وایب دخترایی که عاشق رنگ صورتی ان و با محصولات اینجا میکاپ میکنن💗💄 : @Pink

Channel
𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙗𝙖𝙣𝙜 ༢
@MukbangWorld
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,187subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001764083645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MukbangWorld |
| Description | غذاهايى كه تو كارتونا و انيمه ها ميبينى و دوست دارى امتحانشون كنى اينجاست:>>>> |
| Created | 7 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MukbangWorld |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:35 | 23,187 | -20 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:37 | 23,207 | +175 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:06 | 23,032 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:15 | 23,039 | -11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:46 | 23,050 | -21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:31 | 23,071 | -30 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 23,101 | -25 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 23,126 | -13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:50 | 23,139 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 23,155 | -16 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 23,171 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 23,185 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 23,194 | -19 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:15 | 23,213 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 23,224 | +178 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 23,046 | -20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:45 | 23,066 | -19 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 23,085 | -22 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 23,107 | -19 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:54 | 23,126 | first reading |
Engagement
208 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.42%
- avg views ÷ 23,187 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 793
- 79 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.92%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 79
- of 208 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 57 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 208 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 62,652 |
| Reactions total | 1,070 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,240
- Videos
- ≈24,200
- Links
- ≈5,750
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 29m
- Average length
- 1m 03s
Measured directly from 143 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,255 reactions across 165 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,294 | 70.5% | |
| 👎 | 419 | 12.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 226 | 6.94% | |
| 👍 | 94 | 2.89% | |
| 🗿 | 62 | 1.90% | |
| ⚡ | 47 | 1.44% | |
| 🍓 | 40 | 1.23% | |
| 🌚 | 28 | 0.86% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 0.338% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 0.276% | |
| 🍌 | 7 | 0.215% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 0.184% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 0.154% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.123% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.061% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.031% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 79 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
𓂃 🦐🥗 :𓐇 • موکبانگ غذای دریایی و سالاد ماکارونی و یه عالمه خوشمزهبازی دیگه؛ این ویدئو ها رسماً گرسنه تون میکنه 😭🤌🏻 · ─────♡──── · #Mukbang #Seafood #PastaSalad #FoodASMR · ─────♡──── · 𓆩 𝐌𝗎𝗄𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝐖𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𓆪
❤8👎5❤🔥1
𓂃 🥐🥞 :𓐇 · ─────♡──── · #Mukbang #AsianFood #FastFood · ─────♡──── · 𓆩 𝐌𝗎𝗄𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝐖𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𓆪
❤11👎2
