As Mark says…what we are witnessing is the Greatest Military Operation in History, unfolding before our eyes. -Deep Dives
❤25💯4
Signed Christel Q

Channel
@WWG1WGATOTAAL
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,919subscribers
-78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001532414042 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WWG1WGATOTAAL |
| Created | 3 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WWG1WGATOTAAL |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 8 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @warekracht/509567 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC | @WWG1WGATOTAAL/113358 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC | 1.00 | 6 minutes |
| @warekracht/509577 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC | @WWG1WGATOTAAL/113359 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @warekracht/509587 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC | @WWG1WGATOTAAL/113360 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @warekracht/509597 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC | @WWG1WGATOTAAL/113361 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @eenheidvoordevrijheid/902417 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC | @WWG1WGATOTAAL/113358 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC | 1.00 | 41 minutes |
| @eenheidvoordevrijheid/902427 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC | @WWG1WGATOTAAL/113359 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC | 1.00 | 41 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @warekracht | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 5 minutes | @warekracht (9–0) |
| @eenheidvoordevrijheid | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 41 minutes | @eenheidvoordevrijheid (6–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 12 of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 39 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @ninefornews. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 6,919 | -7 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 6,926 | -9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 6,935 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 6,934 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:45 | 6,941 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 6,951 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 6,949 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 6,952 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 6,964 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 6,976 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 6,983 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 6,986 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 6,996 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 6,997 | first reading |
135 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 135 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,000 reactions across 128 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,031 | 50.8% | |
| 👍 | 614 | 15.3% | |
| 💯 | 516 | 12.9% | |
| 🙏 | 434 | 10.8% | |
| 🔥 | 287 | 7.17% | |
| 👏 | 57 | 1.43% | |
| ⚡ | 35 | 0.875% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 0.425% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.075% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.075% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.025% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
As Mark says…what we are witnessing is the Greatest Military Operation in History, unfolding before our eyes. -Deep Dives
❤25💯4
Signed Christel Q
Voor een ongetraind oor klinkt dit als een normaal antwoord van Trump. Maar voor degenen die weten waar het materiaal van Uranium One uiteindelijk is beland, is dit ZEER interessant. Trump noemt in één adem de nucleaire wapens van zowel Iran als Noord-Korea. Trump heeft ook samengewerkt met het nieuwe Syrische regime om illegaal nucleair materiaal veilig te stellen in geheime faciliteiten. Trump heeft het materiaa…
👍20❤6🙏6💯3
8.19.26: We are WINNING BIG, Fauci drama, Schools, CDL cut, Deportations, Islm, PRAY! Watch on Rumble: https://tinyurl.com/mrns4ffa ➤ andweknow.com
❤21🔥3
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump eist de VERVOLGING van de Amerikaanse verrader en Trump-Russia Collusion Hoaxer Alexander Vindman nadat hij zijn race voor de Senaat van de VS verloor aan socialistische Angie Nixon — ondanks het ophalen van meer dan $10M SLUIT DE VERRADER OP! 🔥 "De meest bevredigende nederlaag gisteravond was die van een echte verraderlijke smeerlap, Alexander Vindman, tegen een Radicale Linkse Waanzinni…
❤20👍9👏1
https://t.me/realx22report Trump wist dat de diepe staat hem zou aanvallen. In plaats van ze onmiddellijk te stoppen, documenteerde hij elke actie. Zijn plan was om alle misdaden die ze begingen te verzamelen en te documenteren. De samenzwering dacht dat ze Trump uit de weg aan het ruimen waren. In werkelijkheid creëerden ze bewijs tegen zichzelf.
❤21🔥4😁2
🚨 ZO' EVEN: President Trump post dat SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts ONMIDDELLIJK het juiste moet doen, de activistische rechter moet neerslaan en de bouw van het Witte Huis militaire complex-balzaal moet LATEN VOORTGAAN Het is SCHANDALIG dat linksen de rechterlijke macht mogen bewapenen tegen de veiligheid van de president! SLA HET NEER EN BOUW 🇺🇸 Video in de link https://x.com/EricLDaugh https://x.com/i/statu…
❤27👏4
Hillary Clinton werd rechtstreeks bij naam genoemd in de rechtbank, niet alleen omdat ze de Russische Samenzwering-Coup tegen Trump goedkeurde, maar Clinton en haar campagne voerden ook desinformatie aan de mainstream media en de FBI om Trump te belasteren en het publiek te misleiden om hun verzonnen verhaal te ondersteunen. Dit alles terwijl ze wisten dat het hele verhaal over de Trump Organization-Alfa Bank server…
❤26💯4
Als president Trump kan worden AFGEZET en AANGEKLAAGD vanwege het verzonnen verhaal over de Russische inmenging dan zou Barack Obama de GEVANGENIS IN MOETEN voor het verzinnen ervan. Elke verrader moet een prijs betalen, met Barack Obama bovenaan de lijst. https://x.com/TheSCIF https://x.com/i/status/2089574613399245063
🔥29👍12💯9❤8⚡2
🇺🇸BRANDNIEUWS: Trump kondigt aan geen onderhandelingen met Iran — Straat van Hormuz is open Video in de link https://x.com/andweknow https://x.com/i/status/2089733552858648988
👍21❤9
🚨 Zojuist IN: President Trump kondigt aan dat de University of Miami de regering haar oorspronkelijke Ibogaine-aanvraag uit 1994 heeft GESCHONKEN, wat het proces van het gebruik van psychedelica om veteranen te helpen DRAMATISCH zal versnellen GROTE nieuws voor veteranen!🙏🏻 Joe Rogan legde het het beste uit: "Er zijn meer dan 5 miljoen mensen die momenteel verslaafd zijn aan opiaten in dit land. Met één dosis Iboga…
❤35🙏9👏1
🚨 WOW! Peilingen zijn net gesloten in Florida en de opkomst is DIEP-ROOD: OVER R+13 Verkiezingsdag: 🔴 REP: 785K 🔵 DEM: 397K Totaal: 🔴 REP: 1.7M 🔵 DEM: 1.266M Dit is geweldig nieuws. Republikeinen presteren beter dan verwacht voor november, waar we een RODE ZEEGFER nodig hebben om +4 Huiszetels te winnen dankzij de herindeling van Gov. Ron DeSantis LFG!! https://x.com/EricLDaugh https://x.com/i/status/20898500262…
❤34👍10👏2🙏2
🚨 Zojuist: TRUMP HEEFT Zojuist DE HAMER LATER VALLEN 🚨 President Trump heeft zojuist de federale rechtbanken overspoeld met een MASSALE golf van hardcore conservatieve rechters — de balans herstellend tegen jaren van activistische linksen die van de bank uit wetten hebben gemaakt. De Senaat bevestigde een reeks in juli… en Trump is al volop bezig met het stapelen van de kaarten: • Courtney Coker → Noordelijk District…
👍24❤9💯3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @WWG1WGATOTAAL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@WWG1WGATOTAAL named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WWG1WGA TOTAAL 🇳🇱🇺🇲🇷🇺” (@WWG1WGATOTAAL), 6,919 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WWG1WGATOTAAL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.