاملًا، يعني: مذنب طويل الدورة غير مُكتشف بعد = إمكانية علمية حقيقية

👍2

1 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC322 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

المقالات التي انشرها اليوم بدأت البحث عنها في بداية دراستي للMundane Astrology ولم انشرها الى ان اتى الأستاذ علي نورا في نهاية شهر اغسطس بهذا الفيديو وذكرني بها هنا، انتبهت لملاحظته بحثت عن خسوفات وكسوفات عام 2027 واكتشفت أن هناك كسوف كلي للشمس يوم 2 أغسطس 2027 اي حوالي نفس فترة مرور كويكب 1999 AN10 قرب القمر 😬 التي ستحصل في 7 اغسطس 2027 للأسف ليس لدي تواصل معه ولا ادري إذا يوافقني حديثي هل تراودكم افكار نفس افكاري…

👏2👍1

1 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC350 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026

من اواخر عام 2019 وأنا إحذر الجميع من "شهب/نيزك/كويكب" سيضرب الأرض المشكلة لا أحد مقتنع رغم الأدلة العديدة التي قدمتها سابقاً ادخلوا جوجل اكتبوا: The Planetary Defense Conference 2025 بالمختصر، استعملوا جنوب أفريقيا (مايو/ايّار/شهر 5 2025) كأرض للقيام بتمارين محاكاة تجريها الجهات المختصة بالدفاع الكوكبي 👀 يفترضون اكتشاف كويكب جديد، ثم يتصرف العلماء والجهات الحكومية وكأن التهديد حقيقي. وهذه ليست تجربة لمرة واحدة.…

👍5❤4🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 186 posts we hold for @VeganicTareCk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AlyaaGadHolistic
@AlyaaGadHolistic1 · 30,999
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
دراسات في العمق
@Depthstudies1 · 103,537
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
نصائح طبيه.. صحتك
@Sihatkom1 · 32,955
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
تجارب الشفاء بمادة الكيروسين
@kerosine2020 · 35,938
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
طاقة المكان
@DrMahaAttar · 24,338
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
الارض تتهيئ لأحداث عظيمة
@maysous2023 · 21,303
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026
أخبار ميسرة أسرار
@maysara2030 · 29,352
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
محمد الكيلاني | القناة الرسمية
@mohammedkilani · 33,824
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
كتب محرمة
@kotobm7ramah0 · 25,766
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
Guardian Angels🕊
@thegurdianangel37 · 80,189
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
نادي ميدو فرفوش الانجلش السري( مناهج)
@midofarfosh · 25,649
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 September 2026
رخصة المعلم انجليزي( نوره السالم )
@sakhaEdu · 23,403
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Veganic TareCk” (@VeganicTareCk), 10,782 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VeganicTareCk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.