🍔🍧•<دستپخت خوبی نداری، بیا!>•🍕🥐 @sheftehh 🌙بیو انگلیسی @ibiographi 🍃مولانامولانا @samaedell 🌙میکاپ•روتین @Iblueberriw 🍃تڪست 𝐁𝐢𝐎 @KALIIYOU 🌙رُمان مَمنوعـه @ROOMANIYA 🍃آهنگای نایاب @NayabMusik 🌙اسمر•موکبانگ @mukbangworld 🍃فونت 𝗙𝗼𝗻𝘁 @Fonts_Land 🌙پلی لیستم @Toxyrics 🍃پروفایل شیک @aks_profilestar 🌙بیو عاشقانه @ibiolove 🍃بیـو انگیزشی @bio_angizeshi1 🌙ریمیکسای شاد @REMIXHEISHAD 🍃بـیـو/𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐅 @KHIIIAALLL 🌙نوشته دلی @theKhmud…
𓂃 🍗🍯 :𓐇 • دست کم نیم کیلو غذا میخوره · ─────♡──── · #Mukbang #Dessert #FastFood · ─────♡──── · 𓆩 𝐌𝗎𝗄𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝐖𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𓆪
❤13👎4
𓂃 🥛🍯 :𓐇 • موکبانگ دسرای رنگی رنگی و خوشمزه 🥹🍽️ · ─────♡──── · #Mukbang #Dessert #Cookies · ─────♡──── · 𓆩 𝐌𝗎𝗄𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝐖𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𓆪
❤15❤🔥2👎1
𓂃 🍔🧀 :𓐇 • موکبانگ غذاهای خوشمزه و لذیذ کرهای · ─────♡──── · #Mukbang #AsmrFood #FastFood · ─────♡──── · 𓆩 𝐌𝗎𝗄𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝐖𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𓆪
🌚13❤7👎3👍1
𓂃🍫🍯:𓐇 • طرز تهیه کیک شکلاتی 🍩 · ─────♡──── · #Recipes #chocolate · ─────♡──── · 𓆩 𝐌𝗎𝗄𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝐖𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𓆪
❤8👎2
وایب دخترایی که عاشق رنگ صورتی ان و با محصولات اینجا میکاپ میکنن💗💄 : @Pink
❤1
𓂃 🍚🥟 :𓐇 · ─────♡──── · #Mukbang #AsianFood · ─────♡──── · 𓆩 𝐌𝗎𝗄𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝐖𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𓆪
❤17👎4👍2
▦ همیشه دوست داشتی توی مدرسه های جادوگری و فانتزی فیلما درس بخونی؟ اگه فرصتشو داشتی به کدوم مدرسه میرفتی؟🏰⭐️•
𓂃 🍽️🐾 :𓐇 • موکبانگ با پیشی کوچولوها، میشینن و با خیال راحت یامیام میکنن 😭🤏🏻🐱 · ─────♡──── · #CatMukbang #CatASMR #CuteCat #CatFood #PetMukbang · ─────♡──── · 𓆩 𝐌𝗎𝗄𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝐖𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𓆪
👎33❤20👍5❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @MukbangWorld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 58 posts on @MukbangWorld as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 17 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 12
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نت چقدر داغونه، چیزی باز میشه براتون؟🤡
- به زور57%
- بگی نگی43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 79 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@arome_Delam · 49,63266 postsتم تلگرام | والپیپر 💖
@them_pink · 47,34163 postsدلتنگیات 🥀 🖤
@del_tangiatm · 38,62261 postsپاپیون صورتی 🎀
@Pink_bowtie · 42,42761 postsشآیلین؛
@shinevis · 32,71758 posts𝙁𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙇𝙖𝙣𝙙
@Fonts_Land · 28,16157 posts[🌱مآرـــیـــنـــﺂ]
@marinaachannel · 28,21756 posts•[ 9 : 27 ]•
@Nbz_Morde · 27,72156 posts• مــ🌙ــاهـ دِلــمـ •
@MAH128 · 26,62955 postsبکگراند کیوت🍓 ִֶָ ִֶָ
@Background_Cute · 91,13354 postsدُژَم-
@dozham98 · 27,48354 posts• Bio | بیو انگلیسی
@ibiographi · 92,84153 posts‹ خــ🪽ـیآݪ ›
@khiiiaalll · 27,20652 postsRÂMONÂ🌈|رآمـوُنـا
@RAMONA_HE · 25,93651 posts◝دهکده کتاب لورین◜
@books_audio169 · 24,90849 posts• قشنگیآت •
@Qshangiyat · 43,79249 posts•آرامِشکدهـ❥
@ARAMESH_KADDE · 23,96545 postsبیو تک خطی
@Bio_TakKhati · 23,67643 posts𝐀𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐊☁️ | دخترونه
@ABRAK_KHANOM · 24,62142 postsمُهـٰاجر| MOHAJER
@MOHAJER_OFFICIALL · 23,54441 posts𝙑𝙤𝙡𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙞 𝙀𝙙𝙞𝙩
@Volturi_edit · 23,19141 postsاِروتا / تکست
@iErota1 · 22,19338 posts𑁍ࠬ🌱خط زندگے|توسعه فردی
@khatzendgii · 32,35130 postsشعر مولانا
@samaedell · 59,79228 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aArameshgraphy · 12,00041 posts༄🧡ᴀɴɪᴍᴇ | انیمه
@animepcute · 6,20241 postsآوای موزیک | آهنگ جدید
@AVAYMUSIC · 26,81341 postsبیو تک خطی
@Bio_TakKhati · 23,67641 posts◝دهکده کتاب لورین◜
@books_audio169 · 24,90841 posts•لحظههایِ رنگی•
@Colorful_moments · 17,88041 postsکَپشن :
@Cpti0n · 18,77041 posts˼ دَرهـم ˹
@darham_chnll · 7,00341 postsدُژَم-
@dozham98 · 27,48341 posts⌞𝐄𝐬𝐡𝐠𝐡 𝐓𝐨♥️⌝
