#南城 小乔 500一 1000二 3000夜 联系 @xxqq18 频道 https://t.me/xiyue766 双向机器人 @xiyue5566_bot
Channel
东城南城
@dgkkkzzz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14,914subscribers
+5,728 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003969381164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dgkkkzzz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dgkkkzzz |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 02:31 | 14,914 | +39 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:11 | 14,875 | +36 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:36 | 14,839 | +17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:09 | 14,822 | +22 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:54 | 14,800 | +50 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:54 | 14,750 | +39 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:21 | 14,711 | +27 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 14,684 | +34 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 14,650 | +22 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:19 | 14,628 | +31 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 14,597 | +40 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:19 | 14,557 | +47 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 14,510 | +32 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:54 | 14,478 | +48 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 14,430 | +50 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:21 | 14,380 | +48 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 14,332 | +45 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 14,287 | +33 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:10 | 14,254 | +22 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 14,232 | first reading |
Engagement
152 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.20%
- avg views ÷ 14,914 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 328
- 46 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 46
- of 152 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 152 (7 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 15,077 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 05:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 996
- Videos
- 188
- Links
- 190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12m 39s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 46 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#南城 子晴 400一 800二 联系 @ziqin0011 频道 https://t.me/ziqin0001 双向机器人 @ziqing168168_bot
#南城 怀孕 小晴天 500一 1000二 联系 @xiaoqing52033 频道 https://t.me/xiaoqing8869 双向机器人 @xiaoqing886bot
#南城 心心 600p 1200pp 联系 @xinxintto 频道 t.me/xinxinkks 双向 @xinxinAAbot
#南城 安安 600一 1200二 联系 @NSYAO2005 频道 https://t.me/baobao20061 双向机器人 @NSYAO20050_bot
#南城 晓晓 600p 1200pp 联系 @xxixxo88 频道 https://t.me/xiaoxiaoghk88 双向 @xiaoxiaoasd_bot
#南城 韦雪 600一 1200二 2800夜 联系 @atbctx668 频道 https://t.me/atvyoptc668 机器人 t.me/Skiejdiru_bot
#南城 咪咪 九五 400 九八 400一 800二 联系 @mitaoty 频道 https://t.me/mimiggyl 双向机器人 @mimiggybot
#东城 桃子 抓龙筋 九五 A套餐350 B套餐450 C套餐550 D套餐680 联系 @qingxiao2 频道 https://t.me/jiaqing2 双向机器人 @mengsxjiqirenbot
#南城 喵喵 400一 800二 联系 @wdii88988 频道 https://t.me/miaomiao889888 双向机器人 @miaomiao88988bot
#南城 冉冉 700一 1400二 联系 @ranran8860 频道 https://t.me/rnfse_hebd 双向机器人 @ranranzs_bot
#南城 晓晓 600p 1200pp 联系 @xxixxo88 频道 https://t.me/xiaoxiaoghk88 双向 @xiaoxiaoasd_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 152 posts we hold for @dgkkkzzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@dgcjbg888 · 14,947122 posts东莞公开榜置顶有抽奖 @vcaaa
@dg9876543210 · 32,96276 posts服务全能版的咪咪👅
@mimiggyl · 2,3814 posts苏禾的后宫🧚♀
@suhegk · 1,8064 posts雪儿的第二梦🥰
@atvyoptc668 · 2,4293 posts欧美臀露露-🐍吻
@nixiaai · 2,0413 posts服务版妍妍👅
@xinyanlg · 6363 posts园州
@dgjjjzzz · 3,3572 posts黄江塘厦
@dgtttrrr · 3,3172 posts服务版芙蓉
@furongjo · 4,0782 posts多米的小屋
@azduomi8 · 3061 post我的小屋
@dudumei992 · 5731 post是萌萌哇😊
@menmgj · 7591 post初恩🉐日常
@miemie37 · 331 post泡泡朋友圈
@xiaohuipyq · 3431 post园洲98莞式服务一条🐉
@yzgsfwytl · 1,5111 post珍珍Av日常
@zheng22222 · 4021 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@xiaoxiaoghk88 · 1,43317 posts🐍吻,SM 娇娇
@jiaonvde · 4,9544 posts南城💝小希☣️36D🉑6️⃣9️⃣正宗莞式一条龙真舌毒龙🔮
@LINGBAO2005 · 874 posts南城:(欢欢刚满18🌷)小屋🏘️
@sggsh56 · 1,1614 posts莉莉:🩷技师房🩷
@jsjsmsh63 · 3,8153 posts洛洛小屋
@luoluo1717 · 1,6973 posts可可的日记本
@keke2251 · 1782 posts🉑心朋友圈(个人开课👗
@kekexixin9257 · 1,8622 posts糯糯的频道
@nuonuo66666 · 5052 posts美美子的后花园
@qweasdsdf123 · 2,1462 posts苏禾的后宫🧚♀
@suhegk · 1,8062 posts月月小家🥰🥰
@syuugu · 2182 posts甜美温柔可乐的小包间
@tianmeikele666 · 1,9982 posts全国莞式全套会所
@wss917 · 12 posts服务版妍妍👅
@xinyanlg · 6362 posts迪拉的朋友圈
@zml6788 · 2,4032 posts服务版芙蓉
@furongjo · 4,0781 post南城绿萝700/PP
@lluofashh · 2,1551 postmengsxjiqirenbot
@mengsxjiqirenbot · 41 post水蜜桃🍑南城开课🀄️95-98
@shuimitao7933191 · 4161 post语嫣🉐幸福家园
@tangguo660 · 1821 post小萌🉐宝宝们💕
@xjie8898 · 2,3111 post芸芸的花园
@xmeng1689 · 1,5671 post南城妖妖频道
@Youyou_56 · 1,9081 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 7
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 7
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dgkkkzzz named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026 · confirmed gone 4 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 30 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 16 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东城南城” (@dgkkkzzz), 14,914 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dgkkkzzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.