Channel
@Xiaonizide
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
486subscribers
+88 since we began measuring on 9 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003848469996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Xiaonizide |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 2 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Xiaonizide |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 486 | +29 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 457 | +59 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 09:22 | 398 | no change |
| 9 Oct 2026, 08:47 | 398 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 May 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 855 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 09:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-10-09 【老师】：小妮子 【留名】：master 【人照】：10 【态度】：10 【环境】：10 【综合】：10 【过程】：上次 cj 妮子老师还是 5 月，突然发现昨天回归，确认空火速 cj 个 pp，从不写报告，妮子老师太有感觉了破例写一次。 水多水多 水多 比紧 大蟒蛇 不催 嫩妹女友感很足 做的时候反应真实 事前事后刷牙漱口好评 课室环境好 位置隐蔽 **本人不在意但是可能减分项：有大面积纹身 抽烟 苏州茶馆主群 https://t.me/szcgll @QiangSbot 机器人查车评，例如 : 某某某 茶馆不给任何老师担保收取定金！被骗请自理！
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
门已开 灯已亮 等你来 万事皆可期 嘻嘻
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
苏州硬了么报告模板： ---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-10-08 老师：#小妮子 留名：起风了 ---【👙整体形象】--- 人照差别：9 身材比例：8 气质魅力：8 ---【👧🏻服务质量】--- 服务水平：9 配合态度：8 舒适度：8 整场综合评分：8.33 ---【📝服务详情】--- 【过程描述】：假期刚反苏就看到小妮子回归，赶忙激动的发消息约课，按照指引出击，打开门还是那熟悉的面孔已经数不清是几刷了，坐在沙发上相拥聊着消失的这段时间的事，心里越发激动忍不住了一起共浴随后帮忙擦干，我一把把她推到在床上🐍了起来还是那么的美味，女上起手边🐍边干，换传教士大战三百回合后发射，太爽了没坚持到后入，这次时间有限只约了p下次一定pp起😙 【优点】：既有服务又很嫩 【建议/缺点】：无 【个人评价总结】：强烈推荐 🐍吻管饱 身材也很nice 服务态度很好 ❤️ 硬了么群友审美各不同，吾之蜜糖，彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头 ✳️Pow…
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
开课啦🤏
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
好久不见 十分想念 明天开哦
❤1
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
看看晚霞
❤2👍2
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
还在老家 没怎么看信息哦
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
红休了家人们
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
苏州硬了么报告模板： ---【💕基础信息】--- 时间：2026-05-07 老师：#小妮子 留名：莫言1 ---【👙整体形象】--- 人照差别：9 身材比例：9 气质魅力：9 ---【👧🏻服务质量】--- 服务水平：9.5 配合态度：9.5 舒适度：9.5 整场综合评分：9.25 ---【📝服务详情】--- 【过程描述】：上次约老师号炸了，在楼下等了一小时，还以为上岸了，前两天突然刷到，果断出击，颜值嫩妹，真人比照片好看，情绪价值到位，房间很干净，服务更是没得说，舌吻管饱这个很重要，口不说停不停，满足离开，喜欢嫩妹的首选 【优点】：舌吻管饱 【建议/缺点】：无69 【个人评价总结】：嫩妹颜值高 ❤️ 硬了么群友审美各不同，吾之蜜糖，彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
开课开课
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
🈵了可以约明天的课
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
开课啦
Signed 小妮子（姑苏区开课）
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Xiaonizide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小妮子的后花园” (@Xiaonizide), 486 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xiaonizide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.