Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Voices of the IEA

Channel

Voices of the IEA

@VoicesOfIEA

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

274subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003888297258
TypeChannel
Username@VoicesOfIEA
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 14 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/VoicesOfIEA

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

254279266.57 August 2026 — 254 subscribers7 August 2026 — 255 subscribers14 August 2026 — 256 subscribers27 August 2026 — 271 subscribers4 September 2026 — 279 subscribers12 September 2026 — 274 subscribers2747 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 250–283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 14:58274-5
4 Sept 2026, 00:57279+8
27 Aug 2026, 12:25271+15
14 Aug 2026, 19:44256+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:20255+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:18254first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3242.7%
💯2330.7%
🔥1520.0%
👌11.33%
👍11.33%
😁11.33%
🤩11.33%
🤯11.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC102 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2083961337219072133 So, lately Pakistan has been trying to organise several groups for armed rebellion against the IEA: something is definitely going on, after the attack in Badakhshan and the sudden profileration of announcements of new groups' constitutions. Taqi usmani has been saying that any form of rebellion against Pakistan is prohibited because Pakistan is supposedly an "Islamic State

👌1👍1

3 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC364 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2083619554207383568 Not an endorsement of the liberal ikhwani Obaidullah, but he's spot on here. So first of all the statement about "sharing DNA" was a mistranslation: 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗮 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 𝗟𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 "𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗗𝗡𝗔 𝗜𝘀 𝗢𝗻𝗲" 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲 The Taliban's Minister of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock, Mawlawi Attaullah Omari, was widely misquoted during his visit to India as saying, "Our DNA is one.

💯1🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC465 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

An honor to host the Pakistan Ministry of Interior, Mohsin Naqvi, here at Headquarters – the @FBI deeply appreciates their support as 𝐰𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐔𝐒 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐧(Colonized brown subjects). Important discussion surrounding facilitating resources and specialized training to combat counterterrorism financing and cyber investigations both at home and abroad. Our partnership is critical and we look forward to m

2🤩1🤯1

1 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC352 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @subcontscholarsFile

File, posted without a caption

4

25 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC462 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @deobandihanafiPhoto

وصف الصحفي أحمد فال الدين الموريتاني لحركة الطلبة بعد أن أجرى عدة مقابلات مع قياداتها والمقربين من الملا:

5

25 Jun 2026, 18:38 UTC≈1,120 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Every time a "controversial" ruling (I.e., anything not aligned to western norms and sensitivities) from Afghanistan reaches the news, it's always the same: "Muh that's not from Islam, that's CuLtUrE, backwards Pashtunwali tribal laws, Hindu-influenced subcontinental Deobandism". -No, it's actually standard Hanafi fiqh as clearly discussed in all these pre-deobandi works from Arab lands, Ottoman and Central Asian a

💯5

25 Jun 2026, 18:38 UTC≈1,340 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Western NGOs, liberals, feminists and ikhwano-salafees (yeah, they all basically share the same objections and are on the same boat as far as societal engineering is concerned) don't (just) have an issue with the Taliban and the Islamic Emirate; they have an issue with classical traditional Islam in and of itself. Classical traditional Islam of which the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is the only contemporary manife

💯5

25 Jun 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,260 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

See how openly they articulate their plan of nifaq of "convincing (fooling) Muslims with Islamic-sounding arguments to feed them the same kafir social engineering slop, but by (mis)quoting some Islamic concepts and terms and while wearing a foulard 🧕". This has been the freemasonic dajjalic agenda started with Afghani-Abduh-Rida and their "salafee-izlamist" movement: deist rationalist positivist secularist murtaddin

💯5

12 Jun 2026, 11:58 UTC491 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The mayor (Wali) of Herat, Mawlawi Nur Ahmad Islam Jar, explains the rules and regulations when it comes to detaining women; According to the rules and regulations, male law enforcement agents are not allowed to touch a woman. We have an experienced female team, who are skilled in law enforcement, who travel in a special vehicle that is tinted for privacy, so that the one being detained can feel comfortable and the

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @VoicesOfIEA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Voices of the IEA” (@VoicesOfIEA), 274 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VoicesOfIEA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.