اینکه یهویی افتادیم تو ایران و یهویی از همه جا فیلتر شدیم و یهویی همه چی قطع شد دلیل نمیشه فیلترشکنمون هم یهویی قطع بشه ، پس یهویی سرور های اینجارو تست کنین ؛ - @IRAN

Channel
𝙑𝙤𝙡𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙞 𝙀𝙙𝙞𝙩
@Volturi_edit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,117subscribers
-83 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001426731190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Volturi_edit |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Volturi_edit |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 23,117 | -50 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 23,167 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:27 | 23,177 | -25 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:47 | 23,202 | -37 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:56 | 23,239 | +228 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 23,011 | -49 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 23,060 | -29 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 23,089 | -23 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 23,112 | -11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 23,123 | -55 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:45 | 23,178 | +93 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 23,085 | +66 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 23,019 | -100 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 23,119 | +23 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 23,096 | -33 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 23,129 | -29 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 23,158 | -28 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 23,186 | -38 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 23,224 | +148 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 23,076 | first reading |
Engagement
127 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.22%
- avg views ÷ 23,117 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 281
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 127 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 127 (13 June 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 13,207 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 05:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 55s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
• به یارت متفاوت ابزار علاقه کن عاشقت شه :❤️ 【👫🏻• @Mii_paz 】 بیو انگلیسی 💌౾ @ibiographi رمان بخون! 🎂౾ @novelmaan کتابهای روانشناسی 🤍౾ @Reelaxation پلی لیستم 💌౾ @Toxyrics ترند میکاپ 🎂౾ @vahshieziba تم تلگرامت 💌౾ @ThEm_PINK فونت 𝗙𝗼𝗻𝘁 🎂౾ @Fonts_Land پروفایل شیک 🤍౾ @aks_profilestar عاشقتمم 🅛🅞🅥🅔 💌౾ @ghallbe_mani آهنگ خارجی 🎂౾ @yousimusic2 تڪخطۍ عاشقانه 🤍౾ @MAH128 بـیـو/𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐅 💌౾ @KHIIIAALLL فقط خُدا 🎂౾ @khoda_60 امیدواری تڪ…
👄محصولات روتین پوستی کره ای : @Shop
💀ببخشید اگه بعد از فهمیدن این فکتای روانشناسی سیاه ، آدمارو بهتر میشناسی : @DarkPsychology
اون از اول هم دوستت نداشت!! نشونه افرادی که بخاطر پول یا روابط جنسی وارد رابطه میشن از نظر روانشناسی سیاه : https://t.me/+9Q30_pgLPcFlYmNk
سرزمین پروفایل و بیوهای سبز قشنگتون:🌙 【 •🌓🌱@saaye_maah 】 🕊⬿بیو انگلیسی @ibiographi 🌳⬿تڪخطۍ 𝐁𝐢𝐎 @KALIIYOU 🐼⬿آهنگهای جدید @AVAYMUSIC 🕊⬿تم تلگرامت @ThEm_PINK 🌳⬿آهنگای نایاب @NayabMusik 🐼⬿فونت 𝗙𝗼𝗻𝘁 @Fonts_Land 🕊⬿ڪپشنهاے انگیزشۍ @AROME_DELAM 🌳⬿بیو عاشقانه @ibiolove 🐼⬿تڪخطۍ عاشقانه @MAH128 🕊⬿آهنگ/𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙙 @yousimusic 🌳⬿توییت فان @MELMAANI 🐼⬿فقط خُدا @khoda_60 🕊⬿نوشته دلی @theKhmud 🌳⬿پٰادکستِ انگیزشے @KHATZENDGII 🐼⬿اسمر•موکب…
💀روانشناسی تاریک یاد بگیر : @RAVAN
اگه میترسی وجه واقعی آدمای اطرافت ببینی ، اصلا روانشناسی سیاه نخون : @Ravan
💀روانشناسی تاریک یاد بگیر : @RAVAN
💀ببخشید اگه بعد از فهمیدن این فکتای روانشناسی سیاه ، آدمارو بهتر میشناسی : @DarkPsychology
• گوشه دنجی به دور از هیاهوی جهان🩵 : [•🕊🧊 @AARAMESHGRAPHY •] مولاناشعر ᐤ🧚♀°@samaedell رمان بخون! ᐤ✨°@novelmaan منبع پروفایل ᐤ🧚♀°@Qshangiyat آهنگهای جدید ᐤ✨°@AVAYMUSIC تم تلگرامت ᐤ🧚♀°@ThEm_PINK آهنگای نایاب ᐤ✨°@NayabMusik پروفایل شیک ᐤ🧚♀°@aks_profilestar ریمیکسای شاد ᐤ✨°@REMIXHEISHAD بیـو انگیزشی ᐤ🧚♀°@bio_angizeshi1 فروغ فرخزاد ᐤ✨°@ARAMESH_KADDE فقط خُدا ᐤ🧚♀°@khoda_60 عاشقتمم 🅛🅞🅥🅔 ᐤ✨°@ghallbe_mani بیو کوتاه ᐤ🧚♀…
اگه میترسی وجه واقعی آدمای اطرافت ببینی ، اصلا روانشناسی سیاه نخون : @Ravan
Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @Volturi_edit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نت چقدر داغونه، چیزی باز میشه براتون؟🤡
- به زور57%
- بگی نگی43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
نت چقدر داغونه، چیزی باز میشه براتون؟🤡
- به زور71%
