Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东莞公开榜

Channel

东莞公开榜

@XiaoChou_66

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11,559subscribers

+8,114 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003444638704
TypeChannel
Usernames@bikaqiu @XiaoChou_66
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held71
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/XiaoChou_66

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,44511,5597,5027 August 20268 November 2026
71 measurements spanning 93 days, net +8,114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,228–12,776 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 71
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 13:2011,559+59
7 Nov 2026, 11:4511,500+20
7 Nov 2026, 06:2011,480+36
6 Nov 2026, 09:0011,444+20
6 Nov 2026, 02:4011,424+36
5 Nov 2026, 10:2711,388+31
5 Nov 2026, 00:0411,357+32
4 Nov 2026, 09:5411,325+30
3 Nov 2026, 23:3611,295+33
3 Nov 2026, 09:2911,262+22
3 Nov 2026, 01:4411,240+21
2 Nov 2026, 09:3011,219+23
2 Nov 2026, 00:3611,196+27
1 Nov 2026, 09:1611,169+14
1 Nov 2026, 01:5811,155+41
31 Oct 2026, 07:5411,114+17
30 Oct 2026, 23:0811,097+25
30 Oct 2026, 09:2911,072+20
29 Oct 2026, 23:3711,052+10
29 Oct 2026, 12:5611,042first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.58%
avg views ÷ 11,559 subscribers
Avg views / post
183
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
39
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held48 (7 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total7,121
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 08:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 38s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (5.13%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 06:32 UTC143 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#南城 易梦玲 600一 1200二 联系 @yml0511 频道 https://t.me/yml02000 双向机器人 @yinmenting165_bot

8 Nov 2026, 06:19 UTC176 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#南城 露露 500一 1000二 2300夜 联系 @liciajie 频道 https://t.me/nixiaai 双向机器人 @lixiayabot

8 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC178 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#南城 漫漫 400一 800二 联系 @manman5701 频道 https://t.me/manmanlaogong123 双向机器人 @Mm5701_bot

8 Nov 2026, 05:55 UTC168 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#大朗 果儿 500一 1000二 2500夜 联系 @yyahwc66 频道 https://t.me/yyahwc999887 双向机器人 @jchgkgvblili66_bot

7 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC304 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#常平 小优优 500p 1000pp 联系 @xyy520hf 频道 https://t.me/fhxyy520888 双向 @hhjjyhhggbot

7 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC339 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#南城 冉冉 700一 1400二 联系 @ranran8860 频道 https://t.me/rnfse_hebd 双向机器人 @ranranzs_bot

7 Nov 2026, 12:28 UTC386 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#南城 晓晓 600p 1200pp 联系 @xxixxo88 频道 https://t.me/xiaoxiaoghk88 双向 @xiaoxiaoasd_bot

7 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC408 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#长安 兔兔 700一 1400二 3000夜 联系 @changantutu88 频道 https://t.me/tutu889910 双向机器人 @Changantutu999_bot

7 Nov 2026, 07:47 UTC50 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#南城 糖果 a套餐 500 b套餐 600 c套餐 700 d套餐 1500 联系 @NCTG888 频道 https://t.me/ltangguo 双向机器人 @NCTG888bot

7 Nov 2026, 07:27 UTC82 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#大朗 小七 600一 1200二 联系 @ZGxiaoqi 频道 https://t.me/djsisjsnn 双向机器人 @Zgxiaoqi123bot

7 Nov 2026, 07:18 UTC126 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#南城 知知 700一 1400二 联系 @KuRomi128 频道 t.me/KuRomi186 双向机器人 @HhkuRomibot

7 Nov 2026, 07:12 UTC78 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#南城 奶浴 九五400 九八400p 800pp 联系 @naiyuhf 频道 https://t.me/naihfg 双向 @naiyuvbot

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @XiaoChou_66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东莞公开榜” (@XiaoChou_66), 11,559 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XiaoChou_66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.