توجه کنید به کائنات 🫵🏼

Channel
𝗉𝗂𝗑𝗂𝖾 𝗆𝖻𝗍𝗂
@mbtixie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,648subscribers
-463 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001895220850 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mbtixie |
| Description | ﹒⋆ ﹒ 𝖮𝗎𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗁𝖺𝗉𝖾 𝗎𝗌 𝖸𝗈𝗎 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖻𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆 ﹒⋆ ﹒ ֶָ֢ ⸝⸝ 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼𝗍 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖠𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗌: @pixiiland 🧚🏼 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mbtixie |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 43,648 | -26 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 43,674 | -15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 43,689 | -32 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 43,721 | -26 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 43,747 | -21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 43,768 | -15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 43,783 | -16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 43,799 | -37 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 43,836 | -21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 43,857 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 43,859 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 43,856 | -168 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 44,024 | -87 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 44,111 | first reading |
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.44%
- avg views ÷ 43,648 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,680
- 61 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.42%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 61
- of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 81 (13 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 224,593 |
| Reactions total | 3,134 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,060
- Videos
- ≈400
- Links
- ≈248
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,869 reactions across 78 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌚 | 1,970 | 40.5% | |
| 🍓 | 1,113 | 22.9% | |
| 😭 | 949 | 19.5% | |
| 🆒 | 440 | 9.04% | |
| 💋 | 363 | 7.46% | |
| 😢 | 34 | 0.698% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,869reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
آبان | scorpio امروز حس ششمت فوقالعاده قویه چیزی که ته دلت حس میکنی رو جدی بگیر، ولی برای تصمیم نهایی یکم صبر کن.
پارتنری که با کنار ENTP بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید باهوش باشه، از شیطنت و بحثهاش لذت ببره ولی وقتی زیادی از شاخهای به شاخهی دیگه میپره، بهش ثبات بده.
🍓54💋8🌚3🆒2
پارتنری که با کنار INTP بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید باثبات و همراه باشه، دنیای ذهنی و عجیبش رو دوست داشته باشه و وقتی زیادی توی فکر فرو میره توی سکوت همراهیش کنه.
🍓56💋7🆒3
پارتنری که با کنار ENFP بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید همراه باشه، شور و هیجانش رو دوست داشته باشه ولی وقتی ذهنش شلوغ میشه، به جای قضاوت کمکش کنه.
🍓47💋6
پارتنری که با کنار INFP بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید امن و گرم باشه، رویاها و احساساتش رو دوست داشته باشه و وقتی دنیای درونش زیادی شلوغ میشه، کنارش بمونه.
🍓50🆒6💋5
پارتنری که با کنار ENTJ بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید بااعتمادبهنفس باشه، از قدرتش نترسه و وقتی زیادی همهچیز رو کنترل میکنه، آرومش کنه.
🍓30💋6🆒3🌚2
پارتنری که با کنار INTJ بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید صبور باشه، به استقلالش احترام بذاره ولی کمکش کنه احساساتش رو راحتتر بیان کنه.
🍓53💋5😭2🆒2
پارتنری که با کنار ENFJ بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید قدردانباشه، محبت زیادش رو بفهمه و یادش بندازه که خودش هم حق داره گاهی مراقبت بشه.
💋27🍓10
پارتنری که با کنار INFJ بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید امن باشه، احساسات پیچیدهش رو بفهمه و وقتی زیادی همهچیز رو تحلیل میکنه، بهش آرامش بده.
💋53🍓13😭5
پارتنری که با کنار ESTJ بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید آروم باشه، قدرت و جاهطلبیش رو دوست داشته باشه و کمکش کنه گاهی کنترل همهچیز رو رها کنه و استراحت کنه.
💋31🍓3🆒1
پارتنری که با کنار ISTJ بودن میتونه کاملش کنه باید منعطف باشه، ثباتش رو دوست داشته باشه و کمکش کنه گاهی از چارچوبهای همیشگی خودش بیرون بیاد.
💋36🌚7🍓4🆒2
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @mbtixie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اورثینکر ترین از نظر مردم ؟ ☝🏻
- Infj22%
- Infp30%
- Intp27%
- Intj21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کاپل مورد علاقه مردم جهان؟ ( کاپلی که از نظرشون دوست داشتنی تره؟ )
- Enfp Intj31%
- Entp Infj23%
- Infj Intj13%
- Entp Intj18%
- Infp Estp14%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
دراماکویین ترین از نظر مردم؟
- Enfp27%
- Esfp21%
- Infp28%
- Isfp9%
- Enfj15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اونی که دوست همس؟
- Enfj22%
- Esfj13%
- Esfp18%
- Enfp48%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدوم تایپ بیشتر وجود داره؟
- Intj14%
- Istp16%
- Isfj21%
- Infj11%
- Infp38%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 232,507 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ThisIsFuckingGreen · 198,245
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@Avin_hastam · 226,315
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 524,611
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 August 2026
@MakeYourCharacter · 112,848
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
@TheGamepc · 105,831
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 16 August 2026
@vinyvidzam · 63,795
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 August 2026
@EveryPov · 241,884
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@mexxyoux · 100,400
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 15 August 2026
@explorextelegram · 79,792
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
@EnglishForYou · 426,151
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@crayingroom · 288,276
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
@donteatthishit · 71,833
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
@cIoudwords · 93,317
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 August 2026
@RavanTrapy · 73,421
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@NoteChnll · 116,039
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@letskills · 69,455
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
@mane_inja · 84,409
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
@spiiderclown · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
@Dzhav · 86,112
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
@ModBooks · 197,850
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@lingano_com · 165,909
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@clownText · 111,665
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 16 August 2026
@Amyraly · 115,853
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 August 2026
@ocbooks · 319,517
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 89 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗉𝗂𝗑𝗂𝖾 𝗆𝖻𝗍𝗂” (@mbtixie), 43,648 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbtixie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.