- بگی نگی29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aArameshgraphy · 11,90744 posts༄🧡ᴀɴɪᴍᴇ | انیمه
@animepcute · 6,24744 postsآوای موزیک | آهنگ جدید
@AVAYMUSIC · 26,84044 postsاستوری غمگین بغض های شبانه
@booghz_shabaneh · 19,56244 posts◝دهکده کتاب لورین◜
@books_audio169 · 25,03044 posts•لحظههایِ رنگی•
@Colorful_moments · 17,91944 posts˼ دَرهـم ˹
@darham_chnll · 6,94944 postsدُژَم-
@dozham98 · 27,53644 posts⌞𝐄𝐬𝐡𝐠𝐡 𝐓𝐨♥️⌝
@eshqh_to · 17,96744 posts𝙁𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙇𝙖𝙣𝙙
@Fonts_Land · 28,17944 postsبیو|𝐺𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛•
@green_bio · 9,22444 posts『هُنریسم𐂂』
@i_honarism · 15,99744 posts• Bio | بیو انگلیسی
@ibiographi · 91,95344 posts• 𝐁𝐥𝐮𝐞 | آبی
@ibluo · 16,02744 posts"Moonstone"🌙🌑
@isolationmood · 11,46144 postsترند استایل
@itrendStyle · 11,91444 posts‹ جآنسـ🍀ـبز ›
@jan_sabz · 5,67444 posts‹ خــ🪽ـیآݪ ›
@khiiiaalll · 27,22644 postsخدا🌱
@khoda_60 · 14,36944 postsلاولی موزیک
@l0vely_musiic · 11,40644 posts┓☁️مآنارِم🤍┏
@manarem · 20,48744 posts« آرامِشمَــن🤍»
@mii_paz · 13,79444 postsایده سیو اسم | 𝕄𝕆𝕣𝕗𝕚ℕ
@Morrfinchnl · 9,35044 posts• موج تحول زندگی •
@mouje_tahavolezendegi · 17,31744 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Volturi_edit named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 13 October 2026 – 14 October 2026
named in 1 post, 13 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Our_bullshit · 1,131#1
@Fonts_Land · 28,179#2
@toolboxguk · 5,475#3
@iRoProxy · 7,957,197#4
@Devatutorial · 2,426#5
@editseven · 4,343#6
@editbalter · 9,437#7
@Iblueberriw · 11,969 (as read 19 September 2026)#8
@Toxyrics · 16,057#9
@ThemeTellgram · 9,449#10
@lltohill · 4,968#11
@bollaland · 29,568#12
@lana12345678910lana · 13,568 (as read 19 September 2026)#13
@heIpbox · 16,114#14
@Holyfroce · 35#15
@Xonicthemes · 1,174 (as read 19 September 2026)#16
@makxxeupp · 4,955#17
@moonlightreq · 399#18
@TheGamepc · 197#19
@meowmbti · 46,021#20
@arellatut · 6,889#21
@MukbangWorld · 23,213#22
@candyeditt1 · 24,393#23
@apkmodr · 2,532#24
@Garden_pretty · 22,522#25
@intelyoutube · 14,850#26
@aixcover · 8,549#27
@ParsTwt · 519,352#28
@sourett · 5,660#29
@AsmrArea · 10,041#30
@iMTProto · 7,631,325#31
@RegaPlus · 1,495,122#32
@TH3EME · 220,747#33
@taravat_text · 1,117#34
@Themecore · 138,985#35
@purevibes_only · 7,642#36
@nabistickers · 13,999#37
@vogueistic · 8,454#38
@moodSelirah · 145#39
@kimiko_english · 12,554#40
@editquestion · 1,452#41
@fear4lde · 23#42
@sleepy3tar · 7,865#43
@yegansdaily · 14,116#44
@himenosenpaie · 4,964#45
@baisvibe · 682#46
@evilspiris · 13,102#47
@makupdior · 4,326#48
@classicthemes · 479,979#49
@letskills · 84,132#50
@justlistenth · 1,175#51
@HollywoodCloud · 34,615#52
@anitco · 14,049#53
@Loverof_thesun · 13 (as read 19 September 2026)#54
@qill3o · 12,145#55
@ishipjkxv · 799#56
@MeowsMood · 6,193#57
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Fonts_Land · 28,179
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
@candyeditt1 · 24,393
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 September 2026
@Pink_bowtie · 42,536
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
@Background_Cute · 90,942
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
@editby · 60,011
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
@Girly_Royal · 46,144
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 September 2026
@dozham98 · 27,536
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
@arome_Delam · 49,522
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@QofleAhang · 66,022
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
@ReMiXQofli · 117,472
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@fonteditbyy · 22,620
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 September 2026
@marinaachannel · 28,218
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
@DEL_ANGIZ_JAN · 21,127
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
@iNteRvaAl · 19,548
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 October 2026
@tazin_sofree · 46,546
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
@Biohamm · 18,890
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 October 2026
@divar_neveshtha · 20,129
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
@sabzbemannn · 31,159
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
@QasrRoman · 23,014
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026
@ARAMESH_KADDE · 23,977
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙑𝙤𝙡𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙞 𝙀𝙙𝙞𝙩” (@Volturi_edit), 23,117 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Volturi_edit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.