@eshqh_to · 17,93841 posts𝙁𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙇𝙖𝙣𝙙
@Fonts_Land · 28,16141 postsسکوت خاص𓄹
@GhasedakSokuTe · 16,80441 postsبیو|𝐺𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛•
@green_bio · 9,26441 posts『هُنریسم𐂂』
@i_honarism · 15,95841 posts• بیو فارسی •
@ibiofarsi · 8,50541 posts• 𝐁𝐥𝐮𝐞 | آبی
@ibluo · 16,01241 postsاِروتا / تکست
@iErota1 · 22,19341 posts"Moonstone"🌙🌑
@isolationmood · 11,44041 postsترند استایل
@itrendStyle · 11,91541 posts‹ جآنسـ🍀ـبز ›
@jan_sabz · 5,74841 postsخدا🌱
@khoda_60 · 14,42341 postsلاولی موزیک
@l0vely_musiic · 11,52941 posts┓☁️مآنارِم🤍┏
@manarem · 20,36741 posts• موج تحول زندگی •
@mouje_tahavolezendegi · 17,26741 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@MukbangWorld named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 13 October 2026 – 14 October 2026
named in 1 post, 13 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@AsmrArea · 10,014#1
@RegaPlus · 1,507,609#2
@mukbang_asmrr · 11,287#3
@Iblueberriw · 11,963 (as read 19 September 2026)#4
@iRoProxy · 7,985,791#5
@yegansdaily · 13,975#6
@meowmbti · 25#7
@Vanilm · 16,555#8
@letskills · 83,609#9
@ParsTwt · 532,607#10
@TheGamepc · 211#11
@mbtixie · 41,483#12
@trashcandy · 62,649#13
@Holyfroce · 29,392#14
@YouBgo · 130,195#15
@makxxeupp · 4,965#16
@elfairya · 3,127#17
@razcom · 1,218,655#18
@vinyvidzam · 60,148#19
@iliya_yousfzadeh · 4,155#20
@lNaomll · 14,719#21
@Foodatun · 42,978#22
@Lyricsteach · 40,375#23
@kimiko_english · 12,517#24
@samepov · 51,464#25
@kdramathrapy · 17,641#26
@lana12345678910lana · 13,568 (as read 19 September 2026)#27
@WildestBlue · 13,017#28
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 1,020,809#29
@Ersalihatun · 138,721 (as read 19 September 2026)#30
@Garden_pretty · 22,305#31
@xbeus · 19,359#32
@Beustaa · 18,659#33
@hawlsu · 10,644#34
@sourett · 5,598#35
@ThemeTellgram · 9,519#36
@InJustListenArchive · 10,342#37
@bpland_4 · 6,571#38
@vlogcu · 231#39
@TH3EME · 219,545#40
@iMTProto · 7,720,892#41
@proxydaemi · 1,741,210#42
@sp4luv · 21,114#43
@sleepy3tar · 7,733#44
@himenosenpaie · 4,985#45
@explorextelegram · 76,693#46
@Comentive · 201,101#47
@evilspiris · 12,865#48
@asmrfoodmukbang · 8,639#49
@makupdior · 4,343#50
@OurMbtiDaily · 29,100#51
@p1ctok · 112,386 (as read 19 September 2026)#52
@RegaLeakShit · 40,969#53
@ir_javan · 638,533#54
@kianaafr · 403,985#55
@classicthemes · 472,209#56
@anitco · 14,135#57
@HollywoodCloud · 34,547#58
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Ashpazii_m · 19,658
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 September 2026
@tazin_sofree · 46,453
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
@Asmr_foodie · 31,477
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 5 September 2026
@Pink_bowtie · 42,427
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
@felfelsia · 30,347
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 8 September 2026
@Foodatun · 42,978
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
@Shekamow · 188,681
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
@ide_food · 404,379
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@FoOdDeCooR · 57,540
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 22 August 2026
@Cookwhen · 85,541
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 18 August 2026
@Volturi_edit · 23,191
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 September 2026
@iphotographr · 67,242
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
@varzesh_ba_raaghs · 1,314
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
@HowtMakeup · 29,259
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 6 September 2026
@RAMONA_HE · 25,936
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
@ABRAK_KHANOM · 24,621
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 September 2026
@HowFitnes · 36,591
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙗𝙖𝙣𝙜 ༢” (@MukbangWorld), 23,187 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MukbangWorld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.