Video, posted without a caption

Channel
伊一的小屋
@YiYi0629a
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
254subscribers
+210 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003868632799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YiYi0629a |
| Created | 9 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YiYi0629a |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 254 | +115 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 139 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 139 | +95 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 44 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 186.6%
- avg views ÷ 254 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 474
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.135%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (9 September 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,163 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
【时间】:2026-09-11 【老师】:伊一 【留名】:天凉好个秋(聊天版) 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:7 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:8.83 【过程】:原本只想随意逛逛茶楼,随手点了个抽奖按钮,没想到竟然中奖了。说实话,一开始并不想去——毕竟咱是准备上岸的。但问了几个狼友强烈推荐,说是遇到个不错的嫩妹,身材一流,不是精神小妹。我又查了下资料,确认还可以,便决定试试。 按照导航找到地址,遥控上楼。老师每天都会更换房间,整洁度与安全性都比较有保障。进门一看,之前的担心完全是多余的。房间布置得很用心,干净整洁,各种设施一应俱全。老师本人更是超乎预期——标准的大高个美女,身高目测在一米七左右(穿鞋了),身材比例极佳。尤其是那盈盈一握的细腰,搭配恰到好处的臀部曲线,视觉效果满分。B罩杯的尺寸虽不算大,但在她身上显得恰到好处,小巧精致。 她的普通话漏风,带着东北味,妆容精致而不失自然,整个人看起…
伊一的小屋 pinned a photo
醒了哥哥们。提前预约吧
休息了哥哥们 约明天吧 头课还在
还有两个空位。有要找伊一的吗
【时间】:2026-09-10 【老师】:伊一 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.67 【过程】:看到新上榜的妹妹,第一眼就很心动,简单了解了一下后,直接跟老师订了时间。 老师是自聊,到地方后直接推门进去就行,不需要在门口久等,这一点确实比约满课的老师方便不少,整个过程也比较轻松。 老师当天穿着一袭黑色连衣裙,皮肤白皙,身材高挑纤细,整体曲线非常漂亮。人照基本一致,尤其是黑白横条衣服那张,实际见面没有明显落差。老师是真材实料,身材比例很好,整体触感也相当不错,属于越看越喜欢的类型。 老师是厚嘴唇,亲吻的时候感觉很好,氛围感也比较到位。腰肢非常纤细,身上几乎没有多余赘肉,臀型圆润挺翘,线条特别漂亮。 过程中老师的配合度也不错,整体体验比较舒服,没有什么让人扫兴的地方。尤其从后面看过去,纤细的腰线搭配漂亮的臀型,视觉效果确实很顶。 老师是东北商…
❤1
【时间】:2026-09-10 【老师】:伊一 【留名】:666 【人照】:10 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.17 【过程】:妹妹守时诚信,约的时间比较早,老师睡眼朦胧的都过来了,好评就一定要给了 人照一致,很漂亮,身材很好,皮肤很白,东北嫩妹,说话大大咧咧,很善谈 陪浴,嫩妹三件套,可以舌吻,可以69,在嫩妹里面属于增值服务了,值得一提的是,妹妹的胸不大不小刚刚好,很挺拔,特别粉嫩,传教士,侧入,后入,传教士顺利出水,今天状态不佳,干了20分钟,没有尽兴,后面有顾客的原因冲洗走人,下次再来干尽兴! 优点:高颜值好身材的嫩妹一个 缺点:嫩妹通病没有什么服务 总结:老师在郑州待不了几天,喜欢高颜值嫩妹的不要错过,服务系绕行 以上仅为本人真实感受,狼友自行斟酌!
开课了 提前预约吧
报告来源:郑州烩面馆 【时间】:2026-09-10 【老师】:伊一 【留名】:Michael 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.83 【过程】:晚上闲来无事发现一个新开嫩妹,遂约之。依旧遥控上楼,见面后眼前一亮,170左右的身高,无照片无差的脸,又高又白,二弟瞬间起立致敬,老师很健谈,爱说爱笑,聊天中得知老师昨天才到,今天第一天开,暗自庆幸捡到宝了,主动陪浴后到床上,又发现大长腿皮肤又嫩又滑,依旧嫩妹三件套,老师主动要求女上先动两下,坐下瞬间被一处又紧又热的地方包裹住了,老师房间隔音不太好,捂着嘴低声叫的表情很吸引人,稍微动两下就快受不了了,遂要求后入欣赏大长腿,老师也很配合,最终在大长腿的视觉盛宴下出货。很美的嫩妹,有机会一定去二刷三刷
最后两个空位哥哥们
报告来源:郑州烩面馆 【时间】:2026-09-09 【老师】:伊一 【留名】:皮 戒赌 禁欲 健身 卡丘 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.83 【过程】:好几天没出击了 感觉鸡鸡痒痒的 突然就发现了小妹妹 约好时间果断出击 小区房很安全 遥控上楼后见到老师很震惊 又高又瘦又好看 胸还不小 这波血赚 洗澡老师还主动要求一块 点个赞 洗完躺床上等老师服务 虽然嫩妹系老师 没啥特殊服务 但是能🐍 能69 能口能舔咪咪 咪咪b左右 很软小蝴蝶虽然颜色稍重但无异味很紧 尤其人瘦屁股大又软 后入感觉拉满 我太满意了 而且老师态度好很配合 点赞点赞
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @YiYi0629a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“伊一的小屋” (@YiYi0629a), 254 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YiYi0629a.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.