Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЧЕМ ЗАЙМЕМСЯ?

Channel

ЧЕМ ЗАЙМЕМСЯ?

@WHATWETODO

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,182subscribers

+152 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002583052423
TypeChannel
Username@WHATWETODO
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/WHATWETODO

Growth

2,0132,1822,097.57 August 2026 — 2,030 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,030 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,024 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,013 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,039 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,086 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,104 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,114 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,116 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,182 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net +152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,988–2,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 12:192,182+66
2 Sept 2026, 15:282,116+2
30 Aug 2026, 09:462,114+10
27 Aug 2026, 03:242,104+14
24 Aug 2026, 00:462,090+4
19 Aug 2026, 23:512,086+47
16 Aug 2026, 20:252,039+26
13 Aug 2026, 13:282,013-11
10 Aug 2026, 13:562,024-6
7 Aug 2026, 23:122,030no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:322,030first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 03s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

535 reactions across 22 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17232.1%
🥰13324.9%
👍6812.7%
👏315.79%
😍275.05%
🎉142.62%
🤩122.24%
😁101.87%
🤮101.87%
👎91.68%
👌71.31%
🔥71.31%
🤡71.31%
💩50.935%
💯40.748%
30.561%
🙏30.561%
🤗30.561%
💔20.374%
😇20.374%
5 further kinds61.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 535 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
18.2%
4 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
730
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
734
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC239 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Рисуем необычно 🎨 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

4👍3🥰3👏1💯1😍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC343 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Очаровательные птички 🐦 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

🥰61👍1😍1

7 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC383 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Идея из крышек 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

10👍3👏1💋1🔥1🥰1🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC564 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

Он был “не такой, как все” 🥱 Токсичный, женатый, с тремя кредитами - но не такой, как все Мама хваталась за сердце, подруги крутили у виска, а я писала ему "скучаю" в 3:17 ночи... 🍃 Почему мы влюбляемся в тех, кто приносит боль? 🍃 Почему сердце говорит "да", когда мозг орёт "ты что, дура?!" Разбираю это на молекулы в канале "Любовь зла" Заходи, пока опять не написала своему "не такому" ✍️ #реклама

👎4👍31👌1

6 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC595 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Открытка с шариком 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

11🥰5👍3👏2💯1😍1

6 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC634 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Красочный эксперимент 🎨 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

🥰127👍1👏1🔥1🤩1

6 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC634 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Рисуем 🎨 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

10👍4🥰4🔥2👏1

5 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC760 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Дерево 🌳 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

13🥰11😍5👍3🤗1😇1

5 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC749 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Родителям на заметку 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

16👍6🥰3👏2😍2🙏2👀1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC730 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

🧠 Вы живёте в теле... но знаете ли вы, как оно работает? Почему щёлкают суставы? Что происходит с мозгом во сне? Можно ли действительно умереть от страха? 📚 "Организм: инструкция по применению" - это канал, где врачи объясняют сложное простыми словами. Без мифов, без медицинского занудства - только ясные, удивительные и важные факты о вашем теле Подписывайтесь - поймёте, как устроена ваша самая ценная система 👉 @o

🤡6👍2🤔2

5 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC704 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Яркий опыт 🎨 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

12🥰4👍3🎉1👏1😍1

4 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC802 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Лебеди 🦢 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦 Лучшее детям

16🥰6👍4👏3😍2🤗1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @WHATWETODO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЧЕМ ЗАЙМЕМСЯ?” (@WHATWETODO), 2,182 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WHATWETODO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.